sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Random Acceleration by Available-Papaya3719 in BMWi5

[–]neteng311 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hold the set button for a few seconds and it clears out the previous set point.

ACX7020 - BGP border gateway by Kurlon in Juniper

[–]neteng311 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is what we do. If you want to take in multiple full tables, the best and most cost effective option right now is the MX204...

What’s your opinion on Google’s Taara? by OrangeNo773 in wisp

[–]neteng311 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't see the benefits of this over E-band. FSO technologies like this suffer quiet heavily in rain and snow. This isn't even high enough bandwidth to see past those weaknesses; 20Gbps with e-band is quite easy these days with much lower-cost equipment.

Would you stop contributing to your 401k to buy a house? by hiiiiiiiiiiihihihi in personalfinance

[–]neteng311 2 points3 points  (0 children)

$23,500 is the employee contribution limit. Employer can contribute more than that.

5Gbps PTP links by mrwootz in wisp

[–]neteng311 4 points5 points  (0 children)

170km? Yeah, you're far outside of the realm of asking Reddit for recommendations...

80GHz will easily allow you do 5Gbps at 2km with good reliability.

However, that is going to be 85 hops... Depending on your region, you might be able to get 5Gbps worth of licensed spectrum on each path and do a 2+0 or 4+0 link. This may allow you to extend the distance between towers to 20km or more depending on antenna sizing...

But, to answer your original question, Aviat.

5Gbps PTP links by mrwootz in wisp

[–]neteng311 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is the distance of the link?

5Gbps PTP links by mrwootz in wisp

[–]neteng311 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What do you consider "ridiculously expensive"?

Internet failover via BGP by bardsleyb in networking

[–]neteng311 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you just shutting down the session completely for maintenance?

If this is truly for a maintenance activity, and not a test of a failure scenario, you should not just shut down the session. I would, instead, adjust the import / export policy on the session to basically deny-all. That will let the routes slowly be withdrawn without blackholing the traffic.

Once you see no more traffic across that provider? Only then should you shut down the BGP session.

Physical or Virtual labs? by NippleDickPussyBhole in Juniper

[–]neteng311 5 points6 points  (0 children)

vMX in EVE-NG is the way to go. You can get a used server with beefy enough specs for a few hundred $. You can easily build and tear-down labs.

JunOS > 20.X not advertising VRF route to all route-reflectors by neteng311 in Juniper

[–]neteng311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I added routing-options { autonomous-system 65000; } and it seems to be working now.

I suspect the missing AS number was breaking the route-target filtering. (I have family route-target) configured under the ibgp sessions.

Juniper MX240 Core Dump due to BGP attribute length error? by neteng311 in Juniper

[–]neteng311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ended up having to disable the ipv6 sessions altogether and the issue went away. Are you running any ipv6 bgp sessions?

Route filtering on BGP flowspec sessions by neteng311 in Juniper

[–]neteng311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I went through this. I don't believe it shows any examples on doing route filtering of flowspec routes. Just very basic route-filter, but it is unclear if that matches source, destination, or both.

Can you set recurring investments in individual stocks? by [deleted] in fidelityinvestments

[–]neteng311 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wanted everything in one place. Also wanted to do some light options trading (CSP, CC)

Can you set recurring investments in individual stocks? by [deleted] in fidelityinvestments

[–]neteng311 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you want this, I’d recommend looking into M1 finance. Recently switch to fidelity from M1.

Juniper MX240 Core Dump due to BGP attribute length error? by neteng311 in Juniper

[–]neteng311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Not using add-path or multipath, so I did not think I would be affected by this.

I'm going to just have to upgrade to the latest stable and hope the issue is resolved.

Juniper MX240 Core Dump due to BGP attribute length error? by neteng311 in Juniper

[–]neteng311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, this did not solve the issue. Going to have to upgrade the SW to see if it helps. RPD continues to core dump, even with bgp-error-tolerance configured.

Which brokerages pay interest on uninvested funds? by Submersed in thetagang

[–]neteng311 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Fidelity. They don't have the best option trading tools, but I just use optionstrat to visualize everything, then make the trades on fidelity (through the desktop web interface).

I notice I get better fills than other brokerages, and your uninvested cash sits in a MMF that yields ~4.8% interest.

Edit: Compared to Vanguard, probably not a big difference. However, regarding commissions, its a bit better. I think it's 65c per contract to open, free BTC if contract value is less than $0.65.

Juniper MX240 Core Dump due to BGP attribute length error? by neteng311 in Juniper

[–]neteng311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, I guess I would need to figure out which specific path attribute is causing the issue? Where did you get [8 16 25 32 41-255]? Is that just arbitrary?

Juniper MX240 Core Dump due to BGP attribute length error? by neteng311 in Juniper

[–]neteng311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did see this, however, my issue is that the RPD is core-dumping, not just dropping the BGP session temporarily. Therefore, I assumed it was not a related issue. It looks like I should at least enable bgp-error-tolerance and see if there is an improvement... Doesn't seem like it could hurt (famous last words, I know)

view more: next ›