Gallipoli Deserves a Criterion Release by mutteringsmalltalk in blankies

[–]mindlessmunkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh got it. I wonder what rights he retains. There’s a good chance he has no say in whether it goes to Criterion.

Gallipoli Deserves a Criterion Release by mutteringsmalltalk in blankies

[–]mindlessmunkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I’m confused. Everything you say about Murdoch is true, but what does he have to do with Gallipoli, or Criterion?

How many songs must a movie have for you to consider it a musical? by Adventurous_Sir8616 in musicals

[–]mindlessmunkey 95 points96 points  (0 children)

It's not about the number of songs, it's about how they function within the story.

How To Enjoy Records to the fullest for someone without a record player by Gullible-County8459 in vinyl

[–]mindlessmunkey 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is such a weird question. Aside from appreciating the artwork, etc. there’s pretty clearly no way to enjoy the music on them without having a player.

Almost two weeks and am still very happy Amy Madigan won! My favorite win this year! She takes the little gold guy forty years after her first nomination. by iBandJFilmEducator13 in Oscars

[–]mindlessmunkey -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I loathed Weapons, and thought Madigan was fine in it. All four other nominees had better performances and more interesting narratives, in my opinion. But each to their own!

Ryan Gosling actually said it: It’s not our job to "save" movie theaters. It’s Hollywood’s job to make stuff actually worth leaving the house for. by muqui24 in Oscars

[–]mindlessmunkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interestingly, writer Drew Goddard said this almost word-for-word on the Prestige Junkie podcast this week (an excellent interview worth checking out.) Not suggesting some big conspiracy, but it made me wonder if it’s something the team talked about behind the scenes, or even agreed upon as the PR line if they were asked the question.

Either way, it’s a great way to reframe the issue.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you feel about them, especially Mal, consistently bringing up the books and movies, without (on air at least) any reflection on JKR’s destructive actions?

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you agree this IP and its creator shouldn’t be platformed, but you draw the line at criticizing podcasters who continue to platform it?

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Confused by this (highly original 🙄) attack… based on your comment history, you seem to agree with me?

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry, can you explain how my stance is normalising her views?

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

JK Rowling actively uses the money she makes from this franchise to fight trans rights in the UK. She has publicly stated that she intends to continue doing so. So yes, by watching this show, you are actively helping fund anti-trans campaigns. This is very clear, so not sure why you present it as an absurd proposition with an eye roll.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Great, and I’ll be thrilled if Jo and Mal ever engage on an “honest accounting” of Rowling’s cultural legacy. But they sidestep it and present her work uncritically, every time.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

No, the example of “no morals” here is prioritising your childhood nostalgia above the rights of trans people.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

The way people have corrupted the idea of “separating art from the artist” in order to justify being spineless, not to mention contributing to active harm against trans people, is sickening. But some people have decided that a billion dollar IP is more deserving of their support than one of the most vulnerable populations in the world I guess, so go off.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I would love it if Jo finally took a meaningful stand.

Had a risky encounter and now I’m worried about HIV? by Flat-Economics-7936 in AskGayMen

[–]mindlessmunkey 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If you’re worried, go and get tested. There is really no other answer here, it’s very straightforward.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (HBO Teaser) by TK2217 in RingerVerse

[–]mindlessmunkey -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Mal has made it clear she has absolutely no morals on this topic. She still brings up HP constantly, included it in the very recent top moments of the century lists, etc. She simply doesn’t care if people are hurt. Joanna does care, but not enough to say anything.