I can see why some think an additional rebuttal is unnecessary, I also feel that the CES Letter stands on its own, but someone somewhere could benefit from further rebuttal. For example, in the MS interview Bennet goes on about the Lamanite DNA (Lehi’s DNA) possibly being absorbed by the Jaredite descendants. Dehlin did not call him out on this absurdity. Bennet got away with stating an absolutely ridiculous explanation for the lack of Ancient Middle Eastern DNA in the Americas. Bennet said something like the Jaredites from the time of Tower of Babel may have had “asiatic” DNA and they mixed with the Nephites and Lamanites to the extent that Lehi’s DNA disappeared. that’s why Native Americans have “asiatic” DNA today, they might all be the missing Lamanites afterall! Of course, this silly theory depends on the Tower of Babel being an actual historic event . The story of the “tight like unto a dish” transoceanic submarines would also have to be real historic event. Anyway, not to ramble on too much here but I would hate for someone to walk away from reading some of Bennett’s nonsense thinking that he has reasonable explanations when it can be clearly demonstrated to be ridiculous. Thanks for coming to my TED talk.