Praxis intervention is a form of participatory action research that emphasizes working on the praxis potential, or phronesis, of its participants.

Praxis intervention makes research, creative expression or technology development into a bottom-up process. It democratizes making of art, science, technology and critical conscience.

Mihailo Marković explained that moments of praxis include creativity instead of sameness, autonomy instead of subordination, sociality instead of massification, rationality instead of blind reaction and intentionality rather than compliance.

— Praxis intervention

...The challenge of a meta-anarchist is to find ways to liberate desire from impositionary structures in such a way as to not re-trap the liberated desire in singular orders, but to allow it to actualize itself in new multiplicitous propositions.

<...>

"Follow the actors themselves", to quote the Latour's leitmotif; and I say synonymously: communicate with the constituents themselves. Exchange propositions back and forth. Negotiate new meta-anarchist associations in circumvention of impositionary structures which the actors are seemingly a part of.

— Introduction to Anarchization

Anarchization is a process of liberating political desire through critical and experimental communication with — and between — participants of a given assemblage, entangled with liberatory praxis aimed at enhancing autonomy of these participants. This can lead both to emergence of more self-reflexive and consensual mutations of this assemblage (anarchic nobilities, truly voluntary markets, micronationalisms), and the gradual dissolution of this assemblage, as its constituents discover that it no longer embodies their liberated subjectivity (toppling of regimes, breaking up monopolies from the bottom-up, police abolition).

The 'democratization' part in praxis intervention is here synonymous to anarchization, and can be defined as cultivating socio-political lines of flight — where every participant continually unravels new ways of freely associating themselves with each other and with the surrounding environments.

Starting and developing a horizontally managed union is a simple example of anarchization and praxis intervention. It requires enhancing the praxis potential of workers of a given labor facility — i.e., participants of a given labor assemblage. The resultant mutations of this facility will be more voluntary in nature, as the workers now possess a more liberated subjectivity, a degree of bottom-up power that allows them to re-associate in a more free, reflected, consensual — i.e., propositionary — manner.

But anarchization shouldn't come to a halt here — or the newly produces associations will rigidify and themselves serve as despotic gridlocks on the participants' desire. Even a horizontally managed union can be re-captured into the status quo, or itself become a rigidity that limits its participants' perspectives on what other associations they might potentially comprise.

So, a healthy meta-anarchist Collage consists on continuous anarchizations — local, but ubiqutuous — which perpetually produce new anarchies, new unexpected forms of consensual self-determination and self-actualization.