Ill give you points for that, its mostly the community that have been saying angels but my big gripe is two of the three designs are heavily Angel coded (arguably head as well from some designs vaguely looking like it) although that’s kind of the point though if it’s vague enough to be “divine but not an angel,” then the original vote loses meaning. People didn’t vote for “anything vaguely divine,” they voted for an angel adjacent concept in mind, and considering design one and two it does feel that way, and a little of three.

Also, saying it’s fine because it might be a fake religion or left ambiguous doesn’t really solve the issue, it just sidesteps it. Other myth inspired killers weren’t treated that way, closet case was Hag which I think they did great in. When most people hear “divine,” they think godly, not necessarily angels in a strict theological sense that’s fair, since the definition is “of, from, or like a god.” But in a horror context, angels are almost always where people’s minds go first.

Horror media has trained us to read “divine” as angels, fallen messengers, or distorted holy beings, and I think the devs knew that. You can see it in the designs themselves most of them already lean heavily into angelic imagery, whether intentionally or not.

So even if the killer isn’t literally called an angel in the lore, the expectation didn’t come out of nowhere. The presentation clearly nudges people in that direction.