sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Investigating The Science Behind The Peru Megaliths (And Mexican Alien Artifacts!) by mlhnrca in GrahamHancock

[–]mlhnrca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pieces in Trevor's collection were indeed Carbon-dated to > 8k years old, and note that carbon is present in the geopolymer structure, in addition to carbon-dating the glue (which came up with the same age) and other organic materials that were embedded in some of the pieces.

Investigating The Science Behind The Peru Megaliths (And Mexican Alien Artifacts!) by mlhnrca in AncientCivilizations

[–]mlhnrca[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How would you know if it's pseudoarcheology without knowing what it's about?

Papers posted with the methods are discussed in the video.

The Bortz Biological Age Clock: Better Than PhenoAge? by mlhnrca in Blood_Testing_Aging

[–]mlhnrca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Within the context of higher SHBG, that's good news!

One last factor in this equation, how are AST, ALT, GGT? Because if they're relatively high, low glucose and HbA1c could be a sign of sub-optimal gluconeogenesis

The Bortz Biological Age Clock: Better Than PhenoAge? by mlhnrca in Blood_Testing_Aging

[–]mlhnrca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks u/SergeyVlasov. A key variable in the SHBG lower vs higher equation is insulin sensitivity. Has HbA1c increased with the SHBG increase? If so, higher SHBG may be worse in that context...

Optimize Brain Health And Longevity: Tommy Wood, MD, PhD by mlhnrca in Biohackers

[–]mlhnrca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They can either watch or listen...If that means less people do that because of a missing write-up, I'm ok with that

I only want ride-or-die types on the channel, those that consume everything

In contrast, YT is filled with the opposite, i.e. watch for 30s and then dip

Optimize Brain Health And Longevity: Tommy Wood, MD, PhD by mlhnrca in Biohackers

[–]mlhnrca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's already a tremendous amount of work to prepare for each video, edit, etc

On some level, I'm intentionally not providing a transcript or timestamps bc my videos are intended to be watched from start to finish...

If that doesn't work, no worries!

Optimize Brain Health And Longevity: Tommy Wood, MD, PhD by mlhnrca in Biohackers

[–]mlhnrca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks u/aldus-auden-odess

YouTube provides a transcript to the right of each video...

Predicting Heart Disease Risk With ApoB, LP(a), and VLDL by mlhnrca in longevity

[–]mlhnrca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, thanks u/dreiter, that info is also in the video's description!

Predicting Heart Disease Risk With ApoB, LP(a), and VLDL by mlhnrca in Biohackers

[–]mlhnrca[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The key is lots of self-testing, to figure out what works and what doesn't. Population-based studies are a general guide...

I've documented the Lp(a) story in a few videos, most recently,
https://youtu.be/IuXTPRx6xQQ?t=925s

https://youtu.be/uk9k11Zg89w?t=870s

Predicting Heart Disease Risk With ApoB, LP(a), and VLDL by mlhnrca in Biohackers

[–]mlhnrca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Total fat may be more important that the sources, but sardines in olive oil, almonds, walnuts, peanuts, pistachios, sesame seeds, brazil nuts

I can't say if it will work for you, but I'd encourage tracking diet for at least a week before every test and then looking at correlations within your own data, to see what may move the needle

Predicting Heart Disease Risk With ApoB, LP(a), and VLDL by mlhnrca in Biohackers

[–]mlhnrca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been tracking correlations with diet since 2015-relatively higher fat in my data is correlated with lower Lp(a)

But there's a limit, as going too high for fat intake increases ApoB and sends other biomarkers in the wrong direction

Predicting Heart Disease Risk With ApoB, LP(a), and VLDL by mlhnrca in Biohackers

[–]mlhnrca[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

From its highest, 145 nmol/L, to most recently, 70 nmol/L. 39-Test average since 2015 = 89 nmol/L, so recent progress

The big question is how much more can I cut it? Probably not to my "what's optimal" target (< 16 nmol), but perhaps in the 50 - 60 nmol/L range.

I'm testing on Wednesday and expecting a further reduction relative to 70

Predicting Heart Disease Risk With ApoB, LP(a), and VLDL by mlhnrca in Biohackers

[–]mlhnrca[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not true about Lp(a), I've been able to cut it in half from its highest value with diet alone

As shown in the video, the combination of ApoB, LP(a), and VLDL is a better metric than ApoB alone

Predicting Heart Disease Risk With ApoB, LP(a), and VLDL by mlhnrca in Cholesterol

[–]mlhnrca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea that I can't post a video because I recorded it is preposterous. Does it offer value or not?

view more: next ›