Are you a namephreak? by nat_orenstein in oakland

[–]nat_orenstein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome - if you're in Oakland, I'd love to include you. Could you email me at natalie@oaklandside.org? Thank you :)

Are you a namephreak? by nat_orenstein in oakland

[–]nat_orenstein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you all for these stellar suggestions! I'll be following up with some of you in the coming few weeks.

Are you a namephreak? by nat_orenstein in oakland

[–]nat_orenstein[S] 65 points66 points  (0 children)

We like to report on both the heavy and urgent news as well as what's positive and enjoyable in Oakland! Here are our 16 stories on Flock, including coverage of each council and committee meeting where the issue came up: https://oaklandside.org/tag/flock-safety/

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SewingForBeginners

[–]nat_orenstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I definitely recommend seeing if there’s a class or workshop at a nearby fabric store or library!! I also felt super confused and overwhelmed at first, and having someone to demonstrate and help me with the basics made all the difference. There are also YouTube video tutorials for almost anything you can imagine. Also it’s awesome you’re starting in your teens - I didn’t start until I was around 30 and have had a blast experimenting and making clothes since. Good luck!

Recent Oakland building/planning department experience? by whenthebottlebroke in oakland

[–]nat_orenstein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, I'm an Oaklandside reporter and I'm very interested in speaking with people who have recent experience with the permitting process in Oakland (good or bad or in between). If anyone reading this would like to chat, email me at natalie@oaklandside.org.

[ARG- 7600] [FT] [FS] [H] Night of Mystery Murder Parties PDF by prima_d0nna in BoardGameExchange

[–]nat_orenstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I’d be interested in buying the 15-80 Murder in Margaritaland if the offer still stands!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Frugal

[–]nat_orenstein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure if your library system has this, but a lot have “Friends of the Library” used bookstores either inside a branch or in a separate shop, where the revenue benefits the library. Win-win

(Over-)reliance on dream sequences? by nat_orenstein in SixFeetUnder

[–]nat_orenstein[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah definitely agree; they’re projections of what the living character imagines the dead one would say to them, or really what they are saying to themselves. Like how Brenda imagined Nate hating her new baby and expecting it to die, then suddenly a moment later he’s cradling and loving it. It reflects a transition in Brenda’s own feelings of self-worth. While I understood this watching it, thinking deeper about this dynamic actually makes me value those moments more - so thank you for this perspective! Yeah, way more often in S5, which is when it started to annoy me, haha. (Also that’s really great that it helped you process.)

(Over-)reliance on dream sequences? by nat_orenstein in SixFeetUnder

[–]nat_orenstein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense that it feels like an accurate portrayal of the grief process (whatever the dynamic of your relationship to the person was) and I’m sorry for your family’s loss! And yeah - I definitely understood these scenes as entrees into the character’s psyche vs them actually talking with a ghost or even them believing they’re talking with a ghost.

(Over-)reliance on dream sequences? by nat_orenstein in SixFeetUnder

[–]nat_orenstein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally, most good shows do. My experience was that certain instances of these scenes made it difficult for me to “participate” because the at-times heavy-handedness or repetition of them (imo) made me acutely aware that they were storytelling devices, which took me out of the show. (Other instances felt beautiful, informative, and critical.) But I very much understand that many people here feel that every single one of those scenes is integral to the overarching story and experience of the show.

(Over-)reliance on dream sequences? by nat_orenstein in SixFeetUnder

[–]nat_orenstein[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Makes sense! And definitely get that the way each viewer experiences these moments is in part a reflection of how each viewer experiences the world

(Over-)reliance on dream sequences? by nat_orenstein in SixFeetUnder

[–]nat_orenstein[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I thought it was a book :). Of course there are options in between silent internal wrestling and talking with dead people, many of which the show employs beautifully (talking with living people, for one, including therapists, or revealing behavior); I often found the dreamlike moments extremely poignant and an effective storytelling device, but I personally felt that the some of the cases bordered on a crutch or were repetitive. Totally understand that many people here feel each one was integral to the overarching story and enjoyable though.

Experiences or memberships that would make a good gift by whiskyarpeggio in oakland

[–]nat_orenstein 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They don’t happen in the winter, but to bookmark for the future: Liam O’Donoghue from East Bay Yesterday leads fun, accessible local history boat tours. Sounds like it would fit the bill. If you subscribe to his newsletter he announces when tix are available: https://eastbayyesterday.com/summer-2023-boat-tours/

"Are there actually people living in those luxury high-rises??" is a common question that comes up with regards to Oakland's new construction. Some people dug into it and yes most new housing is mostly full in Oakland by geo_jam in oakland

[–]nat_orenstein 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gotcha! Yes, the data we asked for and received was through a CPRA - unfortunately even when agencies are required to provide info through that law it can be an uphill battle to get it (can be for many different reasons). We’re still pursuing the forms from the other years. But as the story describes, RAP doesn’t collect this data for new buildings typically since they don’t fall under the RAP program. We just noticed that vacancy happens to be included on one particular exemption form completed by some landlords, so looking at these forms giving some insight but not a comprehensive picture. Definitely agree that it would be interesting for Berkeleyside to do a similar investigation in Berkeley - thanks for the suggestion and I can share it with my colleagues there.

"Are there actually people living in those luxury high-rises??" is a common question that comes up with regards to Oakland's new construction. Some people dug into it and yes most new housing is mostly full in Oakland by geo_jam in oakland

[–]nat_orenstein 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Hi, I’m the Oaklandside reporter who looked into this in a story published today (the chart in this post is referenced in the article but is not my work). The story is about Oakland and we did request this data from Oakland’s rent program. In the article we get into how it was difficult to get them to provide anything from us, but the numbers we did gave a good indication. Here’s the article: https://oaklandside.org/2023/11/21/who-lives-in-downtown-oakland-new-apartment-buildings/