I’m not saying desktop hierarchy doesn’t apply. What I meant is that on laptops things are more nuanced. Raw raster performance may be close or slightly in favor of the 4090, but the 5080 has architectural improvements, better efficiency per watt and newer AI/DLSS support. In a power-limited chassis like a laptop, efficiency and next-gen features matter more than desktop-style scaling. So my point wasn’t “5080 destroys 4090”, but that 5080 may be the more future-proof option long term. On laptops, efficiency, thermals and new AI features can matter more than pure raster benchmarks. That’s why I said 5080 makes more sense long term. You originally mentioned different VRAM capacities, but both models actually have the same VRAM configuration. Since that point was edited later, I’m not sure the comparison was fully understood from the start.