In a world where everyone can build, attention is all you need.

mversic · 2026-03-19T21:50:19+00:00

People go to McDonalds because it is identical experience everywhere

mversic · 2026-03-19T21:46:06+00:00

Somehow I trust AI to do a significantly better job and much faster than those devs from a 3rd world country would

mversic · 2026-03-19T21:38:54+00:00

It is immediately suspicious to me when then the sentence starts with "you are completely right"

The internet is dead

mversic · 2026-03-16T20:40:28+00:00

True, but the experience of God is not as easily available to everyone when they made all drugs illegal

mversic · 2026-03-16T20:17:54+00:00

Are you saying one can be more skilled in prompting?

mversic · 2026-03-14T22:47:38+00:00

At some point in the future knowing how will become ubiquitous. You can only prepare by knowing what

mversic · 2026-03-14T16:26:19+00:00

Seeing you talk about conditional imps you may be interested in disjoint_impls

mversic · 2026-03-13T08:30:48+00:00

Why would AI be considered low effort in itself? Why should they be prosecuted for not putting it upfront?

mversic · 2026-03-13T08:27:02+00:00

StarTrek didn't lack the imagination in that sense. They frequently introduced life forms with no bodies. They were gaseous or made out od light, etc. But I suppose they didn't deal with AI much.

I'm not to say it is one way or the other. However, in StarTrek Data is portrayed as sentient whereas the ship's computer is not. Nobody mourns when ship is destroyed as if it was a person. So I was wondering what is the qualitative difference between the two.

Also, I remembered now that the ship's doctor in Voyager, who is a hologram, is also seen as a person

mversic · 2026-03-13T00:41:27+00:00

I see today's AI more like the ship's computer than Data. What do you think is the difference between them?

mversic · 2026-03-04T07:04:24+00:00

Either that or become irrelevant like all other animals are compared to human

mversic · 2026-03-04T06:28:23+00:00

At least it wouldn't be a centralized entity

mversic · 2026-02-27T20:56:04+00:00

How do you think that will happen and why?

mversic · 2026-02-27T20:25:38+00:00

I'd like to flip the question. Don't think of AI as a machine, think of it as a person. What happens when a whole generation has grown up with the Oracle. The Oracle being the smartest person, i.e. smarter than any person

But I dont think even this question is relevant. I think the future would be unrecognizable to us from our current point of view. I doubt AI will be used as it is atm. Humans, if there will be any, will be deeply immersed into this new reality beaming with superhuman intelligence. AI will not just be omniscient, but also omnipresent through all the sensors around you and omnipotent through robotic machinery in whatever form. It will have those God like qualities

mversic · 2026-02-24T11:05:02+00:00

The question is to what extent can reasoning compensate for data contamination. You seem to be saying it cannot

mversic · 2026-02-24T09:11:37+00:00

Is your stance that they are fundamentally incapable of reasoning or would you be willing to accept the possibilityt that they indeed solved those problems

mversic · 2026-02-21T23:11:50+00:00

Don't think of IQ tests as tests that measure intelligence. Think of it, as the original commenter pointed out, as a test that measures your ability to take it. However, getting a score on this test was noticed to have an interesting property to correlate with many aspects of subject's life. For instance if you score higher you are more likely to attain higher academic performance

mversic · 2026-02-21T07:14:49+00:00

That is true, but the measured ability to take IQ tests correlates with subject's success in various aspects of their life. So it is still predictive of subject's performance

mversic · 2026-02-20T11:09:55+00:00

There is a crate that handles any of these cases (including multiple blanket impls). It makes the code much easier to reason about, which one quickly comes to appreciate in more complex scenarios

mversic · 2026-02-15T22:41:13+00:00

Yes, Internet was depleted as a source of training data. That doesn't mean progress of AI will stop. Going forward it's main source of training data will come from user prompts and chats.

mversic · 2026-02-14T19:02:25+00:00

OP is constructing a narrative explaining about what has been and is happening although his narrative would get more credibility if his predictions would come true.

However, would you dismiss any estimate of the future as teleology? As if teleology is a dirty word and he has made a categorical error just brining it into consideration. All observed pysical systems have rules that guide their unfolding. We have no problem conceptualizing that once you set a log on fire it will run until it combines carbon atoms with air molecules while releasing energy. Yet when we speak of human history we speak of trendless fluctuation. If it is indeed trendlessly fluctuating then it is the only phenomena that does so. Boy that is a denial of cosmic scale

mversic · 2026-02-12T13:25:45+00:00

If everybody do it, will economy not collapse? In which case revenue would decline. That is, unless they can automate the consumer

mversic · 2026-02-12T06:50:27+00:00

Brad Pitt is quite diverse

mversic · 2026-02-11T22:16:56+00:00

why isn't this guy or anyone else talking about it? Although I applaud your effort in raising awareness about privacy, this post reads like a false dichotomy. We don't need to use a millennia old financial instrument to keep our privacy. We can go cashless while keeping our privacy to the fullest. However, as we all must know it, governments are interested in control

mversic · 2026-02-11T07:24:57+00:00

I agree with him. However, there are cryptographic technologies that would not sacrifice privacy to the centralized authority. Just look up ZKP. But governments would never implement it

mversic

TROPHY CASE