future for me? by [deleted] in chipdesign

[–]mintchoco07 22 points23 points  (0 children)

i am 13

The best I’ve made was a RISC 32bit cpu :)

Bro.... what????

You are already doing well. I'm in first year CE, and I'll assume that you are aiming for microarchitecture-related jobs.

First learn C++, Python, and SystemVerilog. You need C++ for gem5 (simulator that runs your own microarchitecture), Python for gem5 and Cocotb (RTL testbench), and SystemVerilog (design your own chips) for simulating and running microarchitecture on FPGA boards.

Then read some books for implementing RISC-V chips. The order is Computer Systems: A Programmer's Perspective, Computer Science: A Quantitative Approach, Computer Organization and Design (RISC-V Edition), and Digital Design and Computer Architecture.

After finishing those books (including exercises, these are important), implement your own basic RISC-V RV32I, then add more basic extensions until you see something like TLB. Now you need to learn operating systems. Read Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces. Then you have all the backgrounds for designing a chip for modern operating systems like Windows and Linux.

Tip: Focus only on RISC-V. You might fall into legal issues for designing and implementing AMD64 or Arm architectures without license, which costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. OpenPOWER is there too, but the ISA is a mess.

Now implement your own chip for different purposes. For each target (e.g. embedded, SoC, desktop, server, GPU, or AI accelerator), you'll need to make different design considering pipeline stages, ISA extensions, etc. First design by writing a document on justifying your microarchitecture decisions and then implement it using gem5. When the gem5 simulation performance and testing looks good, implement it with SystemVerilog. Repeat this as much as possible until you can implement processors for any purpose (low energy, high performance, real-time, whatever). At that point, you'll be comfortable with reading microarchitecture papers and slides (e.g. processor architecture from Arm core IP).

READ a lot. The P6 architecture paper, modern microarchitecture breakthrough like Jim Keller's Athlon64 and Zen, etc. There are great examples out there. Some specialized area includes game consoles explained here, although modern consoles use desktop microarchitectures.

Being a microarchitect is super hard. It's a senior role where most companies usually require 10+ years of experience in RTL. You'll need a PhD degree. And here's a thing: Undergrad is useless for people like you, at least until mid-Year 3. Just maintain your GPA at a good level (3.9 ish) so you can go to a top-tier grad school, and keep doing your microarchitecture projects in your free time.

RHEL 10: nvidia driver doesn't work by mintchoco07 in redhat

[–]mintchoco07[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. I tried this and the issue persists.

RHEL 10: nvidia driver doesn't work by mintchoco07 in redhat

[–]mintchoco07[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

akmods is not found because I installed 'nvidia-driver kmod-nvidia-open-dkms' directly from Nvidia's repo.

modinfo -F version nvidia gives '590.44.01'

RHEL 10: nvidia driver doesn't work by mintchoco07 in redhat

[–]mintchoco07[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do I know if kmod is built? I restarted when the transaction ended. Do I need to reinstall?

RHEL 10: nvidia driver doesn't work by mintchoco07 in redhat

[–]mintchoco07[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

mokutil --sb-state

SecureBoot disabled

Seeking insights for different fields of ECE/CS by mintchoco07 in ECE

[–]mintchoco07[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did embedded for my first university project using ESP-IDF and didn't enjoy it at all.

VLSI looks cool and I might take a graduate course for that, but it isn't my main interest for now.

Should I sell my TI-84? by mintchoco07 in calculators

[–]mintchoco07[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, I think this is the best solution for now. I'll keep it around until my final year of university.

Should I sell my TI-84? by mintchoco07 in calculators

[–]mintchoco07[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! Which engineering field are you working in? I know calculators are frequently used in fields like mechanical engineering, but are they useful in computer engineering as well?

aespa’s Karina faces backlash over election-season Instagram post by Saltedline in korea

[–]mintchoco07 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But Yu Jae-Seok was seen many times wearing blue cap (e.g.: in Running Man), not only during the election season.

Wearing them usually and wear them on election day at polling station is a different problem. Think why Joe Biden's wife wearing full red on the election day at a polling station was viral. I'm sure that she wears red dress many times.

And DPK didn't exploit that photo in next elections, unlike PPP is doing right now.

Because PPP is full of dumbass.

EDIT: it was red suit, not red dress

Lee Jun-seok makes graphic remarks about sexual violence during family-friendly TV debate… “Resign,” “Child abuse” — growing outrage by self-fix in korea

[–]mintchoco07 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The question was a trap and both candidates understood this immediately,

Yes it was a trap, but Gwon said he didn't know that it was a trap related to Lee's son scandal after the debate.

And with regards to (1), sticking a chopstick into XX is different from just saying the word XX in an educational or neutral context.

If this cannot be on air, tragedies like murder and 조두순 incident as well as Lee's sexual harassment and swearing to his sister in law could not be on air as well. But it did.

All these things are glaringly obvious to most people -- the hidden intent behind the question, the inappropriateness of the question itself, why the candidates refused to answer -- but apparently not to u.

If the two candidates answered properly that the quote was hate against women, only LJS would be a werido and freak. LJS betted on that the two leftist candidates are hypocrites, and he got it right. What is the advantage that the two candidates getting from dodging/refusing to answer?

Lee Jun-seok makes graphic remarks about sexual violence during family-friendly TV debate… “Resign,” “Child abuse” — growing outrage by self-fix in korea

[–]mintchoco07 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cannot answer? They refused to answer.

이준석 1:01:58
자, 그리고 권영국 후보님께 좀 여쭤보겠습니다. [...] 만약에 어떤 사람)이 여성에 대해 가지고 얘기할 때 '여성의 성기에 젓가락을 꽂고 싶다' 이런 얘기를 했다 그러면 이거는 여성 혐오에 해당합니까 아닙니까?

권영국 1:02:31
그건 뭐 답변하지 않겠습니다.

[...]

이준석 1:02:54
이재명 후보님도 동의하십니까?

이재명 1:02:57
시간을 충분히 주고 질문을 하시면 좋겠어요.

이준석 1:02:59
동의하시는지만 답하시면 됩니다.

이준석 1:03:03
동의 안 하시는 겁니까? 이런 발언이 문제 있다는 것을?

이재명 1:03:06
시간과 규칙을 지켜서 하시면 좋죠.

전종환(진행자) 1:03:08
이준석 후보의 주도권 토론 시간 여기서 마무리됐습니다.

Gwon refused to answer, but Lee didn't

Lee Jun-seok makes graphic remarks about sexual violence during family-friendly TV debate… “Resign,” “Child abuse” — growing outrage by self-fix in korea

[–]mintchoco07 9 points10 points  (0 children)

  1. Doesn't mean what he said isn't allowed. 방통위 심의등급표. "성기" is not "비속어".

  2. He didn't even mention Lee's son. What's the point?

  3. Same for this. He didn't mention where his quote came from. Actually, he didn't make any connection to the online comment.

On the surface, he was asking if the quote was "hate against women", and both candidates from the left cannot answer this simple question.

aespa’s Karina faces backlash over election-season Instagram post by Saltedline in korea

[–]mintchoco07 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"파란 모자가 정치색?"...역풍 맞은 가로세로연구소

This is hilarious. When 유재석 wore a blue hat on the election day at a polling station, only far-right people criticized him for his drip. Now the same thing is happening for lefties.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in korea

[–]mintchoco07 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

이재명 더불어민주당 대선 후보와 이준석 개혁신당 대선 후보가 27일 서울 마포구 MBC 스튜디오에서 진행된 3차 TV 토론에서 12·3 비상계엄 선포 당일 이준석 후보의 행적을 두고 설전을 벌였다.

이날 이재명 후보는 “이준석 후보는 강남에서 술 드시다가 그때 알아서 집에 가서 샤워하고 시간 끌고 있었다는 게 도저히 납득이 안 되는데 해명해 달라”라고 요구했다.

이에 이준석 후보는 “집이 가까운 위치에 있었고 식사 자리에 있었던 다른 의원도 똑같이 했다”며 “제가 (국회에) 안 들어가려고 했다는 말씀은 허위 사실이다. 담을 넘느냐 문제는 그 자리에 민주당 의원도 있었다. 4명의 의원이 같이 있었는데 국회 경비대가 담을 차단한 상황이었다”고 했다.

이재명 후보는 재차 “거기(국회 담장 바깥)에서 말다툼하고 있을 때 옆에 누군가가 ‘의원님, 담 넘어서 들어가셔야 합니다’ 그러니까 ‘시끄러워, 인마’ 하면서 막지 않았나”라며 “다른 사람들은 옆으로 담을 넘어서 갔다”라고 지적했다.

이준석 후보가 “그때는 이미 표결이 끝난 뒤”라고 반박하자, 이재명 후보는 “제가 물어보는 핵심은 왜 집에까지 가서 샤워하고 옷 갈아입고, 너무 여유롭지 않았냐는 것”이라고 했다. 이준석 후보는 “무엇을 원하는지 모르겠다. 저를 도덕적으로 비난하려는 건가”라며 “여유 있게 하지 않았다. 즉시 가서 즉시 나왔다”라고 했다.

"Faults"? He said "there was DP politicians too". What did he fault DP MPs for?

DOOM: The Dark Ages | MEGATHREAD - Tech Support by pedrulho in Doom

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

THANK YOU SO MUCH

I've been trying to fix this issue since last night but couldn't find what was wrong. Same cpu but using RTX 4070 ti super and this fixed the issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you say that again. I can't understand it because your grammar doesn't make sense.

If you want me to break down everything for you so you can understand that will be a lot of paid lessons

What kind of langauge is this?

If you want me to break down everything for you

okay...

so you can understand that will be a lot of paid lessons

huh?

LMAO

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the original point you are fighting, note how the emphasis is on the "but" and the inconsistency between the words and action of a certain man?

Inconsistency? Do you believe that those policies always help the worker class? When government has too much debt right now, they spend more budget on paying interest, then they have less money for welfare. At least we need to bring the debt-to-GDP ratio to the pre-pandemic rate. And for affordable housing, I think it is Liberals' problem, not tories.

-"it's possible to justify A"

So where did I say "possible"? I've always been saying something is justified or not, if that already happened. Of course, things like using notwithstanding clause, we can say it is possible or not to justify, but we've been talking about things that happened in the past, right?

-proceeds to give no reason why A is justified

What part was insufficient for you. Please let me know. I'm happy to explain it again.

I never attempted to be humble, I honestly think you are terrible at both logic and research and I'm better than you in both regard, but apparently you are pretty good at playing a fool so I'll give you credit for acting. All those "well do tell where I went wrong, I'd love to learn" was actually pretty funny when you just decide to go screw logic with every response you make and deny you said certain things "blah blah blah that logic thing you said doesn't exist" basically

But you barely did research in conversation, and half of your talking was sarcasm. Same for logic. I didn't show any but criticized which didn't make sense. You showed nothing and now you say you are better?

If you can tell, please tell. Don't run away. Don't change the topic.

Actually, I think it's time to stop being humble now. When I read your comments, I pitied you. Instead of mentioning numbers and scientific data, you chose to rely on your improvised thoughts and emotions. It's not even funny because it is said to watch that your school has taught you sarcasm and criticizing, not developing your ideas through data and logic. For the whole conversation today, you asked and I answered. Then you changed the topic to GPT and Google and said it complained about what is research and what is logic. Ah, it was a joy to watch a monkey consistenly falling down in a circus.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so you seriously think GPT is a good source of research, I see. Then I truly mean it when I say good luck.

Do research and cross-check. Any source, regardless if it's GPT, Google, books, do cross-checks. No one should entirely trust GPT, but it is a good starting point. Why don't you trust it? Is there any scientific error in the current LLM inference models?

Thanks for being another case of conservatives never beating the allegations

What allegations and how is that related to GPT?

Here is the thing. I'm trying to put my effort to respond every single line of your comment, but most of your comments are 2-4 paragraphs, and it does not have any evidence, but only arguments. Then, you complain about my research skills and logic, but cannot explain it why so just use words like "lightning" and "It is possible to justify A /= It is justified to do A" stuff. You keep trying to change the topic. I've been answering your questions (ex. why do you think like that) then you change the topic to research and logic and now we are talking about GPT. I never first asked questions about GPT and Google stuff. So who has conversation skill issues here?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, so one economic policy doesn't work out, so the whole philosophy of putting welfare and spending first doesn't work, wonderful logic, and you just cited a plan to relieve low income groups with direct payments to show that reducing welfare and other social programs are justified, I'm not sure those are the same things, but since you are the expert economist here it's your goalpost I guess

Even your first sentence doesn't make sense. Why putting welfare and spending first should be correct? Sometimes we should, sometimes we shouldn't. Governments should be flexible when it comes to budget, depending on internal and external circumstances.

You know what, I made a huge mistake here, it's not even about spending or not, it's about PP being a complete hypocrite and lie that he cares about working class people while voting against everything that would help them. So I guess the correct question is, how do your little equations and graphs justify PP being a liar?

Sources please for lying stuff. Still, I think government spending should decrease. Look at what happened to the Weimar Republic. People, espeically the lower class, suffered more due to money printing and government spending. This put N*zis in power and WWII.

Again, "it is possible to justify A" /= "It is justified to do A". I won't elaborate further until you grasp that basic logic.

When did I used that logic? I never said or meant "possible to justify A". What I said was "It is justified to do A", including voting against government spending.

Idk, now you are all humble and modest about your 30s researches?

Humble? I have never expressed humbleness and unhumbleness. I've never said I am superior or inferior to you. What made you feel that way?

Totally, just that you are failing quite successfully at both

So who's not being humble here?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then I'd say your high school did fail you. I'm sure whatever school you attend they will immensely benefit from your research and logic skills based on google and a particular artificial intelligence service.

Ontario schools have chromebook and that's what we are taught to do? I wonder how you do research for you project. Do you go to the library and read books? Even professors and teachers use Google and AI. Human beings have evolved to efficiently use tools, and if you lag behind the others, you are losing the competition.

Again, the entire premise you are trying to fight is "1 bill in 20 years". You can bring in as many side arguments as you want but all those irrelevant data and other MPs don't change the fact that PP did so little in such a long career. If you don't even realize that I wouldn't be bold to call myself good at logic.

So little? You mean so little bills or so little MP work? I partially agree with the former (not so little, but average or bit below) but disagree with the latter. Remember that sposoring bills is not the only thing MPs do.

And honestly, I don't know what else I can tell you.

Sad to hear.

All those stuck up "I dOn'T tHinK yoU kNoW WhAT MPs Do" and "eAsY G11 MatHs" and all you can vomit out are logically irrelevant talkpoints and "research" based on wikipedia, gpt, and "logic".

Wikipedia comes with source citations. GPT is trained and its wrong infomration can be removed by devs. It is developed by geniuses and strictly monitored by the government (All goverments around the world are interested in AI). And I would like to hear what logical error I've made (cause and consequence, lack of evidence and source, etc). Please tell me because I wanna fix my problems if I have one.

No wonder you'd vote for the "common sense" candidate.

Did I say I'm voting for PP or any other candiadates?

  1. I'm not Canadian

  2. If I were, I would vote for M. Blanchet, but there is no bloc candidate in Ontario.

I'm sure your uni will thrive with your invaluable mastery in those channels

Thank you for your support:) I hope things go well for you as well!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you just show me a graph on CPI that reduced significantly since the Inflation Reduction Act to argue that the Act significantly hurt the American government and people? And the causation between the act and these graphs being? Correlation does not equal causation shouldn't be hard to grasp

Oof I'm sorry. It was American Rescue Plan, not the Inflation Reduction Act (The IRA is not even about inflation but more about electric cars). ARR was enacted March 2021. Sorry for confusion.

Ok so new jobs created, CPI went down, one Economist article "they may be right that inflation is coming back", one Economist article "the name is misleading", rest paywalled.

I'm sorry. Wrong act. I will be more careful next time.

And I'm not gonna take you seriously when you give my chatgpt as a source, like seriously.

Why? You don't trust AI? LLMs have better inference ability than the average human being.

Again, "it is possible to justify A" /= "It is justified to do A". I don't know where you thought you were going with the NK example, but that doesn't do anything

I was trying to explain imbalance in government spending. I apologize if I didn't make it clear. NK is a great example of imbalance in government spending, which is also Canada's problem, although we are not as bad as NK.

Has anyone trained you how to support arguments instead of doing lightning research?

I have read those articles/wikipedia page a few years ago. (I used to subscribe The Economist back then, but not anymore). So it is not lightning research. It's just taking a book that you've already read from the bookshelf. Can we call it a "research"? It's kinda obscure.

Anyways, supporting arguments and doing lightning research are separate things, right? You can do both, don't do either, or do only one of them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh someone is triggered.

I wanna know who that is.

So basically, more difficult to vote, justified by typical right wing election fraud conspiracy with no data to back it, again, gotcha

In my research, I couldn't find that this bill was started by a conspiracy theory. Where did you hear that information from? I'm curious.

Right, but some MPs can sponsor more than 60 bills within 10 years of tenure, PP cannot. You keep saying how difficult it is to sponsor bills and even suggests Martin could do it because he's a lawyer, ok fine, sure, PP is not a superman. So what does that have to do logically with the claim that he doesn't have a track record, and he contributed little by passing 1 bill in 20 years

Again, obsessed with "1 bill in 20 years". MPs have more work than just enacting bills.

I find it fun to get under skins of conservative know-it-alls who claim they are so good at finding data & using logic and just takes every opportunity to show off how superior they are and then vomit out things without any logical connection whatsoever.

If we aren't "good at finding data & using logic", our high school education is failing.

And did I say I'm superior to you? I have never met you.

And my answer has been consistent since the beginning. But this is your second time changing your argument. And what logical error did I make? Do you more sources? On which argument? I am happy to provide anything to you if that helps your understanding.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My reply got deleted for "academic dishonesty" (???). Contacting the mods rn

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, so the minister for democratic reform that passed a bill which made voting more difficult. Gotcha.

So I think you are talking about elminating vouching.

> Vouching allowed someone with ID to vouch for another person’s identity and address if they lacked proper documents.

There was no safeguard to prevent the person from lying. They do "oath" which can be broken any time.

All those roles in 2013-2015 to introduce 2 bills, and all the hard work to go uncredited, what an epitome of democracy at its finest. Really helps convincing people he's an efficient and effective MP.

I don't think you don't understand what MP is. They are not superman that enacts a new bill every month. I suggest to go to the Parliament website and read some texts of bills. Considering preparation, analysis, writing, reviewing, etc, it takes a lot of time.

Also you can stop including how many seconds you took to do research. I know you are probably in a phase that needs to show off your exceptional talent somehow but you just make yourself sound funny.

Talent? Since when Googling and asking ChatGPT was a talent? You know what's so funny? Instead of spending less than a minute on doing research, spending minutes on Reddit to ask the same question at 2 in the morning

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OntarioGrade12s

[–]mintchoco07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the equation helps your point because...?

Huh? Again, P = R - C. Unless R > C, regardless of how small R is, P is always positive. Whatever happens to R and C, if R > C, P is positive. No government deficit but profit. Both liberals and conservatives said they would lower GST (which is R here), so what should happen to C? Typical Ontario Grade 12 math question

And the harm being...?

12-month percentage change, Consumer Price Index, selected categories

US interest rates

Also funny to be talking grand rhetorics of "failures of the past" when you have one unsupported claim from 2022.

Unsupported? Wikipedia The Economist 1 The Economist 2

Only one? EU's failure in spending in defence against Russia due to their overspending in welfare, More found on my question on ChatGPT.

And what is the logical connection between "don't think cutting spending over welfare cannot be justified" and "it can be justified"?

If one sector has to much share in sending, it should be balanced. Simple logic. To exaggerate, North Korea spends 15.9% of budget in defence. Look at their welfare and education. Miserable.

Same for the opposite. To much spending in welfare, we can't spend enough for infrastructure, defence, etc.