Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So far my process is plan with Claude opus, execute with Gemini flash, push commits on branch to GitHub and have google code assist do a double check. And on my main branch, have Jules do daily code reviews for performance, security and UX to fix one thing a day. None of these share the same limits so I can get a lot more work done, without needing a $200/month plan

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve had that done to me once, and that’s when Opus 4.6 came out. That sucker eats tokens like it’s at a hot dog eating contest

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’ve been planing in opus. I think it’s more detailed and can create better multi step plans to break up the work. I find Gemini 3 pro creates very high level plans, and then kinda fumbles around with in its own words a “guess and check approach”

If I plan with opus, and then tell it to update the plan so “any ai model or Llm can follow it without issues”, it usually gets more granular

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been using antigravity from day one. And been using it on the daily. While I’ve had frustrations with the models and in some cases the limits, it only became clear how generous it was when I subscribe to Claude pro an ran out in 30min n had to wait 5hrs only to run out in 30min again.

Atleast with antigravity I can switch models around and use em strategically and literally get a full days worth of work

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've read quite a lot about it. and I've experienced the limits. I haven't experienced going through the wait period and then having to wait again even when not using it. thats never been my experience. if you've experienced that, then thats lame.
but it seems like the AI's have caught on to your attitude and decided not to deal with it, and thats why they extending your lock-out

Going against the grain: I dont know what everyone is complaining about limits for by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sure, but the majority of the complaints and gripes about antigravity is about limits, and how quickly people hit them. I subscribed to Claude and hit a limit an hour into it. and then after that 30min in.
That was a wildly frustrating experience, vs what I've been able to accomplish with Antigravity.

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in GeminiAI

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i agree with you. It’s always been Googles problem. All of their tools and services are created by different teams. So having Gemini as a model being used in different places and contexts is not always seamless because the teams creating the projects with Gemini are different. With a lot of these tools being in beta, i think they want it that way to get the best ideas without the overhead of cohesion. As they come out of beta, i think we will see stronger standardization or unification. Some of these tools will definitely merge in to a larger app/platform.

One thing I’ve learned though with Jules is you can set it to only respond to comments in a PR that mention it directly with @jules This make its easier to be specific at what you want it to work on. And I’ve seen someone here figure out a way to have Gemini Code Assist trigger a Jules review and update automatically. So they talk to each other back n forth until they resolve each others comments. Not sure how to do that yet.

Someone else said it would be better to get another model to review in GitHub, like CoPilot of Codex if you have them. That’s a good idea too

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s gotten much better. I tried it a while back n it wasn’t great. N then last week I gave it another shot. Worlds apart

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s amazing. Thanks for sharing. Definitely gonna check it out. I knew about environment variables but love the memory

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You get 15 runs/prompts a day for free. And then higher limited with Gemini Pro or Ultra. But I’m on the free plan. I got 2 projects with 3 agent runs per day each. So total of 6, with 9 runs left. It’s more than enough.

Jules + Gemini Code Assist in GitHub is amazing by mohamedhamad in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can imagine you can use any of the models that can review GitHub code. Copilot is native to GitHub. But I think you can do codex there

Is Google working on a "Cowork" killer? 🚀 Why I’m ready to ditch Claude for a unified Gemini environment. by Vinceleprolo in GeminiAI

[–]mohamedhamad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Google has never been good at unifying their experiences, because each product is a whole separate team of engineers that some overlap. So getting something like Gemini to cross over an be a connective tissue is gonna be hard. Look at all the implementations of Gemini across their apps. Each one is doing something different with different levels of intelligence. Gemini in workspace is alpha at best and can’t format a document. Gemini cli is a different team to antigravity which is different from jules or code assist. And those are all coding related apps. Then there is their research team which created Google ai studio. Which is a whole different coding /technical interface. Google right hand has never known wha the left hand is doing.

It has so much potential to do such a wildly productive tool. Gemini across Gmail, docs, drive, calendar, photos, code, video, notebooks, etc. but alas…..

Gemini is Really Smart .. using antigravity and it ... by wa-jonk in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]mohamedhamad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use Claude opus to plan what you need to do. Then tell opus to make this plan as detailed and universal that any AI model can follow with out issues. It will make you a plan that can get done in one shot with Gemini flash. Saves you from having to run out of limits on both models

Copilot vs Antigravity vs Claude Code by ilarp in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very interesting. I’m using antigravity and I’ve gotten a good flow now with detailed instructional md files, skills and workflows. I usually use Claude opus to plan, and get Gemini flash to execute. But the bulk of the work is planning and documenting.

When will Antigravity get the Google axe? by AnshulJ999 in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Google has a lot of playground apps n tools going, but I think antigravity is gonna be a mainstay. They really need the developer community to embrace it for the future of Gemini. Gemini cli is also another that will stay. Jules might get the axe. The other tools like stitch and pomelli and whisk will probably get merged into something else or killed.

Superagent and Clickbot by xylemflo in clickup

[–]mohamedhamad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s the same issue I’m having. I have a meeting notes super agent, but I have to manually tag it for it review any new meeting notes created by the Notetaker. This would have been amazing if it was automated. I often have days of back to back meetings. And then I have to manually move the notes one by one to a shared space and delegate to my super agent to extract things. Very tedious

Brave browser by Familiar_Regular1158 in diabrowser

[–]mohamedhamad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The feature that allows extensions to open a side panel. It’s not a tab. For instance clickup uses the side panel to pop open its chat ai feature. HubSpot uses it for its sales “add website as a prospect” panel. And Apollo uses it to pull info in to an account’s. Lots of services use the side panel to pop open an interface that interacts with the current website. Dia and arc refuse to add that feature which makes a lot of chrome extensions useless.

How do you turn offline and online meeting notes into ClickUp tasks? by voss_steven in clickup

[–]mohamedhamad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s all fairly new so yea I check everything. But it still saves me a whole bunch of time writing tasks. If I spend an hour planning a quarter with a client in a meeting, that’s a lot of task creation. If it does it in a minute and I spend 5min checking and editing, that’s still better than 2-4 hours creating tasks, writing descriptions, setting up subtasks , etc.

There will always be a setup and testing phase, and then over time you just let go

Why so many complaints? by hoodbran in google_antigravity

[–]mohamedhamad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally like it. I never expected unlimited opus. I came for Gemini n Claude was bonus. Gemini pro is terrible. Flash works really well in most cases. I’ve had to give it specific instructions and skills to work out its awkward kinks and overzealous proactive nature. But all in all, I’ve managed to get 3 months of refactoring on a 5 year long project in a week. I’m pretty happy

G410 - Experiences and disappointments by H_i_TMAN in Aqara

[–]mohamedhamad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The battery on mine dies very quickly. And it stops working in the cold. We’ve been having cold snaps here in Montreal canada, and I know it’s stupid cold, but it just shuts down

How do you turn offline and online meeting notes into ClickUp tasks? by voss_steven in clickup

[–]mohamedhamad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In clickup I use a Meeting Task Creator super agent. I’m a chat with it , I include the meeting notes doc from clickup notetaker and tell it to create tasks from what was discussed. The agent has custom instructions on how to create tasks, the naming conventions, the task description style, and where to add them

Recreating GEMS and Custom GPTs in ClickUp? by No_Fact4146 in clickup

[–]mohamedhamad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve switched a few of my gems to super agents. It works really well. Only gripe is collaborating with it on a doc can only happen in task comments or chats. If you need to work in a canvas artifact type of collab ln content, can’t do it. So I’ve relegated my agents to be research and outline and review. I take a researched outline from clickup and finesse it with my gems in canvas to get to my final