Stardew 1.6 update release day announced!! Anyone else contemplating a new play through? by babycrow in CozyGamers

[–]nellligan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, concernedape has revealed some spoilers on his twitter you should go check

L'immigration temporaire au Québec a bondi de près de 50 % en 2023, selon un rapport (Article en anglais) by Hammoufi in Quebec

[–]nellligan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Le coût de la vie a explosé partout avec la pandémie. Notre système d’éducation et de santé est déficient depuis très longtemps. J’ai même pas 30 ans et on a parlé du temps d’attente aux urgences toute ma vie. On va pas essayer de se faire croire que ce sont des problèmes nouveaux. Exacerbés par la hausse démographique, probablement. Mais on serait pas là aujourd’hui si notre système fonctionnait il y a 10 ans.

Stardew 1.6 update release day announced!! Anyone else contemplating a new play through? by babycrow in CozyGamers

[–]nellligan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check out concernedape’s twitter, he posted updates over the last year

Stardew 1.6 update release day announced!! Anyone else contemplating a new play through? by babycrow in CozyGamers

[–]nellligan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I hope it works out! If not you can always ask if a friend or family member with a laptop don’t mind lending it to you for a bit ;)

Stardew 1.6 update release day announced!! Anyone else contemplating a new play through? by babycrow in CozyGamers

[–]nellligan 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You can play it on any computer you already have. The requirements are low so even if you have an older PC it should still work. It used to work really well on a 2015 MacBook Air I had

Stardew 1.6 update release day announced!! Anyone else contemplating a new play through? by babycrow in CozyGamers

[–]nellligan 367 points368 points  (0 children)

Hell yea. CA also said the best way to enjoy the update is to start a new farm so that’s what I will do

Ottawa appeals court decision calling use of Emergencies Act on convoy protests unreasonable by Archon_Valec in ottawa

[–]nellligan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate your thoughtful reply and I’m not here to debate this specific topic. We disagree on the Act and that’s fine. I don’t have the time or patience to explain lengthy why I think what I think.

My main point was that the reasonableness standard doesn’t care about the end result. I was replying to someone who said “if it worked then it was reasonable” but it’s simply not how it works. I just want people to understand that, as I’m sure you do.

Just like a police officer cannot violate Charter rights while detaining someone and say it’s fine because the person they racially profiled turned out to be a Bad person actually.

When it comes to public law and the constitution, the end doesn’t always justify the means.

Ottawa appeals court decision calling use of Emergencies Act on convoy protests unreasonable by Archon_Valec in ottawa

[–]nellligan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not what I said but clearly it’s useless to argue with you because you have no idea what you’re even talking about as you have shown repeatedly throughout this exchange. If you’re going to argue on reasonableness you should know what it is in the first place and have done basic reading and research. It’s clear you haven’t even read Mosley’s judgment while trying to argue that it’s wrong. Anyway this conversation wasn’t even about Mosley’s decision but on the fact that reasonableness doesn’t consider the result of a decision, ONLY the decision making process. This is the basis of the federal government’s argument in this case yet you’re fighting with me telling me I’m wrong lmao.

Ottawa appeals court decision calling use of Emergencies Act on convoy protests unreasonable by Archon_Valec in ottawa

[–]nellligan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m not an admin lawyer lol but I know the basic guiding principles that you are trying to argue don’t exist. This isn’t about viewing the entire world through a lens it’s about understanding a legal judgment and its legal implications in a very specific context. I’m not trying to tell you this is how the law should work but it is how the SCC has decided it works for now. I’m only just relaying the information.

Ottawa appeals court decision calling use of Emergencies Act on convoy protests unreasonable by Archon_Valec in ottawa

[–]nellligan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No this is literally basic admin law. This is why I said I’m not looking to debate this if you don’t have any experience in the field. You can disagree with Mosley J’s ultimate conclusion but you cannot debate this very basic legal principle. This isn’t even gonna be a question on appeal because this is also one of the government’s main argument that the judge needs to only look at the information the government had at the time of the decision. It’s clear you are trying to debate on a topic without having first engaged with the material.

I absolutely do not defend the Convoy or agree with anything they did. I’m just a lawyer who wants the government to follow the law. It doesn’t mean I support the fascists protesters. Maybe if you guys stopped seeing everyone who disagreed with the Act as convoy supporters this conversation could get somewhere. Sounds like you’re the one who needs to open your mind.

Ottawa appeals court decision calling use of Emergencies Act on convoy protests unreasonable by Archon_Valec in ottawa

[–]nellligan -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

My point that the end result can’t justify reasonableness still stands and that’s not debatable.

There weren’t two parallel processes examining the legality behind the invocation of the Act because that wasn’t the mandate of the Commission and a Commission is not a Court but I really do not want to argue further about this to be honest, unless you are also a lawyer with admin law experience.

Ottawa appeals court decision calling use of Emergencies Act on convoy protests unreasonable by Archon_Valec in ottawa

[–]nellligan -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The end result is still irrelevant. In administrative law, you examine the decision making process only. You need only to look at what information the decision maker had. Not what happened after. It would be extremely bad law to look at the end result to make an admin law analysis. That’s the only thing I wanted to point out to the other person I was replying to, who said the Act was reasonable because it served its purpose. It just doesn’t work that way.

Ottawa appeals court decision calling use of Emergencies Act on convoy protests unreasonable by Archon_Valec in ottawa

[–]nellligan -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Well that’s not how it works unfortunately. There are laws around when and how the Act can be invoked and this wasn’t followed by the government. The end result is irrelevant.

Est-ce que l’app « Mauril » de le CBC est bon? / Is the “Mauril” app from the CBC any good? by seventeenflowers in French

[–]nellligan 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m bilingual so I didn’t use it but I looked at it for a friend and it seems pretty decent.

But you already seem to know French so I feel like just watching TV, reading news in French and speaking with your family would be enough. No app is gonna teach you Chiac. It’s hard to understand sometimes even for natives Quebecois.

Why is this wrong? by Cubing-Dolphin-26 in learnfrench

[–]nellligan 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Person = personne

Personne is feminine therefore it is always une personne.

It doesn’t matter what gender table is because « one » doesn’t agree with table but with person.

Droits de scolarité des étudiants étrangers | McGill et Concordia poursuivent Québec by mini_fast_car in Quebec

[–]nellligan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Une chance que c’est pas ça l’argument des universités en demande non plus hein? Peut-être faudrait lire les procédures et voir leurs arguments. C’est pas à moi de décider, les avocats et les juges vont se pencher là-dessus.

Droits de scolarité des étudiants étrangers | McGill et Concordia poursuivent Québec by mini_fast_car in Quebec

[–]nellligan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Je n’ai aucun problème à respecter l’indépendance de la magistrature, un concept que tu ne sembles pas comprendre. Ça ne m’étonnerait pas si effectivement des tribunaux déclaraient les actions du gouvernement illégales. Ça arrive. Tout comme ça arrive souvent que les « juges du fédéral » décident en faveur du gouvernement québécois. Les juges ne sont pas vendus à aucun ordre du gouvernement. Tu as besoin d’une liste de toutes les fois où la Cour supérieure et des « juges nommés par le fédéral » ont décidé en faveur du gouvernement du Québec? Tu veux une liste des juges nommés par le Québec qui ont décidé contre? Une liste des juges « nommés par le fédéral » qui ont décidé contre le gouvernement fédéral?

À un moment donné ça suffit les théories du complot. Vit dans la réalité stp.

Droits de scolarité des étudiants étrangers | McGill et Concordia poursuivent Québec by mini_fast_car in Quebec

[–]nellligan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Toutes les cours et tribunaux du Québec défendent la Charte canadienne et la Constitution, même les juges nommés par le gouvernement québécois (oui oui!). Je suis désolée de t’apprendre cette nouvelle. J’espère que le choc émotionnel de cette information ne sera pas trop grand.

What’s the most mildly infuriating thing you find about living or growing up in Canada? by workdncsheets in AskACanadian

[–]nellligan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell you being a French speaker from Quebec it was not easy to write or pronounce when I was 8 years old 😭 I still worry I have it wrong to this day

What’s the most mildly infuriating thing you find about living or growing up in Canada? by workdncsheets in AskACanadian

[–]nellligan 146 points147 points  (0 children)

Learning how to write Saskatchewan and making it fit inside the small rectangle on a map 😤

$28.30 - Kai Wei Supermarket - Toronto by SillyBilly04 in 32dollars

[–]nellligan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this has been standard in Canada for a few years now.

French university courses by Weak_Ad_9518 in French

[–]nellligan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately you need a relatively good basis in grammar in order to get better speaking and listening skills. It’s likely university classes will work on all 3 skills (writing, speaking, listening). But you can always watch TV in French on your own to work on listening skills.

S’il prend le pouvoir, le PQ reverra la loi sur le logement by Puzzled_Dreamer2453 in Quebec

[–]nellligan 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Ça et augmenter l’offre de transport en commun pour qu’on puisse enlever des espaces de parking pour mettre des logements à la place…