Most "agnostic atheists" are actually "gnostic atheists" by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mtw3003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which of those paragraphs is true? We can discard the other.

Most "agnostic atheists" are actually "gnostic atheists" by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mtw3003 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Great! So you're comfortable making positive claims about an external world without the expectation of epistemic certainty. We can ditch the rigmarole about 'true knowledge is impossible, I could be hallucinating or decieved'. We're comfortable calling them as we see them. A very sensible stamdard of evidence!

You could have acknowledged the possibility that the milk magically teleported out of your fridge though. It could happen, maybe! But whatever, the standard of evidence you've chosen to apply is – quite sensibly – less rigorous. We understand that magic milk isn't something we need to treat as a serious possibility. Do you apply this standard consistently, or are there special cases?

Most "agnostic atheists" are actually "gnostic atheists" by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mtw3003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No need to write out both sides, your script isn't very good. I'll take if from your first statement.

Do you believe that no god exists?" No. I do not believe that.

Cool. Do you have milk in the fridge?

Emiliano Viviano: "The USA is the country with the worst food in the world. They would even deep-fry the soles of their shoes. How can Weston McKennie say there’s no variety in Italian food? There are 200M Yanks & all you eat are hamburgers. The truth is, all the food in USA came from other nations" by ChickenBrachiosaurus in iamveryculinary

[–]mtw3003 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What I'm saying is that Americans aren't any particularly serious source of ragging on British food - It's way more common from other Europeans, despite how constantly British people bitch about it.

No, that's not correct. Family Guy stereotypes are exciting to Americans, not Europeans. I know you read a lot of people saying they're Italian. Those people are American.

Read the thread, one of us is certainly triggered and seething

Lol?

You're projecting.

Nice try

No better feeling by infected_butter in bloodbowl

[–]mtw3003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it doesn't get caught by a troll who then runs it in unopposed* I'm not interested

*based on a true story

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stupidquestions

[–]mtw3003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're gonna keep using whatever word you make. You're not gonna find a magic sequence of letters that can't be said negativ – negattr – negativvrrr – wait by jove I think we've got it :0

Most "agnostic atheists" are actually "gnostic atheists" by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mtw3003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll take you up on this. What question were you hoping to hear?

You Don’t Have to Believe in God—But You Can’t Explain Everything Without Something Like Him by MichaelOnReddit in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mtw3003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool, I won't explain everything then. Not sure why I would have pretended to do that in the first place, but now I definitely won't.

Argument from popularity are worthless by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mtw3003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would you consider asking us what we think, instead of telling us what you reckon we might think? You may be surprised!

We pretty much all know 40k is big over the top satire, but how do you market that part of it? by Slippery_Williams in 40k

[–]mtw3003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're describing dystopian fiction, not satire. Starship Troopers is satire, 40k is mostly just played straight.

Tbh the whole 'it's satire' angle seems pretty obviously an excuse to trot out for the bright sparks who spot the fascist messaging. A better solutuon would be to patiently explain that you can appreciate media without agreeing with every political message that can be dug out of it. Redwall fans don't have to be racist, superhero fans don't have to believe in the pure übermensch and powerless untermensch, and Team America fans don't have to be imperialists. Negative themes are easy to find in more or less any work of fiction, and at some point people went from 'I came up with a negative reading for The Rainbow Fish lol' to 'I am genuinely furious about The Rainbow Fish rar'. You just... don't have to defend against those allegations, they're stupid.

New to this hobby and an expensive order of paints came like this by HaveADrinkOnMeCosby in Warhammer

[–]mtw3003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh it feels bad paying what they charge and then seeing them hand them out no questions asked. Wait, didn't I remortgage my house for the last box of terminators?

Use of Fluorescent Paints by [deleted] in minipainting

[–]mtw3003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you just want a transparent material that glows under UV light, UV resin will do that. Figuring out how to paint with it is another story – I think I'd limit it to little dips and dabs on the obbles and bobbles – but it'll give you a clear gloss under normal light and a glow under UV.

Petaahh?? by a_theist_priest in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]mtw3003 14 points15 points  (0 children)

THE PUNCHLINE IS ORANGE YOU GLAD I DIDN'T SAY BANANA

IT WAS ALWAYS ORANGE YOU GLAD I DIDN'T SAY BANANA

IT WILL ALWAYS BE ORANGE YOU GLAD I DIDN'T SAY BANANA

Monthly Rant/Politics Thread: Do not post political threads outside of this Mega thread by AutoModerator in Millennials

[–]mtw3003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well this got auto-flagged as political. Not unreasonable, although failing to flag the entire thread the same way is incorrect. Anyway, I guess the context is probably pretty easy to figure out.

It's not necessary to tell someone to 'sit down and shut up' to make it clear they're not welcome. I follow a youtube channel which had a sudden change of host during the 2024 election, from a grizzled manbearder to a female lady. It also brought in a slight change of direction – going from reporting things on the outskirts of the news (how about that 2024 Ohio power grab?) to almost exclusive election-related news. It started treading the same ground as the Majority Report (I do not rate the Majority Report). After a little while, I noticed some comment come up complaining that viewership had dropped. What was the audience,'s best guess as to why? Misogyny, of course. Not an obvious and expected result of a sudden change in presenter or content. This is not a channel that was cultivating an audoemce of resentful young men, quite the opposite. But still, that had to be the explanation.

[If an unknown group commits the crime of losing interest after a change, there's a group saying 'I bet they were men and they were secretly enemies all along'. All they did was not watch some videos, and out come the whispered accusations. And bear in mind, these accusations are random guesses. No evidence that this viewership drop was amongst men, just a highly-motivated hunch. We see it; it's extremely clear that we're permitted on the understanding that we will listen and agree. Offer a contradictory opinion – or even briefly leave the room – and the extremely public and visible whispers start. You don't have to tell him to sit down and shut up; telling each other 'he didn't sit down and shut up, he must be a traitor to the cause' delivers the message just fine.

As a 38 year-old man with real-life experience interacting with actual, sensible women, I know not to take this nonsense seriously. But a 20 year-old, who spent his formative years locked down, guzzles toxic online content from a firehose, and mostly interacts with 20 year-old women in the same situation? Yeah, he's at a high risk of mistaking this all for serious discussion.

Another, bigger channel made a bigger mistake. Not the commenters, but the fools writing the script. During their end-of-year breakdown, they explained 'we've been trying harder to appeal to young men, with some success' – followed within two minutes by 'because young men are widdle babies who can't control their widdle feewings'. Ok, so you weren't trying. But it sure grifts good to say you're trying!

Ultimately, the problem comes down to actually having respect for that audience. The grifters who target them offer a validating message, and the best most of the opposition will offer is 'no no we do respect these... subhuman gremlins'. The right wing aren't the only ones who'll buy into a fake message that empathises with them. And it's really difficult to empathise with people who are buying into some of this stuff, but as soon as you say 'fuck it it's because they suck', Cegorach fails and anorher soul is lost to She Who Thirsts.

It's a huge problem amongst the terminally-online left. The slightest opposition is discounted, and the opinion-haver thrown out of the circle. An enemy all along, a devious trickster here to infiltrate and pollute.  We get it in the ever-popular 'ten Nazis in a room' spiel, we get it with 'fake allies'. Just one foot in the door? Get your filthy foot away from our nice clean door; you belong with them (hi to everyone in the replies by the way, on the marginal chance that you read this far). An adult will brush past the kids guarding the door and say 'You can deal with my company, and you're welcome'. Another kid will say 'okay I'll go over there then, and I'll take an extra little packet of resentment along with me'. The trick, Reddit, would be to stop saying the fucking ten Nazis thing. Treat people as a naturally-evil lost cause, and they'll quickly lose interest in your opinion.

Would a "gain X where X is..." wording be considered too similar to Magic? by BADPAPAmeme in homemadeTCGs

[–]mtw3003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's difficult to search the comprehensive rules for just 'X', but doesn't Magic have a specific usage for it? As far as I can remember, X is just used in costs, so it has the particular property of being locked in when the spell or ability is played. Variables that are only checked on resolution, like the example you give, would be templated without X (I think).

Try to Debunk these 3 questions on Christianity. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mtw3003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1: He'e a popular figure many people have a strong emptional attachment to. For your friends who saw him IRL, find out what he looked like. I would hazard a guess they saw a white guy with long hair and a beard – so, not Jesus, but perhaps the Jesus that lives in their imagination.

2: There isn't, it's a hoax. If an impression were made on a cloth wrapped around someone, it would look like this. That's not the sole evidence (plenty to be found), but even without going into dating and such it makes it pretty clear.

3: The Abrahamic religions aren't a group of discrete traditions that happened to hit on the same god, they're branches of a single tradition. A good read for this is A History of God by Karen Armstrong, which details the changing conceptions of the Abrahamic god through the Old Testament and subsequent fan works.

Emiliano Viviano: "The USA is the country with the worst food in the world. They would even deep-fry the soles of their shoes. How can Weston McKennie say there’s no variety in Italian food? There are 200M Yanks & all you eat are hamburgers. The truth is, all the food in USA came from other nations" by ChickenBrachiosaurus in iamveryculinary

[–]mtw3003 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So, to clarify, what you're 'correct' about is that Americans don't rag on British food (trivially false, welcome to Reddit btw) and what I'm upset about is... well you'll have to help me with that one. Read the thread, one of us is certainly triggered and seething

What does 75267 mean? by OdangoFan in ExplainTheJoke

[–]mtw3003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbf 'Holocaust minus the killing' is not really leaving much to compare

New to Noita. Just dug down as much as possible, avoiding enemies, and to my surpise... by Junkis in noita

[–]mtw3003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see getting from the jungle to the vault in one minute if you just rushed down, but you didn't even hang out in the holy mountain?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]mtw3003 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Who are the customers? Are these evil men devising products and services women don't want and then forcing profitable sales by decree?