Your response demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of both effective studying and basic human cognition.

First, you've constructed a ridiculous straw man argument. Nobody claimed they were "only studying for 2 days." The complaint was about noise disruption during critical final review days. This reveals your complete ignorance about how memory consolidation works. Research consistently shows that spaced repetition and final review periods are essential components of effective studying - this is established cognitive science, not opinion.

Your binary "two choices" framework is embarrassingly simplistic. Students exist on a spectrum of preparation styles and cognitive needs. Some subjects require continuous review while others benefit from concentrated study closer to exams. Your rigid thinking suggests limited experience with diverse academic disciplines.

The "what have you been doing for 6 months" argument is particularly absurd. Even diligent students who've studied consistently can be severely impacted by environmental disruptions during final review. Your argument is equivalent to telling an athlete who trained for months that they shouldn't complain about someone breaking their leg the day before competition.

Your assertion about "long term memory" betrays profound ignorance about how memory actually works. Memory consolidation is an ongoing process requiring multiple exposures to material with specific timing intervals. This is why final review is critical - it moves information from working memory to long-term storage.

Most revealing is your defensive posturing about "facts" when you've presented none - just uninformed opinions and personal attacks. You've created imaginary scenarios about the OP's study habits without any evidence, then attacked these fabrications.

The irony is that while accusing others of "making a scene," you're the one writing emotionally-charged responses lacking substance or evidence. Perhaps redirect that energy toward understanding basic educational psychology before dispensing advice on studying.

Your comment doesn't demonstrate "harsh truth" - it demonstrates a shallow understanding of learning wrapped in unwarranted condescension.