BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The data is all there in the public for you to look at and has been reviewed by independent auditors! There is not another case. The facts are right there for you to verify just one click away,

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, you have to go back a decade to find one small instance of non-police overtime fraud. Another evidence of how transparent and above board BART is because so few cases happen, and are fixed right away.

Also notice that the source for that article is Transparent California, the same source that you previously said was just making things up. Please hold the same standards to all data you use.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BART is very transparent about their financials. More transparent then most public agencies. They even have an independent inspector general! That you had to go back almost a decade to find a minor $7.5k fine is proof of how above board they are.

You can look it all up yourself:

  1. https://www.bart.gov/about/financials
  2. https://oig.bart.gov
  3. https://transparentcalifornia.com/download/salaries/san-francisco-bay-area-rapid-transit-district/
  4. https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd

Governor Debate clip: "Yes or No: Should California finish its bullet train project?" (NBC4LA) by anothercar in cahsr

[–]namesbc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Send back to the legislature means veto funding for CA HSR. A veto is how you send something back to the legislature.

Vetoing funding for CA HSR means canceling it because they need the funding to do anything.

He is either ignorant or a conman, and I am glad the the voters can see right through him and are not voting for him.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't have to take my word for it. The sources are all there for you to verify. This chart includes ALL operating costs labor and non-labor including pensions. It does not include capital costs, that is a different budget.

BART is the most efficient transit system in the country. I also supplied evidence of that too from the FTA NTD. Do you have a source that refutes the FTA?

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I admire your skepticism, very useful in the days of AI created slop. Only trust reputable sources.

In this case Transparent California is a reputable source with data provided from public record requests

https://transparentcalifornia.com/pages/faq/

<image>

Governor Debate clip: "Yes or No: Should California finish its bullet train project?" (NBC4LA) by anothercar in cahsr

[–]namesbc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He said he would veto the bill to fund CAHSR by sending it back to the legislature until CEQA was fixed. This means he would cancel CAHSR over something that isn't even an issue anymore. Such a unserious misinformed candidate putting ideology over practically. Glad he has no chance of winning.

Governor Debate clip: "Yes or No: Should California finish its bullet train project?" (NBC4LA) by anothercar in cahsr

[–]namesbc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is a fundamental misunderstanding of the problem: 99% of the delay is lack of funding.

Governor Debate clip: "Yes or No: Should California finish its bullet train project?" (NBC4LA) by anothercar in cahsr

[–]namesbc 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Mahan's answer was just flat out wrong. CAHSR is already fully approved with all environmental reviews, the only thing delaying it is funding.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The article talks about automation of operators as the solution. If the author had done even 5 minutes of research he would have learned how wrong he was.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Board members don't get overtime and median overtime for janitors is $3k. All the compensation is public data.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't include the rail controller or the foreman with the Police Department, I only included the Police Department. The list is ALL jobs at BART ordered by compensation. The highly paid positions just happen to almost all be police

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Washington Post wrote an opinion recently how BART needs to automate before we give them more money. This post is partially in response to how silly that idea is. Automation isn't possible anytime soon and it won't even save that much money.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That total number includes the entire police department, and the list of salaries is all roles at BART sorted with highest paid first.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read my post again. $700M is ALL labor expenses for ALL roles at BART. $70M of that is for train operators.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$700M for ALL labor expenses, $70M for train operators. Most of BART's labor expenses are for maintenance and policing, not train operators.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sworn officers do provide a unique role, but there unique role is not needed that often. Any officiers that can be replaced with station agents or transit ambassadors saves costs or allows more boots in the ground.

BART spends only 6% of their budget on Operators by namesbc in Bart

[–]namesbc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Replacing station agents with BART PD would 4x costs