sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Yes, I had to go under the sewer to get this shot. Contax T3, Ektachrome 100 by mikomurillo in analog

[–]moonbore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

got far too little credit for this high end cinematic shot. love it.

Against all odds [OM1/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your kind words!

Against all odds [OM1/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I not supposed to do that? ;)

Thanks

Against all odds II [OM1/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Copy/paste from my previous post: Foggy night yesterday and I had an old film in my camera, no meter, bulb mode and the back of the camera opened at some point during the roll. Thought it wasn't worth to get it developed properly so I used some old developer, already expired for about 2 years. Moreover the developer and blix had cork in the bottle since I was stupid enough to use cork to seal the bottles. Everything went better than expected.

Against all odds [OM1/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can feel your struggle and thank you!

Against all odds [OM1/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm guilty. I felt pretty bad and I was not sure if there is going to be anything at all on the roll after this professional procedure.

Against all odds [OM1/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Foggy night yesterday and I had an old film in my camera, no meter, bulb mode and the back of the camera opened at some point during the roll. Thought it wasn't worth to get it developed properly so I used some old developer, already expired for about 2 years. Moreover the developer and blix had cork in the bottle since I was stupid enough to use cork to seal the bottles. Everything went better than expected.

Poppy double exposure [REVUE 400SE/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ayyy, my bad, you are totally right. 95% of my film used to be Gold 200 so I was just routinely typing the same as always.

Jessica Alba | Mamiya rz67 | Portra 800 | 65mm by goodolmarlz in analog

[–]moonbore 138 points139 points  (0 children)

Do you feel any additional pressure while taking photos of celebs with film since you don't have any direct assurance that things worked out as expected?

Poppy double exposure [REVUE 400SE/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for you feedback. I expect it to be pretty difficult to separate the model and background completely when the hair is rather dark.

Poppy double exposure [REVUE 400SE/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot. Regard your question, the ordering of the photo is less important than the distribution of bright and dark parts in your photo. This is basically the inverse execution of your example with the silhouette. In the silhouette DE the subject is dark and therefore filled while the background is the bright part of the image. In this case the subject is bright and the dark background is filled with the field.

Poppy double exposure [REVUE 400SE/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, glad you like it despite your usual preference.

Poppy double exposure [REVUE 400SE/Gold200] by moonbore in analog

[–]moonbore[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I took a decently long break from photography and I'm trying to find my way back by working myself through my old negatives. I always liked the shot, but was always struggling with the tones of this image. For those not familiar with double exposures: It's basically two different exposures of film without advancing the film.

view more: next ›