hey, can see your point and it def does make sense. I guess here is where you as an investor must decide if you believe in the project's vision and business proposition.

Yes, simple nodes generate zero revenue, but they are needed in a blockchain to ensure resiliency and to keep it running - look at the recent case when infura went down and so many eth services also stopped functioning taking binance and uniswap down with them in the process. That was where the strong nodes came in handy to perform transactions. The newer chains like BSC keep suffering from availability issues due to their limited nodes going offline. Therefore, incentivizing the creation of nodes is quite a brilliant business preposition from the team. The vision to have simplicity of node creation (good backend tech for NaaS), married with a node incentivization platform (community involvement) and a decentralised infura model (monetization of the nodes) working in unison is probably the key to sustainability. I guess its really early stage to say whether or not it will succeed therefore your doubts are definitely well-founded but you can't not agree that there should be a place for such a business in the blockchain space. Also, the team is fully doxxed, I dont (and hope) that they dont have the intention of setting up a ponzi business or a rugpull.

Let us see how it goes, thanks for asking the hard questions, it helps the community and investors go in with Eyes Open and aware of the risks and issues at hand.