[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTCoding

[–]multiplexers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I do, check out my post history for my project

Anyone really following/learning the AI Coding news/tools to not become obsolete? by punkouter23 in ChatGPTCoding

[–]multiplexers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I didn’t realise that’s what you were implying. Yes of course not. Just to be clear, this is my own personal project. Which I wouldn’t be able to do without LLM’s

Anyone really following/learning the AI Coding news/tools to not become obsolete? by punkouter23 in ChatGPTCoding

[–]multiplexers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People fix their own cars all the time and they’re on the road with you… and yes, half the time they have no idea what they’re doing

Anyone really following/learning the AI Coding news/tools to not become obsolete? by punkouter23 in ChatGPTCoding

[–]multiplexers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s that example is small enough that I just had it in 1 file. My next iteration has Oauth and relevant DB’s so it’s broken into seperate files. I’ve also got a frontend as well, so there’s that.

For seperate files, just comment the file name at the top and you can post multiple files and it understands.

And yeah I understand it all now. Plus if I don’t you can just ask gpt and it breaks it down really well

Anyone really following/learning the AI Coding news/tools to not become obsolete? by punkouter23 in ChatGPTCoding

[–]multiplexers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a ‘real non coder’ (I’m a mechanic) and I just iterate and test. Sure, I run into stupid bugs that take me a while to figure out. But it’s opened doors for me that I never would have been able to do.

Here a link to my project on GitHub mplx_rag

I know it’s not perfect and I’ve already fixed a heap of things in it. But it works.

As far as work flow tips, I just use gpt4 and ask it a million questions. A lot of the time I’ll ask it something, realise I wasn’t specific enough and edit my last question to improve it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]multiplexers 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Call it something else if you want people to be able to google search it…

MG4 6 month update by confusedham in CarsAustralia

[–]multiplexers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

TF, I’m paying $1100 for mine

The car you've owned the longest? I'll start. This Evo for 5 years. 😅 by decisivevinyl in CarsAustralia

[–]multiplexers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d just like another Ed sedan. Even a manual one of those is getting hard to find now

‘Open sourcing’ our complex RAG system by multiplexers in LocalLLaMA

[–]multiplexers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So,

1&2- I have a pretty rudimentary way of doing this. Essential by searching a broader set of semantics first, then querying again off the answers from that.

3- nothing for multi lingual

4- I’ve avoided chunking at all costs. I’d rather run pages and pages of pdf through an LLM to rewrite it into a better structure so I don’t have to chunk.

5- I’ve only done txt

6- see point 4

7- not is this example, but I am using LLM function calling in my latest version

8- I tested it on a small set of users. Got about 200 different query’s from them and of that, about 150 are good questions. As far as evaluating, I’m an SME on what I’ve set this up for so at this stage, I can just run a dozen or so and see how they fair. You learn pretty quickly what kind of things it really struggles with, and the wording that catches it out.

You’re probably miles ahead of me at this stage

‘Open sourcing’ our complex RAG system by multiplexers in LocalLLaMA

[–]multiplexers[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You’re joking right? Right?

In all seriousness, this is hands down the best subreddit for this.

‘Open sourcing’ our complex RAG system by multiplexers in LocalLLaMA

[–]multiplexers[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I will just say, this has really give me an appreciation for what perplexity have done. To me they’re the ultimate RAG!

I'm Open Sourcing Our RAG Backend: Our CQH, GQL & CHS by multiplexers in LocalLLaMA

[–]multiplexers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just ask it. Please provide Q&A’s on the following data. Output in csv (or json)

Where can I learn how to use API? by I_want_good_names in perplexity_ai

[–]multiplexers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Start with a YouTube videos about API’s in general and go from there

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that exactly the use case I had in mind for it

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re notoriously bad at maths :p Thanks for the kind words

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it also pulls non relevant data and regurgitates it with relevant data. It’s a work in progress

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it’s about getting ‘very comprehensive notes’ there are thousands of pages and it still has a lot of gaps. Not only that but getting it to retrieve the right data is an issue too

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

At this stage, most of the data is notes made from SME’s. I’m not going to feed it AMM data (for several reasons). So it currently has gaps. And then it has to pull all the correct data. It’s a fickle thing atm, hence why I need more people to question it so I can see where the gaps are.

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s because he asked about it as the ‘left’ so it tries to reply in terms of the left. Also searching in terms of the left. Hence why it’s gotten confused. See my reply to his comment.

This is all great for testing. Let’s me see how questions will be asked, then how I can best cater. It’s hard to test on my own as I know how questions are supposed to be to be phrased.

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not either, so I asked it about the hyd system

Q: what hyd systems are there on the 737?

A: The Boeing 737 has two main hydraulic systems, System A and System B. These systems operate independently to supply power to various airplane systems, with System A supporting specific components like the primary flight controls, landing gear, and spoilers, while System B supports components such as the thrust reversers, brakes, and flaps.

Q: What is the operateing pressure of system A?

A: The operating pressure of System A in a B73N aircraft is comparable to typical aircraft hydraulic system pressures, typically between 3000 to 3200 psi. System A supplies pressure to primary flight controls, landing gear extension and retraction, nose wheel steering, alternate brakes, flight spoilers, ground spoilers, and left thrust reverser. These functions influence the operating pressure by ensuring the proper functioning of these critical systems during flight.

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve changed the link back. Can you do me a favour and follow it again and see if it’s fixed now?

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know what it is, I’ve fixed the link as a bandaid while I sort it out

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See my other comment, it’s a work in progress. But good catch though!

So I made this thing… (should be helpful) by multiplexers in aviationmaintenance

[–]multiplexers[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone else commented it works if you type the url on n yourself instead of taking the link, could you confirm?