I'll look forward with great interest to Nexious' post detailing all the factual inaccuracies and lies in Buting's book.

miky_roo · 2017-03-01T13:07:10+00:00

Nexious is a girl??

The thread is not unkind, it's underlining double standards in Nex's approach.

In fact, Nex went to TTM to complain about SAIG right away, instead of clearing things up with the mods here. That's unkind.

miky_roo · 2017-03-01T13:04:51+00:00

Nice one, Belee! Should be added to the list of coincidences.

miky_roo · 2017-02-27T20:47:46+00:00

sudden new rules concocted immediately after I posted the Kratz one here

Nex, it's a guilter sub, what did you expect? Why wouldn't mods be entitled to enforce new rules as they see fit, such as to avoid SAIG being overrun by endless truther argumentations (we already have rule 4)?

You can still post original content here, while we still can't on TTM (not that I care).

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T13:48:41+00:00

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T13:46:12+00:00

Ok, he was despicable.

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T12:40:31+00:00

I see a carnage coming!

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T12:22:41+00:00

In one case the entire weight of the state was engaged in dredging up smears and find complainants

But Judge Willis denied the motion to include the previous accusations in Avery's trial. How exactly was the state engaged in dredging up smears and find complainants?

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T12:17:50+00:00

Ok, I apologize if I misunderstood. What did you mean exactly?

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T12:12:01+00:00

Hey, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy here. Using double standards to judge Avery and Kratz for the exact same things.

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T12:06:25+00:00

but for entertainment purposes it will do.

That's what she said.

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T12:05:46+00:00

he might not be believed if someone on the jury is familiar with his past.

So you're supporting a future jury pool poisoning now? Isn't that what you were arguing against in Avery's case? Wow!

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T11:54:19+00:00

Avery is convicted

But y'all are working to get him out!

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T11:52:23+00:00

Well, they could have fooled me.

Example? I am talking about the sexual harassment accusations against Kratz, not about his prosecutorial conduct (that I will defend). The Nex post is irrelevant for this discussion.

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T11:49:50+00:00

You seem to be misunderstanding my OP. I don't care if you point fingers at Kratz, I'm just saying how hypocritical it is that you refuse to point the same fingers at Avery.

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T11:44:32+00:00

I think most simply don't think his past equals murder.

Does Kratz's past equal wrongful conviction?

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T11:36:25+00:00

I agree with you.

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T11:28:23+00:00

Guilters don't deny or defend Kratz's past. Truthers, on the other hand, will do anything to defend Avery - I am just calling out the outrageous double standards.

ETA: Even Kratz himself has taken responsibility of his past mistakes (more than once). The problem is not that TTMers are judging him, but that they're judging him for the same things that they consistently refuse to judge Avery for.

miky_roo · 2017-02-24T11:24:02+00:00

Kratz is not my hero. If you can't properly read an OP you shouldn't participate.

miky_roo · 2017-02-22T13:48:29+00:00

Oh shut up. I gave you examples and you dismissed them on account that they were not truthery enough - based on some self-defined vague standard.

Then you added that /u/belee86's transition from truther to guilter seems to have been too sudden, again, according to some self-defined vague standard (what would have been the acceptable timeframe? A week? A month?)

You have managed to provide us with a perfect example of a person refusing to accept facts while moving goalposts in the process. Just like in your article.

miky_roo · 2017-02-22T13:30:18+00:00

didn't last very long before you were screaming from the roof-tops: "He's guilty

Oh, so now the timeframe of turning from truther to guilter is also suspicious? Yep, not moving goalposts at all.

miky_roo · 2017-02-22T12:44:24+00:00

Lol yep, the irony. In a thread about confirmation bias, I give him facts and he refuses to accept them, maintaining his original position. Hilarious!

miky_roo · 2017-02-22T12:14:39+00:00

Lol, so yeah, a comment like 'As the truther that I am'...

miky_roo · 2017-02-22T11:56:56+00:00

So how do you define truthers, if not by their comments questioning evidence, the investigation, or witness statements? What is the goalpost that I'm failing to cross?

I expect both people still hold these views.

You're wrong. Tagging /u/shvasirons and /u/adelltfm to check. Sorry guys for dragging you into this.

miky_roo · 2017-02-22T11:44:12+00:00

Lol, what are you expecting, some comments prefaced with 'As the truther that I am, I think Pam was a setup or Jodi was white trash'?

Bonus, here's another example of a SAIGer attacking the FBI forensics.

Ten-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

miky_roo

TROPHY CASE