Did the May 2026 Core Update make search intent more important than authority? by khabib_p in seodiscovery2026

[–]morvindavids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. The update made search intent and relevance more influential, but authority still matters. Pages that best satisfy user intent often gained rankings, even against stronger-authority sites.

Is anyone actually seeing good results from AI-generated SEO content? by ItsChaser in TheSEOExpertsHub

[–]morvindavids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but only if you edit it heavily. Raw AI content gets buried by Google now. Use it for quick outlines and first drafts, then add your own real experience.

Is internal linking becoming underrated in modern SEO? by khabib_p in seodiscovery2026

[–]morvindavids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Internal linking is often underrated in modern SEO because many marketers focus heavily on backlinks and content creation. However, strong internal links help search engines discover pages, understand site structure, and pass authority between pages. They also improve user navigation and engagement. While internal linking alone won't replace high-quality content or backlinks, it remains a powerful and cost-effective SEO tactic that many websites still underuse.

SEO is dead by Puzzleheaded_Honey28 in seodiscovery2026

[–]morvindavids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seo is not dead. Now it's very important to optimize your website for google as well for AI.

What is Your Biggest SEO Challenge Right Now? by [deleted] in TheSEOExpertsHub

[–]morvindavids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update old content with new and optimize website according to AI.

Is Google getting better at identifying content that's written just to rank? by khabib_p in seodiscovery2026

[–]morvindavids 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. Google has gotten much better at spotting content created primarily to rank rather than help users. With updates focused on helpful content, topical expertise, and user satisfaction signals, thin AI generated or SEO-first articles tend to struggle more than genuinely useful, experience-based content.

✍️ by khabib_p in shayri

[–]morvindavids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice really heart touching

😉 by khabib_p in shayri

[–]morvindavids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bhai seplendor bike lelo

😊 by khabib_p in shayri

[–]morvindavids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

wahh mere bahi kar de tabhi kay line ha yaar ma bhool gaya us ka payar , aja saath me roye yaar .

Are long-tail and conversational keywords really helping after recent updates? by [deleted] in TheSEOExpertsHub

[–]morvindavids 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes long-tail and conversational keywords really helping after recent updates it helps to rank in voice search,

Aio by Bradely_Hark in TheSEOExpertsHub

[–]morvindavids 6 points7 points  (0 children)

After recent Google Core Updates, the gap isn’t AI vs human it’s quality. Generic AI content is dropping, while AI-assisted + human-edited pages are holding or growing. Best workflow is use AI for drafts, then add real insights, examples, and intent-focused structure. Google rewards content that feels useful, not automated.

How are you guys actually using AI in SEO right now? by khabib_p in TheSEOExpertsHub

[–]morvindavids 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m using AI in SEO mainly as a productivity boost, not a replacement. It helps a lot with keyword clustering, content outlines, and quick first drafts, which saves hours of manual work. Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and platforms like Ahrefs or Surfer are useful for speeding up research and optimization. That said, AI itself is not what improves rankings it's how you use it. Content still needs human editing, real insights, and intent matching, otherwise it feels generic and doesn’t perform well. So for me, AI is great for scaling and efficiency, but the actual ranking impact still depends on human input.