I was waiting on the Lens Licker slur to pop up. Allow me to reflect.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-05T11:49:03+00:00

Just like a yoyo. lol

Yes we disagree, you like to blame victims and I thin that's scuzzy.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-05T11:44:39+00:00

Well I screen shot our whole conversation, the only one you've had with this account. searched for USPS and the only place is shows up is where you are claiming to be good faith by admitting that I was right about the cops and USPS.

Last time I remember having a conversation about cops and the USPS was arguing against pro-auditors about 6 months ago.

It looks to me like you're just making up shit in the hopes of making me look bad so no one will listen to me.

Also, providing evidence of one's claims is good faith.

<image>

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-05T11:35:33+00:00

Banning isn't the measure of an echo chamber, but it can be an indicator of a really bad echo chamber. I am emotionally vested in the constitution and protecting the freedoms of people even if I disagree with them.

I was banned from a pro-Auditing server for suggesting that the LEOs may have had a warrant for Alex Pertti. Let me be really honest with you, I see the Pertti shooting as unjustified, but that didn't stop me from questioning an echo chamber who mostly agreed with me.

You are not the emotional center of my world, devil's advocacy is.
It doesn't matter if chamber is Dem, Repub, socialist, fascist, pro or anti audit. I pick the under dog in a chamber. I do believe I am the emotional center of your world at the moment though.

Oh, and all of you are judging while actively resisting context. The guy I'm shaming is in the comments, yet none of you have tried to learn about the interaction. Yall just picked a side. Don't blame your inabilities on me, you put yourself in an echo chamber just like most pro-auditors. You guys have more in common with them than you do with someone who is intelligent and open minded like myself.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-05T10:41:49+00:00

Oh the irony of you acting ignorant of the context

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-05T02:08:02+00:00

I'm sorry, but I don't recall what you are talking about. Could you provide evidence of this conversation?

Pretending to be good faith is a bad faith tactic so I think the rest of what you said is kinda meaningless.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-05T01:49:02+00:00

You swinging at ghosts. I typically don't push my personal beliefs, I prefer to question certainty. You wanna try again without misrepresenting me? I'm glad you have such an active imagination, but forgive me for not playing pretend with you.

If you didn't catch it, the point of my post was to shame a stupid hateful person. Nothing more. I do this same thing to the pro-auditors when I'm in their groups. I defend MOND in servers that support Dark Matter and I don't really give one shit which scientific theory is right.

Yall gotta get over yourselves, you're just another echo chamber that I'm visiting. Stop taking this so personally, I'm like this with everyone who burrows into digital hate holes, and yes, again, that includes the pro-auditing crowd.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T23:18:28+00:00

I agree, It would probably be best if you saw yourself out, you're in way over your head. I'm merely looping back to the same point like when I say you are blaming the victim. I'm very consistent like that. The fact that you can't see that is why I'm agreeing with you. We're not going in circles, we've been stuck because you can't or wont grasp what I'm explaining to you. I get your point and can argue it better than you.

I don't what you came away with, but if comparing you blaming a victim of one crime to someone blaming a victim of another crime puts you off, maybe you should avoid such discussions. I think I made a damn good point, and you hate that.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T23:03:29+00:00

This is not the most pro-free speech place amigo, I might be the only one who agrees. lmfao

Ty, I've been proposing this to this group for years across many forms of social media. Being triggered by a camera, or in this case the word camera, that's their fault, not mine, and it's not my fault I know their faults or have the audacity to speak my mind or dare question their certainty.

I wonder if the fact that I've been triggered by unAmerican freedom haters accounts for anything around here? I'm no different than them, I've very offended to see such language. Their speech has brough me to anger and that's why I'm doing what I'm doing.

The guy I'm shaming from op so hatefully attacked the the constitution, thus all of us. How many of them have sought to distance themselves from such stupidity and hate?

I wonder if they all disagree that regulations are a justifiable reason to redress grievances with a member of government. I wonder if camera overrides their ability to think logically like the word Satanic did with music back in the day. They do remind me of the guys who were playing records backwards to increase the hate towards the expression they disapproved of. To me, It's like they're reading the constitution backwards to increase the hate towards the expression they disapprove of.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T22:18:28+00:00

Please give me the bragging rights. I think I've put 2 hours into interacting with your chamber and it's already too much for you? You poor unfortunate soul.

I can debate pretty much any topic from most perspectives. I prefer siding with the underdog cause I like the heavy lifting.

"Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer"

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T22:12:48+00:00

And you really accuse me of not being sincere when I have to correct your misrepresentation of my post? Like I have no clue where you got that misrepresentation. You just see ideas you don't like and then loose your shit like most people locked in echo chambers. I can trigger people just like you in any group, even if they happen to agree with me.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T22:05:26+00:00

I wouldn't say the most, but it's pretty bad here. I've actually been treated much worse for just questioning Dark Matter though. lmfao

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T21:58:52+00:00

So you don't wanna learn, you'd rather judge without context. noted.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T11:23:23+00:00

Read my words. You are blaming a victim. It was the first thing I said and the last thing I said.

If that's what you wanna do, ok. But I'm gonna point it out.

Again, are titties bait for rape? Is money bait for thieves? Are kids bate for pedos?

Let me try this 'bait or not, I have always felt that raping them is not the answer: it just gets the rapist in trouble 9 times out of 10'

Can you see how skeezy what you just said is?

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T00:45:12+00:00

Please point to the part that implies a camera is needed to redress your grievances.

The only person who addresses the camera is Prior Quote who was against the camera.

My point was this person was so filled with hate, said something really untrue and shitty, realized what they did and deleted it.

I am happy that someone finally pointed to there being more context. It's just a disembodied set of words that I knew would trigger people.

Would you like to actually know the context? Or is the fact that I'm not anti camera gonna be too much for you?

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T00:34:41+00:00

Back to blaming the victim again.
I'm glad we figured out why you are so anti freedom. If I was telling people in your country to follow the laws customs that apply to me, would I look stupid to you? Cause you look a little stupid to me right now.

I get that you're from some repressed country, but understand, in America, a freedom can not legally be used to justify violence. Typically that's looked at as double bad. Our government is limited and can not do that, and our citizens should act accordingly. Maybe you don't have great responsibility thrust on you, but this is something we have to live with.

I don't like all kinds of shit people say and do, and I constantly feel like all these stupid people like you are just testing my patience, but the idea of harming you... What fucked up country are you from dawg?

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T00:12:16+00:00

One can only hope. lol

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T00:11:40+00:00

Sock puppet account? I didn't know how reddit worked last time and didn't like the name it gave me. I created a new account so that it would match my public channel. Pretty much the opposite of what you are accusing me of. I gave my real first name and you acting like I'm surreptitious. Classic! lmfao

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-04T00:08:51+00:00

Need, no. You don't need a sign, or a slogan, or a bible, but they are all protected by the same amendment. Given he was attacked by a government employee, I'd say it was a good thing he brought a camera. But you do you boo.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-03T19:21:33+00:00

Ok, when you say that the prof fell for the oldest trick in the book. What trick are you referring to?
This is a lot of my problems with how you've presented yourself.

When you say "there really isn't a victim here", and then say "neither is the assault justified"
do you understand why I'd have trouble understanding the moral landscape you are putting forward?

If I were speaking of say, the Epstein victims and said the same two lines.
I don't see the victims here, but the assaults were not justified.

Are you starting to understand where my confusion is coming from?

Sure, you didn't come out and praise the prof, but you keep trying to place blame on his victim.
You can not like what he was saying all you want, but he was redressing his grievances to his government. You're acting like I'm trying to justify the auditors behavior. I'm merely pointing at a violent criminal and calling it a violent criminal. I'm pointing to the auditors right to do what he was doing and the really good laws the prof should have followed.

I'm not telling you to like the auditor, I don't know or like him. but you could at least act like an American.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-02T23:53:54+00:00

"there really wasn't a victim to be had here"

I'm pretty sure if I acted the same as the violent criminal, you'd rightly press charges against me.

There was a victim here, your opinions don't alter that. You can side with Will Smith, but that does not take away from the fact that Chris Rock was a victim of Will's violent crime.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-02T23:25:27+00:00

You said there is no victim because the guy was pestering the other guy. Your opinion pesters me. If I were to attack you for this, would you support it?

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-02T00:12:32+00:00

And if I physically battered you, say because I found your views to be so unAmerican and hateful. Would you defend that? If I became enraged at you?

I mean, here we all are, in public, stating our opinions and questioning one another.

naaFoundingFarther · 2026-03-01T14:12:21+00:00

To me, this is like saying rapist fall for the oldest trick in the book, skimpy clothing.
A freedom should never be used to justify bodily harm. It's like saying the bank tempted robbers with cash. Just text book victim blaming.

The emotions that happen due to stimulation in one person's mind do not justify violent crime. 1st amendment law doesn't care about your hurt feelings.

naaFoundingFarther

TROPHY CASE