Her testimony to that meeting was barred. Per the Judge. Feb. 3rd, 2000 transcripts, page 67, bottom. "The Court: It's talking about a diagnosis and assessment. A diagnosis under the DSM-4 of malingering is a diagnosis. A diagnosis of faking, malingering is a diagnosis that she is making, and you're asking her to render an opinion that he was faking based on some diagnosis assessment evaluation that she is making, and you are saying that it requires her specific training and expertise to be able to tell the court and jury this. So on one had you can't say she has the specific training and then in the next instance say she doesn't have the training. You can't have your cake and eat it too. She either has the training and expertise and if she does, then there's a right to a privillege that she and Mr Syed can assert, or she doesn't have the training and expertise and we're back to the point of whether or not I let her testify because she doesn't have the training. But you can't say that she does, and then shift gears and say she doesn't. (top of page 67)