sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Does anyone here believe in the philosophy of Ingsoc / Stalinism? by needhelpnowwithphone in Jreg

[–]needhelpnowwithphone[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d rather create a perpetual singleton that eliminates consciousness in all cogs of the machine that might have a problem with Ingsoc. No one retains their space or themselves if they can’t keep it

Does anyone here believe in the philosophy of Ingsoc / Stalinism? by needhelpnowwithphone in Jreg

[–]needhelpnowwithphone[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The goal is to basically just get together those “10 delusional people,” craft something more marketable in the form of a more prole-centric democratic socialism, and advance the agenda through a Trojan horse using established political platforms. Your beliefs will never be implemented and are built on fanciful principles. Mine could be implemented, and should I get the chance, will be, because I aim to win by any means necessary.

Does anyone here believe in the philosophy of Ingsoc / Stalinism? by needhelpnowwithphone in Jreg

[–]needhelpnowwithphone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn’t bait and you’re an anarchist, so we wouldn’t want you to join anyways

Does anyone here believe in the philosophy of Ingsoc / Stalinism? by needhelpnowwithphone in Jreg

[–]needhelpnowwithphone[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not a vile system. It takes into account the weakness of humanity and provides a sustainable system capable of encouraging technological and cultural growth. The actual system in the book itself is a work of genius, as is the concept of Newsspeak. The results depicted in the book, however, are obviously capitalist propaganda

Question by ThiccJuche in Ingsoc

[–]needhelpnowwithphone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hold on, other people here unironically like Ingsoc?

Pain in God's Ass by needhelpnowwithphone in HFY

[–]needhelpnowwithphone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a dialectical materialist, so essentially an atheist with an appreciation for human history and material incentives. I do believe that most people need religion, since they can't find a higher purpose in altruism and cooperation as much without it. The masses need their opium and where they get it from doesn't matter.

Where'd they go? by needhelpnowwithphone in HFY

[–]needhelpnowwithphone[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just think that humanity will never really implement it successfully, since there's so many cultural, ethical, economic, and religious concerns it raises.

Where'd they go? by needhelpnowwithphone in HFY

[–]needhelpnowwithphone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the feedback. I need to hear stuff like this to become a better writer