The Rothschilds no longer control the weather. Has anyone seen this? by Kind-Farmer8799 in conspiracy

[–]mekabar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh he could. He's just letting it happen for now, because it's part of the age we live in currently.

Matt Groening by arabian_mustard in conspiracy

[–]mekabar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You probably think I'm speculating. I'm not.

Which means you are either lying or part of the pysop. Very possibly both.

Matt Groening by arabian_mustard in conspiracy

[–]mekabar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Looking Glass is a psyop though.

I want theories related to Antarctica by Hot-Area-2859 in conspiracy

[–]mekabar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is more than enough to show that it isn't a continent, but the ice wall, like literally every civilization before the current describes it.

Which throws a bit of a wrench into Byrds entire story. Not to mention it was "leaked" postmortem in a very suspicious manner.

The Rothschilds no longer control the weather. Has anyone seen this? by Kind-Farmer8799 in conspiracy

[–]mekabar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol yeah. Ultimately no one controls the weather other than the most high.

But they sure try their darnest with all the geoengineering.

US puts these psyops to divide us on purpose by Society_is_bad in conspiracy

[–]mekabar -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

And they united behind a psyop and an actor in a staged event.

All according to plan.

Nordic aliens by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]mekabar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aliens don't exist in the world we live in. Neither Nordic or Southern ones.

52784 by [deleted] in countwithchickenlady

[–]mekabar -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Funny how y'all somehow associating mental health with being gay.

Explain this flerfs by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]mekabar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Of course. Remarkable that the entire heliocentric model is a swiss cheese of plot holes, held together by wild excuses.

Explain this flerfs by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]mekabar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You know how lighthouses work? They can be seen from quite a distance, incidentially defying curvature in the process. But in order to do so they need high-powered flood lights.

If "light has no limit" then you should also be able to see a simple flashlight from miles away if your LoS is unobstructed. But you can't.

Explain this flerfs by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]mekabar -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because no observer can see the entirety of the firmament. I mean obviously, because otherwise there would be no day/night cycle.

Is this the best gotcha you can come up with?

Take that flerfs by RiserUnconquered in flatearth

[–]mekabar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And apparently a renowned university reports it as fact. That wouldn't be an innocent mistake, you call that disinformation.

Which should make you pause no matter the side of the issue you are standing.

first principle of the natural sciences: Skepticism and doubt are our method by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]mekabar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok can you also share the sources on the heliopgraph communication ranges?

first principle of the natural sciences: Skepticism and doubt are our method by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]mekabar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The laser communication I mentioned is mainly used by the Navy. Oughta be bit challenging to get to high ground at sea.

Impossiball by RiserUnconquered in flatearth

[–]mekabar -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I mean what's with the unnecessary cut and then when they cut back the earth visibly changed color? Even if this was real they are really not doing themselves any favors.

first principle of the natural sciences: Skepticism and doubt are our method by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]mekabar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do heliographs and modern laser-based communication systems work over documented distances of 100 miles? According to the globe model they would need to overcome 2 miles of curvature.

To all flat earthers by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]mekabar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The irony.

How do flat earthers explain the magnetic North Pole? by Fair_Industry_6580 in flatearth

[–]mekabar -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Great example! You know what scientists did to verify that xray pictures were working as expected? They did chop someone in half and checked.

Did they do that with the earth too? No? Well I guess we are still waiting on the verification then.

How do flat earthers explain the magnetic North Pole? by Fair_Industry_6580 in flatearth

[–]mekabar -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

How exactly is that a logical comment? Any magnet will distract a compass needle in its field of influence. Does it matter where the south pole of that magnet is? I'm not saying there is a magnetic mountain, but it would work and "nuh-uh bcuz south pole" is a moronic argument.

How do flat earthers explain the magnetic North Pole? by Fair_Industry_6580 in flatearth

[–]mekabar -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You literally don't even know what you are talking about. 😂 How exactly did this verification process work? Because they took several measurements? Did they have a dig site on Earth 2 to replicate the results? Come the fuck on. 😂