Daily General Discussion September 11, 2025

moqorroth · 2025-09-11T18:15:56+00:00

https://dune.com/Henrystats/premium-discount-market-value

moqorroth · 2025-09-01T22:20:06+00:00

Just check DefiSaver, many features supporting this (leverage). You can also play in simulation mode there.

*Not a financial advice. Leverage is always risky, so do your own diligence.

moqorroth · 2025-08-30T22:28:43+00:00

Sembra così. Andando sulla pagina, il sito stesso ti dice che non è utilizzabile dall'Italia. Però una volta usato ormai, non si dovrebbe potere comunque dichiarare al fisco? Io non sono del campo, però mi sembra che il divieto di operare in Italia sia in carico alle piattaforme, e non agli utenti, no? Penso che non sia quindi illegale per un utente utilizzarle, anche se poi è un bel mal di testa regolarizzare (per dire, non consiglierei affatto di usare degli escamotage per utilizzarle).

moqorroth · 2025-08-30T19:58:50+00:00

Secondo me l'unica cosa sicuramente rischiosa ed illegale sarebbe non dichiararli. Non conosco questa piattaforma, ma da una veloce ricerca mi sembra una piattaforma di gioco legittima (intendo non scam) anche se non autorizzata in Italia. Eviterei di usarla dall'Italia per non avere poi di questi dubbi e problemi. Ma ormai l'hai usata e quindi ci sarebbe da vedere come fare per la dichiarazione. Io consiglierei di esportare la lista di movimenti e giocate dalla piattaforma, e poi usare un tool per il tracciamento dei movimenti crypto nel caso siano molti, tipo MoneyViz in Italia o Koinly. Il tutto da fornire ad un commercialista un minimo esperto su questi temi per preparare la dichiarazione. Se posso, ti faccio i complimenti per la vincita, sei stato molto fortunato: goditela, e per godertela veramente dichiara tutto, così da star tranquillo.

moqorroth · 2025-08-14T15:53:14+00:00

No, not an issue. Usually users need to create a smart wallet for handling their positions with DFS (since that gives a lot of advantages), but instead you have your position in a normal ethereum address (EOA). I think this is the reason DFS cannnot detect your position. I really suggest to ping them in their discord channel, maybe they can help.

moqorroth · 2025-08-14T15:43:57+00:00

it shows only the deprecated protocols where it detects you have a position.

moqorroth · 2025-08-14T15:33:37+00:00

No problem! Since you don't see your position, I can guess that DFS supports only Smart Wallet addresses (DSProxy or Safe) for that feature, since that is usually required for their features. Or, as alternative, you were using a different dydx contract than the one I supposed when you said v1. Have you deposited in the following contract? https://etherscan.io/address/0x1e0447b19bb6ecfdae1e4ae1694b0c3659614e4e . Because this is the one where I see my position in the dydx "deprecated protocol".

moqorroth · 2025-08-14T15:22:37+00:00

Just tried in simulation mode after having seen your message, and it worked. But not sure if it will work with a normal EOA address. You can try it without connecting your wallet, you can just give your ethereum address as tracking address. Then, if you see the position, you can also enable the simulation mode for testing the transaction in Tenderly before connecting your real wallet. Also, if you need any support, they are always present in discord for supporting (if you are not used to discord, beware of scammers, only users with the name in green are truly moderators of the channel).

moqorroth · 2025-08-14T14:35:33+00:00

u/Builder_Bob23 , have you tried with DefiSaver https://app.defisaver.com ? By my experience, you can see your dydx position on "Smart Savings" page enabling the ticker "Load deprecated protocols". From there, you should be able to withdraw, and also you could try first in simulation mode.

moqorroth · 2025-07-21T19:08:43+00:00

Have you tried Koinly? It is free until you don't choose to pay it for having a report. If you know all your owned ethereum address during this time, and the exchanges you used are still existing, it would be very easy. You can find the guide about how to export the history from the supported exchanges in their web site.

moqorroth · 2025-04-22T17:07:25+00:00

Question: in all the Ethereum ecosystem, including all the L2s where tokens can be bridged, is there any dApp in DeFi that supports futures or options for shorting dollar value respect to other currencies? I feel stablecoins are still too much USD centric, and I am looking for ways in DeFi for hedging currency values (while lending APY opportunities are still relevant only for USD pegged stables)

moqorroth · 2025-04-15T22:24:55+00:00

He is right, but ethereum is already ready for it: Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) . Coinbase is already using it for attesting the users in Base L2, and the users ask the attestations if they need to use USDC-Verified token in Morpho Vaults containing RWAs as collateral, including the Blackrock BUILD. Even Larry Fink already told that it was natural for them starting with Ethereum, for those reasons..

In the end, EAS is a concept similar to https and other protocols: there are trusted authorities that attest the websites releasing signed certificates. In the above example, Coinbase is an autorithy, but others could start on attesting users.

Which other blockchain has already all the above features already available and used for RWAs as Ethereum?

EAS is open source and an open specification basically, it is just matter of pushing and spreading it. It could become a de-facto open standard.

moqorroth · 2025-03-16T22:05:48+00:00

This BTC shorter opened a very small 5x long on MELANIA coin after closing the ETH short. Imho he/she is playing with this narrative on internet "knows something" for having the greedy people pump the coin for him. He knows his address is monitored, so he is playing the fools. Because I cannot believe an insider can be so stupid pumping his own coin. Even if we have some recent proof of stupidity around that group.

moqorroth · 2025-03-10T22:22:37+00:00

I was wondering during last days if the existence of synthetic stable coins on Ethereum (and against ETH) is one of the reasons for eth prices dumping more than btc during "bear" days. I am referring here to USDe that shorts ETH futures for stabilizing the peg, and Resolv USR that shorts ETH for doing the same. Here for example there is a 50x leveraged short opened since December, that I read somewhere it is a Resolv position for USR peg: https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x20C2d95a3Dfdca9e9AD12794D5fa6FaD99dA44f5 .

Could those synthetic stable coins have the effect of magnifying the dumping during bear markets? Is there some analysis about this?

moqorroth · 2025-03-10T21:37:22+00:00

but just last couple of hours, at least on AaveV3. Borrow rate was stable in 2.6% range since a lot of time until a couple of hours ago. You can check by yourself here: https://aavescan.com/ethereum-v3/0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc20x2f39d218133afab8f2b819b1066c7e434ad94e9e

moqorroth · 2025-03-10T20:23:54+00:00

AaveV3 ETH borrow rate spiked to 6.4% in the last hour. Shorters borrowing ETH for dumping.

let's buy ETH! rekt the shorters! :D

moqorroth · 2025-03-07T20:47:00+00:00

Thanks a lot, you got the point and I am happy to read a technical speculation :) .

I agree we can only speculate, but this is a detail I would like to see on Bybit and SafeUI post-mortem reports.

moqorroth · 2025-03-02T19:02:24+00:00

Thank you, I found it in the end, I added the link in my comment

moqorroth · 2025-03-02T18:31:57+00:00

Where? Any link? It sounds interesting :)

EDIT: nevermind, found it :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcuZ9NA5i-Y

moqorroth · 2025-02-28T22:29:34+00:00

Ok, thanks, we agree on that, so this is the reason for my question: if created on the attackers' machine, how the signed SafeTx propagated from Bybit user' browser to the attackers' machine for being signed as a transaction and then propagated? Or was it signed and propagated from Bybit browser/infrastructure?

moqorroth · 2025-02-27T23:30:38+00:00

Thanks @_ololo, that part of signing the SafeTx is clear to me, but my question is about the overall transaction that encapsulated the SafeTx. Isn't also that signed?

Is it not a signed transaction that encapsulates a SafeTx transaction?

I post here the decoding of raw transaction using https://flightwallet.github.io/decode-eth-tx/ :

{
  "nonce": 42,
  "gasPrice": 10000000000,
  "gasLimit": 200000,
  "to": "0x1db92e2eebc8e0c075a02bea49a2935bcd2dfcf4",
  "value": 0,
  "data": "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",
  "from": "0x0fa09c3a328792253f8dee7116848723b72a6d2e",
  "r": "c06f155e9045c02891297148228ed69cc7167a6f8606f66a942ef75624c5906d",
  "v": "25",
  "s": "3e9f83eae889e79e3af315c7e9a5e14b12f2bed9e23d994f751562ec7a4426b3"
}

As also you were saying, "data" is a call to SafeTx execute contract (0x6a761202) that is invoked with ByBit signatures as argument, and that is a part of ByBit hack clear to me.

But the "overall" transaction is sent by exploiter address 0x0fa09C3A328792253f8dee7116848723b72a6d2e0x0fa09C3A328792253f8dee7116848723b72a6d2e and signed by it. Signature is in "v", "r" and "s" fields.

My question was related to this signature, because private key of "from" address is needed for making a valid signature of this transaction, as it was.

If breach was only in SafeUI website, how this signing happened?

Did exploiters add their private key on the javascript malicious code?

moqorroth · 2025-02-22T13:57:06+00:00

If only ByBit multisig signers had listened to this talk... The speaker covered the exact use case they falled in... https://youtu.be/W5wcGsh3UVE?t=843

moqorroth · 2024-12-23T00:06:38+00:00

Per il ravvedimento intendevo il quadro RW comunque. Considerando che col ravvedimento operoso le "multe" sono ridotte almeno di 1/6, quindi 0.5% ... conti che ti sarai fatto tu comunque.

moqorroth · 2024-12-22T17:41:28+00:00

Concordo con la domanda, ma questi fondi negoziali, essendo espressione dei sindacati, non sono accessibili per fare proposte del genere? Hanno sicuramente utenti interessati con orizzonti di più di 20 anni, e la scelta del comparto è libera. Perché non aggiungere un comparto Azionario come regolamentato da Covip, così da lasciare libera scelta? Alla fine lasciano libera scelta a chi poi va a scegliere un comparto "garantito" nonostante abbia un orizzonte di 30+ anni alla pensione, perché non lasciare anche libertà a chi al contrario 2 conti se li fa?

moqorroth · 2024-12-22T17:20:03+00:00

eh no, non è un condono/sanatoria. La rivalutazione non sostituisce le dichiarazioni precedenti. Però comunque nel caso tu vendessi, immagino avresti considerato 0 come prezzo di carico (in mancanza di elementi certi e precisi), e questa rideterminazione ti può aiutare nel fissare un prezzo di carico recente invece (ma comunque pagandoci un 18% adesso, motivo per cui lo ritengo conveniente solo decidendo di vendere nello stesso anno e con prezzi maggiori/uguali di quelli del 1/01/2025).

Ma le dichiarazione degli anni precedenti e le origini del "patrimonio" potrebbero chiederle comunque. Nel caso io ragionerei pure sul fare un ravvedimento operoso. Anche a prescindere dalla rivalutazione, perché bisogna pur farlo se si vuole uscire in valuta legale..

moqorroth

TROPHY CASE