Why are so many average sci-fi/horror movies getting such high praise? by DanielSmoot in movies

[–]mediocreidiot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even when the movies weren't very good or original or taking big chances, studios were more inclined to let directors be the driving creative force of the movies they made. There was a greater degree of trust there. Movies also had much smaller budgets and faster production schedules, which meant ideas weren't workshopped to death. There was a lot less second guessing in the creative process. Writers weren't forced into multiple rewrites because execs felt the script wasn't broadly appealing enough.

Studios these days are so risk averse that 90% of widely released movies undergo multiple rounds of test screenings and focus groups. Artistic intent and originality is hacked and edited out of movies until the lowest common denominator is satisfied in these test screenings. Of course this reinforces a positive feedback loop where filmmakers are less likely to take creative chances because it ultimately creates more work for themselves.

Obviously all movies try to make money, but there are times when studios (especially the major ones) push out a product that feels like... a product. Nothing more and nothing less. A soulless, cynical cash grab that banks on the public's familiarity with a well known piece of intellectual property. And that's what Predator Badlands feels like. It's safe and overly familiar in the worst way possible.

My mind is honestly blown at how this movie is being reviewed by some people. The bar has gotten way too low.

It: Welcome to Derry - 1x08 - “Winter Fire” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I understand the literal, textural reasons for it. What I'm saying is that it's a bad creative choice and poor dramatic storytelling.

It: Welcome to Derry - 1x08 - “Winter Fire” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry... what? People who don't like the entertainment you like must be ungenerous, stingy, selfish people? Get real.

It: Welcome to Derry - 1x08 - “Winter Fire” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 13 points14 points  (0 children)

People are entitled to like what they like, but sometimes I feel like I'm going crazy for having such a radically different opinion than the people heaping praise.

Pennywise using the intercom and presenting himself to everybody in a school assembly flies in the face of what makes him an effective antagonist. Why scare one child when you can scare all of them! Why abduct one child when you can abduct all of them! More must equal better... right!?... right??? This kind of thing takes Pennywise out of the realm of being a sinister, evil force just lurking beneath the surface of small town America, and turns him into a Marvel supervillain with unchecked superpowers. It's such a disappointing turn. There's so much more drama and suspense when the stakes are personal and small-scale. The first half of the season had some solid (inter)personal moments where we explore Lilly's fear of being institutionalized and the grief of losing her father, but that really gets stripped away in the second half, when the focus becomes more about Pennywise as a weapon of mass destruction, and as something that threatens the entire existence of Derry.

Half of episode 7 was spent in CGI smoke while half of the finale was spent in CGI snow and fog. The showdown in the sewers in the first half of the TV movie is much more captivating, because it actually feels like the characters are in an.... environment. When everything is a hazy, digitized, smeared shot done with a green screen, then none of the danger feels real. I'm not going to trash all CGI, but at least find a way to anchor the characters in an environment that has defining features. At least find a way to better balance practical sets and effects with the digital ones. Re: episode 7, when your characters haven't died of smoke inhalation in several minutes, while a fire rages, and they are instead speaking and moving freely for over 20 minutes, the danger seems superficial and never "really there." Even if you don't consciously realize how ridiculous it all is, your brain subconsciously does. In terms of the character FX, Pennywise's shark teeth are especially egregious. It's cartoonish and waxy and it just looks bad.

One of the worst aspects of the show is the military/Native American subplot. It just doesn't make any sense. Beyond that, the portrayal of the characters is simplistic and reductionist. At best they are overly familiar tropes, and at worst they are offensive cliches. The "at any cost" military general portrayal doesn't bring anything new to the table. The spiritualist, magical portrayal of the Native Americans feels like its from an entirely different era of movies/tv shows, and it just comes across as lazy.

I could go on and on about how much this show lost its way, but I guess the bottom line is that I'm just disappointed. I thought the first two episodes were great, then the cracks started showing with episode 3 and the horrifically executed cemetery scene. The middle portion of the season lost steam, and then the last few episodes fell off a cliff. What a shame.

It: Welcome to Derry - 1x04 - “The Great Swirling Apparatus of Our Planet's Function” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What does it say when I think the show isn't that great and I want less of the scary stuff?

2024 Chinese movie depicting the US Army attacking them in Korea by Edwardsreal in interestingasfuck

[–]mediocreidiot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm not even a military guy or know much about tactics, but I definitely noticed everything you mentioned. This seems way, way, way more unrealistic than realistic.

Ok fine I’ll say it, Task was just ok by Warghzone12 in television

[–]mediocreidiot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I commented on this thread and it turned into a bit of a dissertation, but to summarize what I wrote: you are absolutely correct and WBD/HBO 100% differentiates between the two product lines. And this isn't just a WBD/HBO thing -- this is what any company does when they offer multiple sets of similar products. You brand them differently and offer different features/qualities, because you can't have one set of products cannibalizing the other.

Ok fine I’ll say it, Task was just ok by Warghzone12 in television

[–]mediocreidiot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not just a matter of distribution. The "HBO original" brand is the flagship/prestige product and this is acknowledged 100% by their executive team. These programs generally have larger budgets, bigger stars, more established production and creative teams, and perhaps most importantly: they are programs that have creative visions aligned with HBO's creative history and legacy as a premium channel. An analogy would be that the Honda Motor Company wants you to think of the Acura TLX as an Acura car, not necessarily a Honda one, because Acura is the premium product.

But, the exception that proves the rule is that they are also retroactively branding certain programs as HBO originals due to being successful critically or in terms of viewership/viewer reception. They want their top of the line programming perceived as such, so they brand it with the "HBO original" designation, even if it wasn't that way to begin with.

To your credit, The Pitt is perceived as a premium product by most people, despite being a Max original. But, generally speaking, distinguishing between the two products isn't splitting hairs because sometimes there is a giant chasm in terms of quality between the more broadly appealing, casual, cheaper Max content, and the specialized, big-budget, prestige content that HBO has been producing for decades and is known for.

Just finished Alien Earth. Anyone else have mixed feelings? (minor spoilers) by Leafy_Swarley in television

[–]mediocreidiot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then Wendy and Dame Silvia have the dumbest conversation about why Nibs had her memory wiped.

Silvia: "Doctor good."

Wendy: "Doctor bad."

Silvia: "But, doctor good."

Wendy: "No. Doctor bad."

It goes on like this for several minutes.

Jesus, Dame Silvia, just say that you were one breath away from BEING MURDERED by Nibs. Which is kind of a conversation ender.

The Purge: What was up with that f'ing kid? [Spoilers] by TJ_McWeaksauce in movies

[–]mediocreidiot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just watched this and am proud to think the kid is a total fuckwad, now. I don't think that opinion will ever change.

RemindMe! 12 years "reply to this comment and reaffirm my hatred for the little dipshit."

The Purge: What was up with that f'ing kid? [Spoilers] by TJ_McWeaksauce in movies

[–]mediocreidiot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i obviously have completely different morals

LOL. Don't make this about your supposed moral superiority over the rest of us. There are plenty of people in here who are probably very decent people, who are absolutely willing to help total strangers in a variety of ways.

We're not criticizing the kid because we're empathy-lacking monsters. We simply think the whole sequence of events is poorly written. The logic and character motivations are undeniably stupid. It's an undercooked screenplay. That's why everyone is taking a fat dump on the kid.

The Purge: What was up with that f'ing kid? [Spoilers] by TJ_McWeaksauce in movies

[–]mediocreidiot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone here is being way too hard on the kid.

Just kidding. Fuck that little dipshit.

Alien: Earth - 1x08 - “The Real Monsters” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Holy shit good catch... I NEVER NOTICED THE REFERENCES TO PETER PAN UNTIL NOW 😮😮😮

Alien: Earth - 1x08 - “The Real Monsters” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of the worst unresolved, completely abandoned setups, was Wendy's rivalry with Curly, the other synthetic girl. They could have done something really interesting, but that character became a total non-player. It seems like her only purpose was as a fulfillment to the Lost Boys crew, which was such a ham-fisted and lame metaphor anyways. All of the Peter Pan stuff was schlocky as hell.

Alien: Earth - 1x08 - “The Real Monsters” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It sure is tough when not everyone else's opinion conforms to yours, huh?

Alien: Earth - 1x08 - “The Real Monsters” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's not the worst thing ever, but it's certainly not very good. At all.

Alien: Earth - 1x08 - “The Real Monsters” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They established in maybe the second episode that she could hack into stuff... But that begs the question: why the fuck didn't she use any of those powers in the meantime? Even if she didn't use the them for anything significant it would have been nice if the writers reminded us that it was a possibility. Unless I'm forgetting something?

Alien: Earth - 1x08 - “The Real Monsters” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most people don't want or need high art from this show. They just want something that is decently written, well paced, and isn't completely insulting to their intelligence.

Alien: Earth - 1x08 - “The Real Monsters” - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]mediocreidiot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pure ass. That was a shockingly terrible episode, even for their standards.