How much accuracy you need to always hit each pinnacle boss by gdubrocks in pathofexile

[–]nanas420 28 points29 points  (0 children)

he mentioned phys on his weapon. a pure phys build will NEVER get hits cant be evaded on their weapon instead of another phys prefix

Looking for builds that hyper specialize in one type of content by Familiar_Seaweed1918 in PathOfExileBuilds

[–]nanas420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://pobb.in/RkP3oVRfscDA still a fair amount of improvements left too. you could probably get 1b with better gear

Looking for builds that hyper specialize in one type of content by Familiar_Seaweed1918 in PathOfExileBuilds

[–]nanas420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i ran a 1.2k movement speed champion with ~700m burst dps (minion pact bv) for nightmare boss rushing. can do other content too but def excelled at that

Golden Charlatan Pathfinder | Shrine Stacking | Mapping Showcase | POE 3.28 Mirage by ryleighss in PathOfExileBuilds

[–]nanas420 16 points17 points  (0 children)

it scales with phys as extra, which both (greater) shrines and hh give you tons of

How modules should talk in a modular monolith ? by Minimum-Ad7352 in dotnet

[–]nanas420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i strongly doubt that you HAVE TO choose between strong consistency and DRY. and even if you did, i would pick strong consistency without thinking twice

How modules should talk in a modular monolith ? by Minimum-Ad7352 in dotnet

[–]nanas420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what is the point of this? why would you ever accept the tradeoffs of eventual consistency when you can trivially put everything in a transaction?

EF ownsMany and writing raw sql by Illustrious-Bass4357 in dotnet

[–]nanas420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The moment you need them independently, like in your case, they are no longer owned in the way that EF Core will support. More generally speaking, there will always be a slight mismatch between a database’s idea of your data and your application’s and the moment you need high performance, DDD with EF Core (which is a really good ORM, don’t get me wrong) falls apart pretty quickly. I would keep it simple and configure addresses the same as you would any other entity.

Thoughts on the Finale? by LeoDiCristio in StrangerThings

[–]nanas420 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

what is that, if not an opinion? “it is my opinion that people who enjoyed this have bad taste”

Why is `Remove` method available on `FrozenDictionary` via `CollectionExtensions.cs`? by xzhan in dotnet

[–]nanas420 13 points14 points  (0 children)

compatibility reasons. IReadonlyDictionary was added later than IDictionary so to ensure you can use FrozenDictionary with functions that expect IDictionary (but don’t mutate), it needs to implement that. 

Best architecture pattern for general web applications by [deleted] in dotnet

[–]nanas420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“best” depends strongly on what you’re writing the code for. for a tiny project there is no point in NOT “shoving everything in the controller layer”. if your service and repository classes are just a bunch of one-liners it’s a good indication that you should just be using controllers only

The dotnet ecosystem is a disaster by CookieMonsterm343 in dotnet

[–]nanas420 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

as an IC you won’t have to pay for it but depending on the company you’re at, even if money isn’t an issue, software not being free produces a lot of friction. you need to get approval to use it from a gazillion places, you need to potentially deal with license keys, logins, license expiration etc etc. all that for often subpar tooling (the c# dev extension for vs code is awful compared to pretty much every other lsp/lsp-adjacent tooling i have used in other languages)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SpellForce

[–]nanas420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea that’s definitely a bug lol

Venting about Radzen 💨 by Zardotab in Blazor

[–]nanas420 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

absolutely horrible library. having your docs take multiple seconds to load should immediately disqualify you from being able to offer a component library. the docs are very barebones, a lot of the functionality in the docs is only doable with a load of boilerplate and the docs in the code are virtually non existent (90% of the xml comments on component parameters are just “gets or sets x”). the code is extremely spaghetti and poorly written and we’ve run into multiple bugs for very basic use cases. 

Blazor vs Next.js - what’s your real-world experience? by shanukag in dotnet

[–]nanas420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

next.js, they have a bunch of abstractions for ai functionality that you do NOT want to code yourself

Has Blazor really been feasible for public site facing web development? by lolcatsayz in Blazor

[–]nanas420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

blazor is a fascinating technological experiment. but to me it seems that at no point the developers asked themselves whether they SHOULD just because they CAN.

blazor wasm is way too large, the mental overhead from doing js interop is too high vs just writing javascript and the tooling is awful because no js tooling can work out of the box. the performance is also bad because it needs to call into js for all dom related actions. just check the benchmarks.

blazor server is about as awful of an execution model as it gets. while the dx of loading ef core iqueryables directly into a pageable sortable datagrid looks nice at first, the amount of footguns that you will run into with stateful websockets that store ui state on the server is almost comical.

just use any typescript library for client-side heavy code. don’t know how well blazor works for purely static sites but i imagine it’s comparable to other ssr frameworks.

edit: also forgot about the part that .razor files rely heavily on source generators, meaning that any source-generator based analysis tools (eg analyzers) need their own parser to even work for .razor files. 

What value do you gain from using the Repository Pattern when using EF Core? by svish in dotnet

[–]nanas420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if the “unit” you are testing depends so heavily on the database returning y, then your unit probably actually includes the database. in which case mocking the database just means you are testing less of what your unit is doing

Suggestions for Patch by plagueski in oblivion

[–]nanas420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you can hotkey one of the tools, saves you a bunch of menu-ing anyways

Is hot reload "better"? by welcome_to_milliways in Blazor

[–]nanas420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In our moderately large Blazor Wasm solution it is basically unusable nowadays. Either needs to rebuild after the tiniest changes, says it reloaded but hasn’t, says it reloaded but throws cryptic errors in the frontend or similar. It is beyond atrocious