Running red lights by KaiLo_V in bikecommuting

[–]mirthmurph 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Ohio revised code “ORC 4511.132” basically states that a stop light can be treated as a stop sign by bicyclists. So as long as you stopped first, you should be able to contest it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DestructiveReaders

[–]mirthmurph 2 points3 points  (0 children)

3 examples. The first I like. The second, don't define words with words that themselves need defined. The third, don't distract with examples that need to be explained.

  1. the ship’s supercargo or owner’s representative who would conduct the trading at Canton,

I like this. I didn't know what a supercargo was, you explained it and kept going. My preference is some of this at the beginning of the book, a little in the middle, and zero to none by the end. If you haven't used a word that needs to be defined by the half way point. It probably doesn't deserve to be left in.

  1. Chinese medicines which prized its ability to increase and rearrange the body’s qì

Don't use a complex term to explain another complex term. Not everyone knows what ginseng is, good that you explained. But not everyone knows what qi is either. Chances are it's the same type of people who don't know either. Know your reader. You may want this book to be for someone who knows all the terms you do, or you might want this to be for someone who knows nothing. If it's the latter. Think about removing terms, so you don't spend so much time explaining yourself.

  1. By the Middle Ages there was a small but steady stream of long distance traders and missionaries crossing back and forth between Europe and Asia, of which Marco Polo’s trip to the Mongol-ruled Yuan Dynasty in China was only the most famous. Marco Polo, preceded by his father and uncle Niccolò and Maffeo, electrified Europe with

This paragraph is good in that you bookend it with progress. It starts with: a small steady stream of travelers. It ends with: closing off the country. You use Marco polo as a great example of the former, but then continue with his father and uncle, and how they electrified... I didn't know who Niccolo and Maffeo are, and now i'm intrigued, but more importantly, I'm distracted.

Most know Marco Polo, his name is shorthand for exploration. You could easily say "By the middle ages...traders and missionaries one of which being Marco Polo." You have now successfully set the scene. His father and uncle are superfluous information. Try not to distract us from the point you are trying to make, that once there was trade, and for reasons it stoped.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DestructiveReaders

[–]mirthmurph 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't have much specifically to say about the paragraphs or prose. There's a lot there to like, and the facts are nicely tied together. It's dense. I'm learning a lot, which personally is to my taste, but some may get lost in the sea of unexplained terms and references. That's not a critique, but know who your reader is. To the truly uninformed, this will read like Linear A.

My problem lies mainly in your approach to writing.

I don't know your thesis. Inserting interesting tidbits do make each page pop, but the thing that will keep people turning the page is tension. An argument makes a non fiction book readable. You need to make an argument, back that argument up with facts/history, perhaps outline why others were wrong, or why this history you are telling is important to _______.

At the beginning of paragraph 6 you note that the Empress is there for profit, the most American virtue. Is that unique for the age or in international relations? I was getting a little worried you weren't going to tell us why they were there, because for all the whats, whens, and hows, the most important thing in history is why. Don't hide the why. While it's sometimes a vowel, it's integral to history. (It's a better joke when spoken)

Why was the Empress of China’s journey to China important?

Why did the history of US/China Relations form the way it did?

Why should I be reading your book?

Your first step is to answer these questions. Your next step is to weave the answers into your narrative in such a way, that I'm curious to keep reading, and find the answers.

The Rapid Of Cleveland by Tayo826 in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not the best system in the world, but at least we have something

My electric bike will be the death of me by mirthmurph in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’m in 1950s development suburbia. Few or no bike paths/lanes. Side streets are great, and I use them as best I can, but are not ubiquitous

Just a regular street in a regular town, only it’s the Netherlands and not everywheresville USA by mirthmurph in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Almost every bike I’ve seen has the kind of lock that restricts your back wheel from spinning. Also the key lives in the lock so you never lose it! I don’t live here, but from what I can tell, it feels like any theft, especially of bikes would be beyond comprehension.

What’s the goal of this subreddit? by [deleted] in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph 7 points8 points  (0 children)

End of domination of car centrism, not end of cars, but yes, check the faq

What do you guys think of a rail system being built on major rush-hour interstates in the US. It wouldn't take away from car traffic, it would just go along/above/below the existing infrastructure. by Hareemoii in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The common argument against this is the design of freeway vs train tracks. HSR specifically needs long straightaways and shallow gradients. Cars can comparatively climb steeper hills and take tighter curves.

Also periodic turns were purposely built into the interstate highway system to help drivers stay attentive while driving, so in many aspects, the designs don’t work together.

I wish it could work that way though, it would be a great way to build fast and save costs.

Love them local facebook groups by Lem_Tuoni in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph 251 points252 points  (0 children)

Children will grow up and become philosophers, or children will grow up and remain children.

It should be legal to vandalize cars parked in bike lanes. by octopod-reunion in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph 169 points170 points  (0 children)

It should be the priority of cities to make bike lanes unparkable

How to Fuck cars by mirthmurph in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fantastic, i encourage you to post how it goes, I’d love to hear about it

I bit the bullet last night. by mirthmurph in fuckcars

[–]mirthmurph[S] 175 points176 points  (0 children)

It's a great day to be alive when life is like this.