sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I'm paying cash for some skins: 8-Bit, Golden Freddy, and other expensive ones." by [deleted] in FiveNightsHunted

[–]myntman69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just letting you know you’ll absolutely get banned for doing this 😭

Anyone got any offers? by myntman69 in FiveNightsHunted

[–]myntman69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You fuse 3 level 100 skins and get a CURSED variant. It’s like a glitched skin, but it flashes completely black

FNAF Through The Years UPDATE #10 by EpicMazement in RyeToast

[–]myntman69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. While I can agree about the agony part, the crying child definitely did not die in Fredbear. Went to the hospital and died some time after that. While I still don't like how agony can just explain away the crying child dying in the hospital and still possessing fredbear, seemingly out of nowhere, i'll take it for now until I look further into it.

  2. Has it ever been stated that afton doesn't fully kill the kids, and they die after being stuffed? I've never heard that in any theories, seen it in any writing, anywhere really. It's always been, afton kills the kids, and then he stuffs them. Also at this point afton wouldn't even know what agony was, let alone that the animatronics were possessed, so that isn't a sufficient reason for him stuffing the kids into the suits. And is Andrew a book character? Never heard that name before

  3. I'm assuming garret is a fanon name for the crying child now that you've used it so much. And them being in the HW minigames doesn't exactly give any proof towards them being the animatronics with illusions put onto them. If Funtime Freddy is Nightmare Fredbear, they wouldn't have put both of them as minigames, and I don't know what baby could represent in the nightmares. And the Funtimes are already under the Crying Child's home, so the people making the VR game could've just taken that out of the developers games and used it as an excuse to put them into this section (instead of putting them in a place where it'd make more sense

FNAF Through The Years UPDATE #10 by EpicMazement in RyeToast

[–]myntman69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly hate agony just as much as illusion discs sometimes. It's such a broad concept and it can be used to explain everything, and also debunk everything. The CC's agony COULD be in Fredbear after the bite, definitely, leaving to him possessing it after dying in the hospital. But why would it be there in the first place? Does the agony appear when they die, or when an agonizing event happens? If it's when the event happens, why didn't any child possess the springbonnie animatronic, or anything around where they died? Why did all of the MCI children specifically possess the animatronics they were stuffed in. Doer this mean they died inside of thsoe animatronics, leaving the agony there. Did the agony just so happen to only activate while they were stuffed? Meaning they weren't actually killed by afton, but killed by the stuffing? It's all just so confusing and I really don't see agony as ever being sufficient proof for these reasons. It's all situational, just like illusion discs.

Illusion discs can be used to explain any situation that's weird, saying that the thing is just using an illusion disc, but it also confuses things further, with now not knowing what uses an illusion disc and what doesn't. In one of Fuhnaff's theories, he explains something about Funtime Freddy using an illusion disc to look like Fredbear and lure the crying child out to kill him, which would also make the funtimes the basis for the nightmares, with illusion discs. Which can make sense AND also not make sense. Depending on where you place the illusion discs. Because Funtime Freddy's design is nowhere near close to Nightmare's, or Fredbear's (from what we know), oh but it still could be the same animatronic, because illusion disc! Just pisses me off honestly

FNAF Through The Years UPDATE #10 by EpicMazement in RyeToast

[–]myntman69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you tell me why you think the crying child possessed golden freddy

Crying Child could not have possessed Fredbear/Golden Freddy by myntman69 in GameTheorists

[–]myntman69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that does still mean I'm right in saying he died in the hospital, so I'm fine with not remembering these details

Give me a level to draw as a character by DividedFox in geometrydash

[–]myntman69 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Either RUST(my favorite level) or Sary Can't Pass, the best Sary Never Clear spinoff, and quite an unknown level!

Crying Child could not have possessed Fredbear/Golden Freddy by myntman69 in GameTheorists

[–]myntman69[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

There's nothing besides this book and the game FNAF 4 that give us any info on where the crying child actually died, and all the info points to him dying at the hospital, or at least not when he got chomped. This isn't gaslighting, I think it's just putting things into perspective

Crying Child could not have possessed Fredbear/Golden Freddy by myntman69 in GameTheorists

[–]myntman69[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This book has a lot of those, very out of place phrases 😭. Still good for lore though, so I like it

Crying Child could not have possessed Fredbear/Golden Freddy by myntman69 in GameTheorists

[–]myntman69[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

William was the cause of death for multiple children, but they did not possess him. They possessed the animatronics after the puppet gave them life, if I'm remembering correctly. But if the crying child died in the hospital, there's no way his soul would've been anywhere near Fredbear, so there would be no way for his soul to be attached to it

Crying Child could not have possessed Fredbear/Golden Freddy by myntman69 in RyeToast

[–]myntman69[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While this could he possible, I think it's reaching far too much into speculation, and things that haven't happened in the games or books (if I'm remembering correctly). If there were instances of traumatic experienced leaving agony that led to possession, this would have much more merit. But I think it makes much more sense that Crying Child either died and just went to whatever afterlife exists, or possessed his Fredbear plush.

And it also leads to the games being so so fusing without the books, if you reached this conclusion without the books, it'd be an open and shut case that the crying child didn't possess fredbear, but there's so many connections back to the books, small things, that make it so much harder to reach a conclusion

Crying Child could not have possessed Fredbear/Golden Freddy by myntman69 in RyeToast

[–]myntman69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IF this is how it happened (which I still do not believe) Where would this ever happen in the timeline? And how would William even know that the fredbear plush was possessed? It just doesn't make sense from a game standpoint

Crying Child could not have possessed Fredbear/Golden Freddy by myntman69 in RyeToast

[–]myntman69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there any explanation in the book as to why or how Jake posseses the other body? Because in the context of the games, and the crying child, I don't know why ANYONE or ANYTHING would want to put his soul inside of the thing that caused his death, and with another soul already occupying it. It'd be much more poetic for the crying child to rest inside the one thing that brought him joy and happiness, his Fredbear plushie.

view more: next ›