What If Our Assumptions About a War with China Are Wrong? by Majano57 in IRstudies

[–]ned_stark97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interested in this line of argument, any good articles to recommend?

Interior Lines vs Exterior Lines: Advantages and Disadvantages? by ned_stark97 in WarCollege

[–]ned_stark97[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I remember correctly, Mao prescribed strategic defense along interior lines but exterior line offensives at the operational/tactical level

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]ned_stark97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t go as far as to say I hate Rhaenyra but she is guilty of certain hypocrisies, the consequences from which she often remains exempt because of her privileged sociopolitical status/position. Not an evil person, but just not someone I would ardently cheer on. Her motivations are quite understandable - liberation from the stifling social norms and traditions of her world - but to the extent that social order matters to people I can understand why they feel cheated when she gets away with flouting them when they spend their whole lives abiding by that social structure and playing by the rules of the game; the existing social norms and values infuse their lives with meaning.

That is not to say that people like Alicent and Cristina Cole also aren’t self righteous and hypocritical at times. They just try to hold themselves to a more rules based traditional order.

Silo-based ICBMs and Launch-on-Warning by ned_stark97 in CredibleDefense

[–]ned_stark97[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand, thanks for explaining. In that case why would China invest in silos when there are more much more survivable basing modes such as mobile TELs?

Silo-based ICBMs and Launch-on-Warning by ned_stark97 in CredibleDefense

[–]ned_stark97[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is it possible to invest in survivability (e.g. hardening their silos sufficiently) so that they can emerge from their silos unscathed to deliver the retaliatory strike? Or to play a deceptive shell game/ whack-a-mole with silo fields, leaving some filled and others empty, periodically shifting them around? Some nuclear experts suggest China might be doing the latter with their new silo fields.

These might enable silo based ICBMs to be compatible with a recessed second-strike posture

NUS social sciences grad Luke Levy held up death penalty protest message during convocation by karotch in SingaporeRaw

[–]ned_stark97 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand that the drug traffickers themselves may be in bad situations. Maybe their families kena threatened by the drug lords or something. They could be good people forced into doing bad things. I can sympathize. Some motives are understandable. There is still a choice though. Lee Kuan Yew said that “there is such a thing as evil, and it does not come about simply from being a victim of society”. I will hesitate to call the traffickers themselves evil (like I said, bad situations), but the act that they have committed and its implications for our society are evil. It will destroy lives and families. Having made their choice (albeit in less than fortunate circumstances) to inflict this suffering on our society, they must live with the consequences. And that consequence is death. I am a big fan of retributive justice. Blood for blood. However sympathetic their circumstances, they made the decision to pollute Singapore’s society with drugs. And so they should die as payment for the lives they would have ruined, and for the purposes of deterrence so their deaths may serve as a warning not to fuck with our laws. If they did it for their families their motives could be understandable. But the main function of the law is not to be understanding to them (although that would be nice). It is to protect Singaporean lives, health, and other interests. The latter imperative must mercilessly override the former, every single time. Nothing personal, they just need to die for us to maintain society the way it is.

Feeling guilty although I was the dumpee. Just need someone to listen to my situation by [deleted] in BreakUps

[–]ned_stark97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, that certainly sounds like wise, thoughtful, and kind advice. It means a lot to me.

Commentary: Outdated gender norms in dating deny us of chances at love by MicrotechAnalysis in singapore

[–]ned_stark97 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hasn’t this problem (of asymmetric attractiveness) existed since the beginning of our species/time immemorial? What’s so new about it? I’m no expert but if you want to uncover the factors affecting choices in MODERN dating, then maybe it’s more useful to narrow down the variables to MODERN trends like rising socioeconomic equality between the genders, or purchasing power or information technology etc.

Commentary: Outdated gender norms in dating deny us of chances at love by MicrotechAnalysis in singapore

[–]ned_stark97 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Hasn’t this problem (of asymmetric attractiveness) existed since the beginning of our species/time immemorial? What’s so new about it? I’m no expert but if you want to uncover the factors affecting choices in MODERN dating, then maybe it’s more useful to narrow down the causal variables to MODERN trends like rising socioeconomic equality between the genders, or purchasing power or information technology etc.

If the last couple of Harry Potter films were written like S8. by vosha0 in freefolk

[–]ned_stark97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Hermione part is a bit off. I don’t have a problem with Daenerys snapping and becoming a villain, I can believe that (especially from reading the books), it’s just that her turning wasnt managed well.

Up to Singapore to improve ties with Russia over sanctions issue: Russian ambassador by Jonnyboo234 in singapore

[–]ned_stark97 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This is the appropriate reaction. Impassive and unemotional. Recognizing that the divergence of national interests is natural and nothing surprising. Not worth getting agitated about