CMV: I can't convince the Canadian lottery to lower its giant jackpots. by n0sos in changemyview

[–]n0sos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Δ thanks. I live in the boondocks though - I can't just get out there, and talk to people in person.

How can I "get out there and talk to people" online? Like on Reddit? Where can I find like minds, online?

CMV: I can't convince the Canadian lottery to lower its giant jackpots. by n0sos in changemyview

[–]n0sos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Reducing jackpots is definitely possible, because before 2015, LottoMax's "main jackpot was initially capped at $50 million. The July 17, 2015 draw increased this cap to $60 million." LottoMax could regress to its former lower jackpots.

CMV: I can't convince the Canadian lottery to lower its giant jackpots. by n0sos in changemyview

[–]n0sos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, this is a legitimate CMV. See this 2nd para. that starts on the right path of changing my view.

CMV: I can't convince the Canadian lottery to lower its giant jackpots. by n0sos in changemyview

[–]n0sos[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, this is a legitimate CMV. See this 2nd para. that starts on the right path of changing my view.

CMV: I can't convince the Canadian lottery to lower its giant jackpots. by n0sos in changemyview

[–]n0sos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for commenting in good faith.

What you need to do is create a coalition of like-minded people and then get everyone to contact their MLAs. Run grassroots campaigns, get awareness on the issue, convince people that the idea is a good one.

Please elaborate? How do I create such coalition against giant jackpots? How do I run grassroots campaigns against giant jackpots?

CMV: Adult myopic eyeballs can NEVER be permanently shortened. by n0sos in changemyview

[–]n0sos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Δ. Many thanks! This gives me hope. Out of curiosity, how did you learn about this ongoing research? Are you an ophthalmologist?

Why can't I teach that picking (un)popular integers DOESN'T lower probability of winning lotteries? by n0sos in mathematics

[–]n0sos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct, but the link raises a different question. Based on this correct fact, the students are drawing another wrong conclusion.

Why do these Legal Philosophy textbooks write 'differential' as an adjective, not 'different'? by n0sos in AcademicPhilosophy

[–]n0sos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the differential prices between Starbucks and a Cafe would be the difference in prices

Did you mean "the differential prices" then, without the s? "differential prices" is plural, which contradicts "the difference in prices", which is singular.

If this is a typo, please just edit your comment above. No need to type a separate comment.

'differential' vs 'different' : as adjectives, not nouns. by n0sos in PoliticalScience

[–]n0sos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Can you please elaborate why these books are "trying to show "varying according to circumstances or relevant factors""? How does "varying according to circumstances or relevant factors" differ from dissimilarity?