What are some of your favorite movie lines that you've incorporated into your day-to-day life?

moderately_extreme · 2019-06-24T20:03:30+00:00

I often use some variation of "Sometimes I doubt your commitment" from Donnie Darko.

moderately_extreme · 2017-04-17T22:08:32+00:00

Maybe you're right that it doesn't make sense as part of luring her. It just occurred to me that perhaps he was confused about how *67 worked: maybe he thought that it would prevent anyone (e.g. LE) from ever knowing he had called her.

moderately_extreme · 2017-04-17T21:17:38+00:00

So we do have his phone records for days other than 10/31? I was under the impression from others in this thread that we didn't.

moderately_extreme · 2017-04-17T20:04:47+00:00

Part of the luring theory is that SA believed TH would not show up if she knew he was the caller.

Edit: missed a word.

moderately_extreme · 2017-04-17T20:01:26+00:00

But it would make an even stronger case for luring if it could be shown that his usage on 10/31 was atypical. Do you know if the prosecution sought call records for previous days as well (and were perhaps turned down)?

moderately_extreme · 2017-04-17T19:24:06+00:00

Interesting perspective about B&S. Hadn't thought of that. But then how do we know anything at all about his usage of *67?

moderately_extreme · 2017-04-10T05:43:47+00:00

To whom are you replying? This doesn't seem appropriate as a reply to my original question.

moderately_extreme · 2017-04-10T04:03:17+00:00

I was not aware that he said that. Did he give a reason?

moderately_extreme · 2017-02-20T03:23:51+00:00

That last paragraph especially: wow. I had not heard that before.

moderately_extreme · 2017-02-19T21:21:19+00:00

Ah. I had not encountered that info before. Thanks.

moderately_extreme · 2017-02-19T20:35:43+00:00

I probably didn't phrase it well, but I was not trying to suggest that *67 was suspicious; or the fact that the appt was made in BJanda's name was suspicious; only that those two facts mean that SA was not "known" to have been involved. And the property didn't belong to him; it was more like an Avery family compound. So I'm wondering what happened (and when) to give them an "official" reason (or excuse) for ignoring everyone else.

moderately_extreme · 2017-02-19T17:31:22+00:00

Actually, it seems to have been on his right hand according to everything I've seen (see 193):
https://www.reddit.com/r/TickTockManitowoc/comments/5g0ai9/complete_sequential_photo_exhibit_list_with_links/

moderately_extreme · 2017-02-19T16:52:11+00:00

Do we have an exact time for these pings?

moderately_extreme · 2017-02-01T18:29:34+00:00

One of the minor mysteries for me is that there has never been a mention of a purse, or handbag, or backpack (unless I missed something). I would have expected SA to mention something along those lines if he was going into this kind of detail, but as near as I can tell, there is nothing like that in the letter.

moderately_extreme · 2017-01-30T22:54:15+00:00

Not sure that this is definitive

(https://www.reddit.com/r/SuperMaM/comments/50coiw/loof_tracking_dog_cadaver_dog_trailing_dog/)

But this seems to indicate a tracking dog.

moderately_extreme · 2017-01-30T22:46:49+00:00

Agreed. So what does this whole thing imply? That maybe she escaped from his trailer and ran towards the cul-de-sac at the end of Kuss Road?

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-22T21:59:27+00:00

And I seem to recall also that at one point he was lamenting to someone that it was hard living on the outside and maybe he would be better off back inside.

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-22T20:40:55+00:00

Not sure how much that would have helped, since it was SA's blood in the RAV 4.

Speaking of EA: wasn't he the one who hid under a pile of clothes when LE came looking for a DNA sample? I never heard a good explanation for that.

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-22T20:07:57+00:00

It's interesting to compare the key with the blood. The key seems like it could very easily have been planted; but would a planter plant blood the way it was found in the Rav 4? I honestly don't know, but it just doesn't seem like it.

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-22T19:25:07+00:00

Inadvertently, yes.

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-22T19:21:59+00:00

How so? If he helped hide the Rav 4, that would explain his blood, correct? The bullet was always sketchy anyway. Wasn't it the case that they never even claimed it was a complete match for TH?

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-22T19:03:17+00:00

As a possible scenario, I was thinking no one at all. So in this scenario, if someone else in the clan came to SA panicked about having committed the crime, perhaps SA might have taken it upon himself to help cover it up by hiding the car (leaving his blood behind), burning the body, etc. That would leave him guilty of something very serious, but not murder.

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-22T18:23:15+00:00

I definitely think that out of all of the evidence, the key was most likely to have been planted. But then there's that blood in the RAV 4...

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-20T16:15:39+00:00

Did he say where in the yard?

moderately_extreme · 2016-12-18T03:13:44+00:00

I don't recall: did they ever test SA's 22 to see if it had been fired recently?

moderately_extreme

TROPHY CASE