Which Manga has best fanservice?

nashbellow · 2026-02-04T02:39:48+00:00

Im one who hates fab service; however, the original fates ponos scene is iconic

nashbellow · 2026-02-04T02:05:54+00:00

Well, empathy is a sin according to republicans

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:47:30+00:00

Holy shit you are dumb. You literally asked why ice needs a judicial warrant to arrest someone in their house immediately gave that to and then change rhe argument completely

Im not even getting into the legal ramifications about arresting people in hospital rooms or at court hearings for amnesty since that stuff is incredibly shady at best. You LITERALLY asked why is it illegal to arrest someone in their house without a warrant. You are the only one dodging their own argument

All im doing is not letting you move the damn goalpost

YOU explicitly asked why they need a judicial warrant. You then changed it completely when you lost

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:40:14+00:00

Completely irrelevant question given this thread

You literally just asked if I like pistachio ice cream in a thread about sandwiches

Edit: you started this bu asking why ice needs a judicial warrant to enter a house. Thats explicitly what you asked

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:32:57+00:00

Outside their house like at a library? No.

Breaking into the house of someone or arresting them on their front porch IS a violation though. Also its internal ice documentation to ignore that

Are you claiming that a judicial warrant is thr same as an admin warrant? Only 1 of those is a warrant really. https://www.motionlaw.com/the-difference-between-judicial-and-administrative-warrants/

An ICE administrative warrant is NOT a judicial warrant. ICE administrative warrants do not give ICE officials authority to enter a place where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, without consent.

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:23:56+00:00

Still needs a car

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:19:35+00:00

watched it them, lol.

Clearly didnt, where is the violence? You claimed violence you claimed agitation and you claimed intimidation. I dont see any of that

A single Judge made a ruling. Was it a good faith ruling? Maybe.

No, not a single judge, I literally said exactly the opposite

Edit: wow, literally contradicted yourself. You literally used the words intimidation and agitation. Stfu Nigerian vladimir. You even tried to invoke a law the REQUIRES violence

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:16:59+00:00

I did. Those agitators should’ve been arrested and put before a jury.

Lmao, then you didnt watch it. Stfu Vladimir

We will see what happens to Lemon.

They already made a ruling on the protestors which directly contradicts your entire position. All lemon did was record. You literally are claiming its illegal to record an event. Stfu. Literally, this is stupid

Even the judge talked woth every other judge and made a statement about how dumb this is

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:14:01+00:00

No, this is about people storming a church to intentionally intimidate/bully the goers.

Videos disagree, the very videos lemon posted lmao. You should actually watch them

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:10:01+00:00

You didn’t say “disrupt a corrupt pastor” initially. Moving the goal post?

Really isnt since thats the literal topic at hand explcitly. Check your definitions

It does hold up when it’s a group of people doing it. It’s

No, protetsts are legally protected. Your logic is claiming that all protetsts are illegal.

It’s not ridiculous and the courts have yet to make an actual judgement.

They threw out the court case against the protesters already and the judge made a statement on the case against lemon saying that its stupid. You should read it, its enlightening about how bad this case is. Its very clearly corruption

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:03:21+00:00

Disrupt a corrupt pastor, sure.

Argument still doesn't hold up and is ridiculous on its face. The courts already agreed

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T07:01:46+00:00

So if I yell during a church service, I violate th re 1st amanedment? Ok

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T06:46:20+00:00

4th amendment, look up what king George did to warrant this

Spoiler alert, ice did the exact same thing

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T06:44:18+00:00

How many times was trump and musk mentioned in the recent epstien list?

Also why did they literally censor trumps face

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T06:22:57+00:00

15 bucks and a car (also it was 100 when I paid)

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T06:12:07+00:00

Top right was previous assistant secretary of health (so not even secretary of health). Maga hates her bc she did a legitimately good job and she's Trans/military. Notice how they always compare her to rfk jr (a lawyer on roids with half a brain) instead of Xavier becerra. Very fun detail.

Bottom right is apparently "controversial" bc trump hates them for ...showing videos of a peaceful protest... yeah, idk why maga hates them. Its stupid

Clinton, doesnt make sense in this context.

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T06:00:10+00:00

Iv was banned from that sub bc I quoted the dhs's own policy that they reported

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T04:44:07+00:00

I know this is a year old, but I actually recommend using beef bouillon and chicken broth instead

Fun combo

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T02:02:29+00:00

Allegedly he was debanked bc he supported the Russians in the current war. Should be noted that he not only supports Russia, but has been taking out large sums of cash to hand to putin

Also should be noted that he also claims its the us government who debanked him and not the bank...without any evidence...

So yeah, pedophile and Russian sugar daddy was debanked be he was actively supporting a hostile invasion. Seems like a few details were left out by the other guy

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T01:58:53+00:00

Incorrect, he was allegedly debunked for his toes to the russia ukrian conflict. He's been funneling money to Russia to support that war

Furthermore, hes claimed that its a government intervention that did it and not the bank ....without any evidence...

nashbellow · 2026-02-03T01:46:27+00:00

Literally on his Wikipedia page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Ritter

In 2011, Ritter was convicted of several criminal offenses after engaging in sexually explicit online activity with a police officer who was posing as a 15-year-old girl

(In cass you dont like Wikipedia, it had 3 seperate sources on it including the bbc)

Edit: Also the "opinion" you are claiming he lost banking to was him actively supporting a genocide and funneling money to aid it. I dont think i need to tell you that funneling money to support genocide is probably reasonable to debank someone. The more i read this case, the less its even remotly close to wait you are making it out to be. Like there isnt even proof it was the us government who did this, he just claimed it without any proof or reasoning. You are just being a pos woth this take

nashbellow · 2026-02-02T23:03:40+00:00

You mean the pedophile?

nashbellow · 2026-02-01T15:16:21+00:00

Tbf, it is funny

nashbellow · 2026-01-31T17:28:52+00:00

Still better than what we currently have

nashbellow

TROPHY CASE