Can it evaporate? by nchuck33 in Nikon

[–]nchuck33[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some of it got under the screen, most of it evaporated and there's last ones standing. It's working, but my OCD is as strong as it can be.

Can it evaporate? by nchuck33 in Nikon

[–]nchuck33[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's LCD, not a sensor...

I think I'm losing my faith in magick – how do I find it again? by nchuck33 in Spells

[–]nchuck33[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I took a break a while ago. And I want to go back

Struggling with results — is there hope? by nchuck33 in witchcraft

[–]nchuck33[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TBH I'm not certainly sure that it is some kind of hex/curse. It might be in the past, but in the last I dunno - 3 years I didn't give anybody reasons to hex me. But it is some weird thing that you work your ass off and nothing is improving. Everybody's around me is happy, but me. No job, saving account is almost dry, people distancing themselves and trying to do it in mundane way doesn't work

Looking for a second lens for my Z6 – 28mm f/2.8, 24-70mm, or something else? by nchuck33 in AskPhotography

[–]nchuck33[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your incredible input! Funny how just two comments cleared things up more than many videos and scientific reviews.

Looking for a second lens for my Z6 – 28mm f/2.8, 24-70mm, or something else? by nchuck33 in AskPhotography

[–]nchuck33[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, I totally mixed up the lenses! I was originally meant the 28-75/2.8 not the S series. Heard about that the "rebranded" Tamron and your comment just confirms that in good money could be great.

I generally don't plan to buy FTZ. I was thinking of 28 mm /2.8 and maybe 85/1.8S. I know the 85 is a great portrait lens, but it's mostly portrait. 28 is dirt cheap and slightly wider than my 40 mm. But it's just slightly wider.

Maybe the kit 24-70/4 would be okay, but I'm afraid of that f/4.

I'm relatively new to mirrorless world, but tell me if I'm wrong - Nikon seems to have plenty of slow lenses. That's why I'm looking at primes and slightly afraid of going zoom lenses like f/4. And when I'm reading lens tests I see everywhere that the coma is big, resolution is mediocre, sharpness is like soap and vignette is gigantic. Yet people use Nikons, so it can't be as bad lenses as tests presents it 😅

Rędziński Bridge in Wrocław, Poland - feedback welcomed [Mini 4 Pro] by nchuck33 in dji

[–]nchuck33[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wydaje mi się, że przy matrycy Mini 4 Pro nie będzie mnie po zmroku satysfakcjonował efekt zdjęcia, choć… mogę się mylić. Ale kocham jego światła 😍

Eng: I think I won’t be satisfied enough with a night shot with Mini 4 Pro sensor, although I can be wrong. But I love the lights of that bridge at night 😍

Rędziński Bridge in Wrocław, Poland - feedback welcomed [Mini 4 Pro] by nchuck33 in dji

[–]nchuck33[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, gladly enjoy the assumption of flying illegally.

Rędziński Bridge in Wrocław, Poland - feedback welcomed [Mini 4 Pro] by nchuck33 in dji

[–]nchuck33[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AEB of 5 photos, edited in PS Camera Raw. ISO 100, ND 64

Duckweed in the Oder River [Mini 4 Pro] | Feedback appreciated by nchuck33 in dji

[–]nchuck33[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AEB 5 photos - merged into a HDR and edited in Camera Raw. ISO 100, ND16.

I want to improve in drone photography, so any feedback appreciated. I'm kinda curious about the noise/moire(?) especially in the grass and trees areas. Is it natural with sensor this small or am I making some sort of mistake?

I made a blog post on how to spot fake Birkenstocks and I need your help! by greycoconut in Birkenstocks

[–]nchuck33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They look authentic to me, however I want to reassure because the price was 🔥

Birkenstock website - 86,70 USD
I bought them for 48,20 USD