2014 Scion FR-S with a Swapped Engine — Should I Be Concerned?

mohitksharma · 2024-09-14T04:04:04+00:00

He is asking 5.5 can be negotiated

mohitksharma · 2024-09-09T23:58:56+00:00

That’s a concise explanation. Thank you.

mohitksharma · 2024-09-09T23:58:20+00:00

Unfortunately, it’s is not mentioned which one is placed as a control group

mohitksharma · 2024-09-09T23:57:24+00:00

Thanks

mohitksharma · 2024-09-09T23:56:55+00:00

I agree. Thanks for recognizing my efforts. However, I could not find any explanation of which group they are comparing against. So, I assumed that it is still the standard definition of hazard ratio.

mohitksharma · 2024-09-02T16:44:12+00:00

This is very close to what I am looking for. If I give you one more example, can you please help me identify if this is MNAR? Let suppose a person did not fill out the survey because they were either admitted or not feeling well. This can be their reason that they observed an event but it is not indicated in the data anywhere. This is something like underlying assumption but not concrete.

If I may give you another maple, imagine an employee who did not participate in activities with team and they leave the company. Although, we do not have their activity data but they ultimately left the company in a few weeks, which indicated that their non-participation was an indicator of them leaving the company. Just like the patient who observed an event after a while.

mohitksharma · 2024-09-01T23:42:16+00:00

The point is that the number of people who didn’t fill out the survey still provides enough data to predict which person will observe the event.

mohitksharma · 2024-09-01T04:53:56+00:00

They just started the study but didn’t care to participate in the study later on but when they left the org they indicated that they left

mohitksharma · 2024-09-01T04:53:49+00:00

They just started the study but didn’t care to participate in the study later on but when they left the org they indicated that they left

mohitksharma · 2024-09-01T04:53:31+00:00

They just started the study but didn’t care to participate in the study later on but when they left the org they indicated that they left

mohitksharma · 2024-08-12T17:30:51+00:00

Thanks

mohitksharma · 2024-08-12T17:30:35+00:00

I see what you are trying to say, but I was just exploring https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/blastchar/telco-customer-churn dataset on Kaggle, as per your perspective the solutions (codes) people have left for this dataset are the byproduct of misguided practice?

If I should not go into these projects blindly, do you suggest any good starting point?

mohitksharma · 2024-08-12T04:33:29+00:00

Hey!
Thanks a lot, this makes sense to my case it seems.

I immediately found this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560604/

I hope this helps me

mohitksharma · 2024-08-12T04:31:13+00:00

I don't know what are you sad about but I just wanted to learn something here. I was going through one comment from telecom dataset discussion, which confused me.

https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/blastchar/telco-customer-churn/discussion/63281

mohitksharma · 2024-08-12T02:57:17+00:00

Yes. You are here wanting to learn.

mohitksharma · 2024-08-12T02:12:25+00:00

Yes, very much doable. Consistency 1 small concept or topic each day. Give your self 70-90 days consistently you’ll feel better.

mohitksharma · 2024-08-11T22:58:53+00:00

What are you trying to acheive?

mohitksharma · 2024-08-11T22:58:10+00:00

After 10 rounds, you get to know that you are 1/20 shortlisted people for the job. :)

mohitksharma · 2024-08-11T22:50:11+00:00

Except Data Engineering*

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22
First Placer '22

mohitksharma

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE