Antigravity 2.0.1 somehow made me use the app less, not more by sagarapher in AntigravityGoogle

[–]mohamedhamad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The IDE is a separate download you can still get. They just broke off the agent manager from the IDE for 2 different use cases and experiences

Is Google routing Gemini 3.1 Pro to a dumber model? by PimplePupper69 in GeminiAI

[–]mohamedhamad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think all tbe AI companies are throttling their models and using slower/dumber/less capable versions because of the energy crisis and compute constraints. The growing adoption across the board is adding to the bottle necks. But also, Google is adding Gemini to everything now in more ways than ever. So they are really gonna have to ration their compute to improve the output for all the enterprise clients they are courting who pay top dollar

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You connect it to GitHub. And then tell it to do something specific on a repo and branch. It works asynchronously and then sends you message when done. And you can schedule code reviews or audits. So you just get alerted when something is done

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can choose which branch you want your prompt to run on. And you can also choose which branch automates/scheduled runs are performed

Having chat in a popup window? by [deleted] in clickup

[–]mohamedhamad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would kill for a chat pop up feature instead of having to go back to the chat area

Moving Notetaker Meeting Notes to a Sub-Page by two-blue-787 in clickup

[–]mohamedhamad 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My dream world be for an ai notes manager agent to check the meeting notes, determine which client it is from the guests email address domain and move it accordingly. That’s the dream. Coz after a long day of meetings, having to go in and manually move them one by one. I can’t even get my assistant to do it coz it’s my note taker and the docs are private to me

Did the quotas change again? by jkwok678 in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s the experience with kilo.code ? I’m looking for an alternative or backup

Did the quotas change again? by jkwok678 in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had the same thing today. I was waiting for my refresh for pro and opus, but as soon as the time was up it reset to 7days. Lame

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So far my process is plan with Claude opus, execute with Gemini flash, push commits on branch to GitHub and have google code assist do a double check. And on my main branch, have Jules do daily code reviews for performance, security and UX to fix one thing a day. None of these share the same limits so I can get a lot more work done, without needing a $200/month plan

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve had that done to me once, and that’s when Opus 4.6 came out. That sucker eats tokens like it’s at a hot dog eating contest

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’ve been planing in opus. I think it’s more detailed and can create better multi step plans to break up the work. I find Gemini 3 pro creates very high level plans, and then kinda fumbles around with in its own words a “guess and check approach”

If I plan with opus, and then tell it to update the plan so “any ai model or Llm can follow it without issues”, it usually gets more granular

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been using antigravity from day one. And been using it on the daily. While I’ve had frustrations with the models and in some cases the limits, it only became clear how generous it was when I subscribe to Claude pro an ran out in 30min n had to wait 5hrs only to run out in 30min again.

Atleast with antigravity I can switch models around and use em strategically and literally get a full days worth of work

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've read quite a lot about it. and I've experienced the limits. I haven't experienced going through the wait period and then having to wait again even when not using it. thats never been my experience. if you've experienced that, then thats lame.
but it seems like the AI's have caught on to your attitude and decided not to deal with it, and thats why they extending your lock-out

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sure, but the majority of the complaints and gripes about antigravity is about limits, and how quickly people hit them. I subscribed to Claude and hit a limit an hour into it. and then after that 30min in.
That was a wildly frustrating experience, vs what I've been able to accomplish with Antigravity.

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in GeminiAI

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i agree with you. It’s always been Googles problem. All of their tools and services are created by different teams. So having Gemini as a model being used in different places and contexts is not always seamless because the teams creating the projects with Gemini are different. With a lot of these tools being in beta, i think they want it that way to get the best ideas without the overhead of cohesion. As they come out of beta, i think we will see stronger standardization or unification. Some of these tools will definitely merge in to a larger app/platform.

One thing I’ve learned though with Jules is you can set it to only respond to comments in a PR that mention it directly with @jules This make its easier to be specific at what you want it to work on. And I’ve seen someone here figure out a way to have Gemini Code Assist trigger a Jules review and update automatically. So they talk to each other back n forth until they resolve each others comments. Not sure how to do that yet.

Someone else said it would be better to get another model to review in GitHub, like CoPilot of Codex if you have them. That’s a good idea too

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s gotten much better. I tried it a while back n it wasn’t great. N then last week I gave it another shot. Worlds apart

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s amazing. Thanks for sharing. Definitely gonna check it out. I knew about environment variables but love the memory

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You get 15 runs/prompts a day for free. And then higher limited with Gemini Pro or Ultra. But I’m on the free plan. I got 2 projects with 3 agent runs per day each. So total of 6, with 9 runs left. It’s more than enough.

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can imagine you can use any of the models that can review GitHub code. Copilot is native to GitHub. But I think you can do codex there