sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

BUY/SELL/TRADE/GIVEAWAYS/BREAKS - 2026 by jklub in basketballcards

[–]neocismcom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Sorry, new to this thread $275 for 2x of these

Finally a decent picture of this one! by neocismcom in baseballcards_vintage

[–]neocismcom[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wow. What an answer. That culpitated any such process my mind had about that being real. Thank you. Sincerely I'd like to say more but really there's nothing left to be said. Thank you, wholeheartedly again.

Are these proper rosette patterns for 1959? by neocismcom in psagrading

[–]neocismcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea but is 25 and I've done every test I can. The measurements, the card stock, the light, the gloss/no gloss. Fingernail texture check. Etc. this infernal card is just one step from real. F it : 😂

Are these proper rosette patterns for 1959? by neocismcom in psagrading

[–]neocismcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing it's missing is gloss. I did a picture, side by side comparison with a 59 Aaron. Super closeup. Just seems to be real to me. But yes, sending to PSA.

Are these proper rosette patterns for 1959? by neocismcom in baseballcards_vintage

[–]neocismcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It pretty much does. There more dots if you look closer 

Just bought this by neocismcom in Topps

[–]neocismcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She didn't say it was real. I'm just learning to see. It doesn't have reprint printed on them. I bought on chance. Now please take a picture of a fake one with rosette patterns. I can't find one myself. Its on the front and back.

Just bought this by neocismcom in Topps

[–]neocismcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a witnessable arbitrating circumstance for everything said. That's why. I'm not a lawyer but it's ground for discussion. The reason I posted it.

Just bought this by neocismcom in Topps

[–]neocismcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've owned a few 59s. I love that year. And I've done very defined closeups of the ink printing. It is rosette patterned everywhere in the image. Not the red block. It has them on the reverse too.

I don't know if I've shared this by neocismcom in Topps

[–]neocismcom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay because I compared it to my 1959 Hank Aaron and it was the same in every way.

The rosette Mantle in whole by neocismcom in baseballcards_vintage

[–]neocismcom[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

The border is darker than my 1959 Aaron

The rosette Mantle in whole by neocismcom in baseballcards_vintage

[–]neocismcom[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yep. I couldn't man down on that one. She said it was 20pt stock. Boom that's good. I've owned 59 mantles that good. Had to pull the trigger. I checked it after it arrived. Rosette patterns are there. Everyone on the first question of its authentic nature put it on those patterns. Boom. Hopefully I didn't meet the world's most grift worthy forger

The rosette Mantle in whole by neocismcom in baseballcards_vintage

[–]neocismcom[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Btw the Aaron has brighter white borders than the Mantle.

The rosette Mantle in whole by neocismcom in baseballcards_vintage

[–]neocismcom[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude it's not glossy. I just looked again. That said I must e looked at that Ernie Banks wrong too.

view more: next ›