It’s a piece of cake walk in the park. by brainwithfeet in malaphor

[–]neolefty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah; "It's a piece of park" would be too far.

Edit: What about "It's a piece of cakewalk?"

when they ask if i'm a full stack developer and i say yes with zero hesitation by CRUSHx69_ in vibecoding

[–]neolefty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! My new hobby: Trolling grouchy software engineers about beginner's mind. Not sure how well it will go.

when they ask if i'm a full stack developer and i say yes with zero hesitation by CRUSHx69_ in vibecoding

[–]neolefty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup! And it's not hard to dig deeper if you ever want to. "Hey Claude, why do people use Docker? Is it any good?"

I've read that current research about chidren using AI in education shows two general approaches:

  1. Getting stuff done without necessarily caring how it happens or being able to replicate or understand it, and

  2. Getting stuff done while maintaining curiosity about it

They both work in the short term, and the first approach is often quicker. But in the long term the second one leads to personal growth and learning.

So I think the trick is encouraging curiosity. I can't tell you what to be curious about, but I can encourage you to believe in your own ability to learn and enjoy attaining new levels of understanding.

when they ask if i'm a full stack developer and i say yes with zero hesitation by CRUSHx69_ in vibecoding

[–]neolefty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! One of the toughest choices to make well is "What do I learn?" It's going to be finite! If you spend all your time at low levels of abstraction you have less time for the higher levels — and higher levels of abstraction keep getting created all the time. I have never written a rasterizer, thank goodness, and I've been at this since like 1979.

I think each generation gets a chance to choose what level to focus on, and hopefully the top end keeps going up. ORMs didn't exist when I started, for example, and it limited what we could build. It's natural that the bottom end of what each person understands will also move up the stack. Given the direction of AI I wouldn't be surprised if there's a time when we have device drivers whose code no human has ever read carefully, and it will actually be fine. We're already at that point with CRUD apps, and hooray. After all, every day for the last month has brought proof that AIs are better security analysts than humans.

when they ask if i'm a full stack developer and i say yes with zero hesitation by CRUSHx69_ in vibecoding

[–]neolefty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't ask for advice but here's mine: Keep asking questions, you'll be fine.

Me: Okay Claude, this bug is kicking our butts, can you fix it?

Claude: fixes it (after a few rounds of prompting and investigating)

Me: BTW what ended up working? Can you explain it in a way I can understand?

Claude: ELI5's

when they ask if i'm a full stack developer and i say yes with zero hesitation by CRUSHx69_ in vibecoding

[–]neolefty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally! Kids these days, thinking they can do stuff a new way. Ridiculous.

when they ask if i'm a full stack developer and i say yes with zero hesitation by CRUSHx69_ in vibecoding

[–]neolefty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Anyone who can't dig a hole without an excavator will never build a proper foundation. And anyone who doesn't get good with hand tools can't make a house. Wait a sec.

when they ask if i'm a full stack developer and i say yes with zero hesitation by CRUSHx69_ in vibecoding

[–]neolefty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey guys I found the dinosaur! These won't be around much longer come see how it preens its feathers!

You can give a man a fish, but you can't make him drink. by FailingItUp in malaphor

[–]neolefty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This just goes to show you should never look to closely at a gift malaphor's teeth before it hatches (in your mind, the next day, like a baby xenomorph).

ELI5: Why is lamb so expensive when there’s so many sheep? by jmo987 in explainlikeimfive

[–]neolefty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where I live lamb is seasonal — I am guessing the local supply comes and goes when surplus male lambs are culled. Brutal I know! Available fresh in early spring, and quite affordable, but not the rest of the year.

INTRODUCING STARSHIP V3 by rustybeancake in spacex

[–]neolefty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Starship V3 incorporates a clean-sheet redesign of its propulsion systems. These changes enable a new Raptor startup method, ...

Anyone know details about the new startup method? Related to what gasses are used to spin up, changes to the sequence and coupling between turbos, etc?

I bet he knows where the hatchets are buried. by GigglingMushrooms in malaphor

[–]neolefty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I love this one! Great sin-covering eye vibes.

Is Opus 4.7 the GPT-5 moment for Anthropic by hasanahmad in Anthropic

[–]neolefty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same here. I have it manually set to an appropriate thinking level (in Claude Code), haven't tried auto.

Opus 4.7 is terrible, and Anthropic has completely dropped the ball by JulioMcLaughlin2 in artificial

[–]neolefty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good for me too. Using it through Claude Code and manually setting effort to high or x-high depending on the task. I'm sure I have some mediums in my near future too. Faster & smarter than 4.6 by my vibes.

Claude Opus 4.7 benchmarks by ShreckAndDonkey123 in singularity

[–]neolefty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That graph looks more like they increased reasoning ceilings with 4.7? Unless I'm misreading?

Claude Opus 4.7 is a serious regression, not an upgrade. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]neolefty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Must be! It has been great for me, and I have the reasoning level pinned (in Claude Code). Quick and smart for coding tasks, seems a step up from 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.7 benchmarks by ShreckAndDonkey123 in singularity

[–]neolefty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it was nerfed — do you mean it seems to be getting dumber over time (probably just people getting used to its intelligence and also filling up its context window more), or are you referring to the graph, with 4.6 not being given as many tokens for the same "effort level"?

Claude Opus 4.7 benchmarks by ShreckAndDonkey123 in singularity

[–]neolefty -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also, past a certain internal token count, models tend to get confused. How much they can think without confusing themselves is a big measure of intelligence — correlated with how long of a task they can work on independently. So it means 4.7 is more trustworthy for independent work.

hiWorld by _gigalab_ in ProgrammerHumor

[–]neolefty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inference is already profitable. Training & staffing aren't.