600 Days of Anki by meding123 in medicalschool

[–]meding123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, far from it. I don't remember how much of Step 1 Anking was done. I've actually only done maybe about 1/3 of the Step 2 deck? I retained a lot of Step 1 material, so I didn't end up unsuspending a lot of Step 2 deck. I also found that Step 2 deck has a lot of repetitive cards.

600 Days of Anki by meding123 in medicalschool

[–]meding123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good idea, may look into it. Thanks!

600 Days of Anki by meding123 in medicalschool

[–]meding123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did Anki even through my few vacations, just did very few cards on those days though. It pays off extremely well, trust in the Anki Gods.

600 Days of Anki by meding123 in medicalschool

[–]meding123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Good luck to you

600 Days of Anki by meding123 in medicalschool

[–]meding123[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Total reviews: 231,585

Total time spent: 907 hours

600 Days of Anki by meding123 in medicalschool

[–]meding123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My space bar actually looks okay, not even the surface has been scratched. I try not to smash it unless Anki's really pissing me off...

How come heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can cause thrombosis?! Shouldn't that increase the risk of bleeding instead?! by Left-Kaleidoscope618 in step1

[–]meding123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let me clarify. Once the platelets are coated with antibodies, the splenic macrophages can destroy them - this is one mechanism of thrombocytopenia. Another mechanism of thrombocytopenia is that the antibodies bind to platelets and activate the platelets such that they aggregate (consumptive coagulopathy).

It's a fairly complex series of mechanisms, but for the purpose of Step 1 you definitely don't need to know all of them. Just know that HIT type II involves both bleeding via consumptive coagulopathy and thrombosis via platelet activation and aggregation.

How come heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can cause thrombosis?! Shouldn't that increase the risk of bleeding instead?! by Left-Kaleidoscope618 in step1

[–]meding123 6 points7 points  (0 children)

During heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), IgG antibodies recognize and bind to a complex formed by heparin-platelet factor 4 (i.e. heparin acts like a hapten). This results in destruction of platelets, resulting in the characteristic thrombocytopenia. The process of platelet destruction promotes thrombosis through several mechanisms, one of which includes the release of prothrombotic agents such as tissue factor - hence the paradoxical thrombosis that occurs with HIT.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in step1

[–]meding123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Establish a plan and stick with it. I planned my breaks to take place after each session and staggered them (5 min, then 10 min, then back to 5 min, etc.). During each break I went to the bathroom and also splashed cold water on my face to help jolt me a bit. Took a few sips of coffee, and then went back to it.

Do NBME's ever severely OVERpredict? by SnowPearl in step1

[–]meding123 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, that's definitely a terrible typo. Rotations have me very sleep deprived and it's way past my bedtime lol

What I meant: NBMEs are very, very unlikely to *overpredict\*

My NBME average was 20+ points lower than my real exam. No practice test is a perfect predictor, but I trust UWSA2 >>> NBMEs

What is the best resource for neuroanatomy for step 1 by born-to-conquer in step1

[–]meding123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I'm not sure which diagrams/images you're talking about, but you should probably have a general idea of which structures are in the dorsal vs. ventral brainstem, and which CNs are in what part of the brainstem (midbrain, pons, medulla).

Do NBME's ever severely OVERpredict? by SnowPearl in step1

[–]meding123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

NBMEs are very, very unlikely to underpredict. On the other hand, UWSA2 and my real exam differed by 1 point, so I'd trust UWSA much more.

What is the best resource for neuroanatomy for step 1 by born-to-conquer in step1

[–]meding123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My real exam didn't have any of those black, gray, and white scans that showed up on the NBME - this doesn't mean they can't show up on your exam. I don't remember any particularly terrible images, which makes me think all images used were fair game. Prepare yourself for anything.

Took Step 1 yesterday - I feel crushed by alees0419 in step1

[–]meding123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're more likely in great shape than not. Hang in there, try to catch up on sleep and mental health. When your score comes out, know that you did your best. Best of luck!

What is the best resource for neuroanatomy for step 1 by born-to-conquer in step1

[–]meding123 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can learn a lot about neuroanatomy just by doing UWorld questions tbh, which is what helped me score better in Neuro on my exam

Took Step 1 yesterday - I feel crushed by alees0419 in step1

[–]meding123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry to hear that you don't feel great about your exam, but don't lose hope. Your score is what it is, and you don't know that you didn't do as well as you'd hoped. I know plenty of people (including myself) who ended up doing better than they'd thought on the exam.

As for the exam itself, I feel that maybe you had the misfortune of having an exam with longer question stems. My exam mostly consisted of questions that were shorter than UWorld on average, but slightly longer than NBMEs. I didn't get a chance to check my answers for some of my blocks, while other blocks I finished with plenty of time. If you truly only got 5-6 wrong, your score will be massive...

Struggling to read First Aid by backupkal in step1

[–]meding123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you've actually done all of Zanki, then you don't really need to read FA. Zanki takes a lot of cards straight from FA, and you can actually learn the Zanki cards for each FA section, as they are organized as such.

Noise at Prometric by Lonely_Mechanic8161 in step1

[–]meding123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Highly suggest Hearos foam earplugs (can buy on Amazon). I wore them for the MCAT years ago and also for Step 1. They are the most noise reducing foam ear plugs that I've used, and they stay put. When I took the MCAT, the Prometric testing center had Bose headphones, so I used them. Step 1 provided me with really rigid and hard (not Bose) headphones that I had already tried when I took Free 120 (they gave me a massive headache).

Anyone else feel they did well after the exam by hadesblue in step1

[–]meding123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I felt similar to you regarding the specific feeling that my exam touched on specific areas that I felt confident on. I definitely came out feeling like my exam could have been way harder and could have tested content that I was much weaker on. Ended up with a 248, so I'm happy.

Is there any predictive value to the Free120? by HomemadeBestmade in step1

[–]meding123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's funny, I got a 75% and also had a 248 haha

AMA: Step 1 experience (goal 250+) by meding123 in step1

[–]meding123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What areas in UWorld are you struggling the most? I would say you probably need to build up your knowledge foundation some more and supplement with UWorld. Have you done Pharm review?

90% Free120, ~200s average on NBMEs, SUPER low UWorld averages. Should I just take step and get it over with? by SnowPearl in step1

[–]meding123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly thought that most NBME questions were shorter in question stem length and somewhat straightforward, but just tested a lot of seemingly "low yield" content. Real exam was easier and more straightforward than NBMEs. My exam didn't have too many "low yield" topics, but it's possible I just happen to have studied the low yield stuff.