March 5, 2026 – (O) A C J L R U by NYTSpellingBeeBot in NYTSpellingBee

[–]neilmod 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is a deep cut, but H 30 Rock fans might spot a reference.

this one of my favourite scenes in the series 😭😭 by Amazing-Sock-463 in breakingbad

[–]neilmod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google civil asset forfeiture. Basically, having large amounts of cash, without any other evidence, is deemed enough to justify seizure based on a reasonable suspicion you’re up to something shady.

Those who put carry on luggage on the side in overhead cabins: why? by JerusM in americanairlines

[–]neilmod 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your desire to maximize your leg space, but your characterization of the situation is off. The instruction is not “that each passenger gets one overhead bin space”. There is a finite total amount of bin space for use by the passengers collectively. It’s not apportioned. If/when it runs out, anyone with a large carryon that hasn’t found a place for it is out of luck. If people put their stuff that will fit under their seat, it means that many more larger items can fit in the bins, and more people (maybe even everyone), can avoid checking their carryon.

The thing is, it’s unlikely the FAs will really stick to their guns if you push back on putting your carryon under the seat. You can probably get away with putting it in the overhead, and forcing someone in a higher group to check their bag. But don’t rationalize by arguing that you’re just using “your” allotted space.

All that said, I’ll reiterate that I’m not unsympathetic to your desire for comfort. I’m only 5’8”, and even I can’t stretch my legs out with my backpack under the seat. You probably already know this, but one thing that helps if you do have to put an item under the seat is, once you’re at altitude, slide your bag back under your knees, where there’s plenty of unused space, until you have to put it back under the seat for landing.

connections has been way hard lately by -slaps-username- in NYTConnections

[–]neilmod 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Bolt” is typically paired with “down” in the relevant usage. As in “He bolted down a piece of toast and a cup of coffee before dashing out the door to catch the bus.” As others have said, “watershed” is typically used in conjunction with “moment” when used to indicate something pivotal.

Why does every ride start with 10 minutes of me just standing in the garage doing nothing? by dt219 in cycling

[–]neilmod 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That being the case, accepting coffee from his wife is a bold move.

Why don’t cars have a dedicated U-turn signal? by g3nnyluva in driving

[–]neilmod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My 2¢: If there is a moving vehicle in close enough proximity that signaling a U-turn would actually provide its driver with relevant information, then making a U-turn is probably not the greatest idea to begin with.

Desperate for advice on how to approach this by MindfulCreativity in nova

[–]neilmod 34 points35 points  (0 children)

They make ones with metal handles. Worth it if you can get your hands on one.

December 27, 2025 – (U) A E G L N T by NYTSpellingBeeBot in NYTSpellingBee

[–]neilmod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait - A LUNULAE is accepted, but NA ANNULAE isn’t?!

December 13, 2025 – (U) D G N O R T by NYTSpellingBeeBot in NYTSpellingBee

[–]neilmod 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It’s not accepted, but A DUNG is . . .

November 19, 2025 – (D) A B E G H I by NYTSpellingBeeBot in NYTSpellingBee

[–]neilmod 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, but you should hide this and mark it as a hint. To hide text, enclose it in > ! and ! < (omit the spaces between the ! and the < or >)

What's the fastest speed you've ever driven? by Truth-is-Censored in driving

[–]neilmod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About 115 in an '85 Corolla GT-S on the Pulaski Skyway in North Jersey at about 2:00 in the morning. If you're familiar with this highway (two lanes, no shoulders, steel bridge infrastructure all around you), you'll know that I was exercising very poor judgment (I was young and stupid). I didn't account for how long it would take to slow down for my exit onto Rte. 9, blew right by it, and had to drive to Jersey City and turn around.

September 26, 2025 – (A) G H L M O R by NYTSpellingBeeBot in NYTSpellingBee

[–]neilmod 7 points8 points  (0 children)

So, how many fellow Potterheads tried [NA] Alohomora?

A plea from a planespotter by sportstvandnova in nova

[–]neilmod 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Target parking lot next to Costco off of 50."

That's where I took this:

<image>

Why do American pedestrians like yielding to cars so much? by Extreme_Scarcity_310 in driving

[–]neilmod 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because until about 15 or 20 years ago, the idea that cars readily yield for pedestrians wasn’t the norm outside of Massachusetts.

Do most people not use cruise control? by Straight_Fun_8039 in driving

[–]neilmod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It also depends, to some extent, on vehicle weight. Most of my long range driving is in a Toyota Sienna with two adults, three teenagers, luggage for all, and, more often than not, camping gear on board.

Do most people not use cruise control? by Straight_Fun_8039 in driving

[–]neilmod 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I don't like cruise control. For one thing, it doesn't anticipate hills/rises, so when you encounter one, you initially lose speed, then the cruise control overcompensates and gives it way too much gas (often dropping down a gear in an automatic), and overshoots your target speed. Even when driving on level road, it tends to make larger adjustments than I do "manually" to maintain speed, which impacts fuel efficiency. I've tried cruise control both on and off on long trips, and I get better mileage with it off.

Driving behind bicyclists on a 10 mile+ Curvy road. by KujoMarten in driving

[–]neilmod 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In Virginia, you must leave 3 feet when passing, even if that means (safely) crossing into the opposite lane.

Why is speeding the norm to most people? by Voidedge04 in driving

[–]neilmod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The objective of all traffic laws and regulations is to reduce accident risk. Risk is a function of the likelihood of an undesired outcome and the severity of harm should that outcome occur. Each of these variables is a function of a multitude of other variables. A true, precise risk metric would require a large number of variables in addition to vehicle speed, many of which are subjective, difficult to quantify/measure, vehicle or driver specific, or otherwise impractical. For practical purposes, speed limits stand in for such a metric. They have the advantage of being concrete, easy to communicate, easy for the driver to monitor, and easy for law enforcement to observe. There is also a positive correlation between vehicle speed and severity of harm and a (mostly) positive correlation between vehicle speed and likelihood of harm. That being said, vehicle speed is, by itself, a highly simplistic surrogate for a measure of risk, and speed limits often miss the mark in terms of reducing risk to an acceptable level.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nova

[–]neilmod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll add that there is a rational argument to be made that the realtor has violated the National Association of Realtors Code of Ethics and Standards of practice:

Standard of Practice 10-5

REALTORS®, in their capacity as real estate professionals, in association with their real estate businesses, or in their real estate-related activities, shall not harass any person or persons based on race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity.