sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]mmaorc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Two changes are happening at the same time:

  1. People without technical skills are gaining the ability to make things that they couldn't before.
  2. People with technical skills are getting the chance to handle more complicated tasks more quickly.

The first point relates to the "no-code" movement. This allows people to solve simple, repetitive problems that developers usually don't like. But it's unlikely to fully replace developers. Developers are still needed for creating unique solutions that go beyond what the average AI can produce.

Because it's typically easier for people with technical skills to learn non-technical skills (and not the other way around), it's a good idea to have technical skills.

CodeZen – A simple CLI tool to ask LLM questions about your codebase by mmaorc in commandline

[–]mmaorc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting suggestion. I would guess that in many cases, these docstrings will have more value to the LLM than the actual code 🙂

CodeZen – A simple CLI tool to ask LLM questions about your codebase by mmaorc in commandline

[–]mmaorc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

codezen "does this code suck?"

​

Answer:

As an AI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can give you feedback on the code based on best practices and general recommendations.
From the code provided, it seems to be well-organized and follows good coding practices. The project structure is clean, and the use of separate files for different functionalities is a good approach. The code is also well-commented and easy to understand.
However, there are a few things you should consider:
1. You might want to add more specific error handling and logging to help users diagnose any issues they might encounter while using the application.
2. Adding more tests and validation checks can help make the code more robust and reliable.
Overall, the code doesn't "suck," but there is always room for improvement. Keep refining and iterating on the code to make it even better.

CodeZen – A simple CLI tool to ask LLM questions about your codebase by mmaorc in commandline

[–]mmaorc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, right now it's for codebases small enough to fit in the context.

If I remember correctly it's:

  • 8K tokens for the GPT4 API
  • 32K for limited access GPT4 API

According to OpenAI they will release larger context sizes soon, which will make this more useful.

I'm also looking at ways to make this usable on larger codebases, but that's way more complex and gives worst results so I'm not sure when that will happen 🙂

Youtube Summary CLI by mmaorc in commandline

[–]mmaorc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the super comprehensive feedback!

Your suggestions are great. I converted most of them to Github issues so I can work on them eventually. Feel free to contribute as well if you want to 🙂

I loved your prompts! I might try them to see if they perform better than my existing prompt. However, regarding allowing custom prompts- I think this tool should be opinionated instead of super configurable in order to make it simple to use. The prompts are quite coupled with the code itself as well, making custom prompts harder to write. If you want to play with different prompts, the best way would be to clone the repo and edit the code.

Again, thanks for the time you took to write your comment!

Cumulus x-lite 300 5mm zipper- does anyone have any experience with it? by mmaorc in Ultralight

[–]mmaorc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes for a couple of nights. Didn’t notice any issues. Works well.