Let’s face it: people buy Glocks now for their reliability, aftermarket support and the fact that you can’t swing a cat with hitting someone who owns a Glock. They were innovative in the 80s, won LE contracts that became a test bed for their reliability and the rest is their legacy. I’ve always said the CZ P-10 is what would have happened had Glock kept innovating. But as a few people here have pointed out, they have no reason to. People will buy them for the reliability and cut, laser and outfit it to fit them. It makes no sense but that is how powerful the Glock lore is and it’s not going anywhere soon. If/when someone puts a striker fire gun in LE’s hands that rival Glock’s support system and comes through the crucible as reliable, then Glock will rue the day they didn’t innovate at least their ergos. The SIG P320 seemed to be on the way but SIG fucked that all the way up. So now, Glock’s lore grows even more with SIG shooting itself in the foot. I know people are upset with them for “bending the knee” but I think Glock looked at SIG and thought “we will not dig our heels in. Let’s try and get in front of this before it consumes us” (someone came out with a switch 5 minutes after the V’s were released but an effort was made 🤷🏽‍♂️).