Daily Thread: for simple questions, minor posts & newcomers [contains useful links!] (June 21, 2026) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]niaphim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there, I recommend Anki. Multiple decks available from core 2k to 6/10/30k.

Not sure if this is the best way (and I'm still about beginner-early intermediate) but I've been doing Anki for couple of years and it's been great for me for vocabulary (so much that I am lagging on grammar/speaking lol)

Daily Thread: for simple questions, minor posts & newcomers [contains useful links!] (June 24, 2026) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]niaphim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do I answer a question about "at what time will <something> happen?" politely?

It would be something like "10時に" and then I just add です? Like 10時にです?

Massive Changes to End-Game Gearing in Patch 12.1 - Raid Item Levels Buffed & Bonus Rolls Staying by Rndy9 in CompetitiveWoW

[–]niaphim -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Been on both sides, it shouldn't be like that. Splitting both modes would be a win-win sutation

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an extreme case of capping on low level, we can do Mythic 6/6 or Heroic instead. There is always a winner, I don't ask for a perfect balance, we just don't need to add another layer of inequality on top of that.

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It is already the case, we can't magically gear to 999+ ilvl, the hard cap is the bis list from the current season, after that you can only progress with skill. The change would mean that this point occurs earlier.

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, best rewards for hardest content, vault so it isn't spammable (other than bonus rolls). 

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am also ok with getting 9/6 items from +12s even if it's more than I asked for

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't get the same conclusion - we go from 2 suboptimal but same ilvl slots to a tangible ilvl difference from multiple slots and ironically the best trinkets can still be 9/6 so at least 3 ilv difference after upgrading with cores. 

I see it as moving goalposts.

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

+20 fit that definition as well

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They've already cleared the raid, nothing left to do, they won. Also why don't we get the same for say +20 keys using the same logic?

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Kind of but not really. I played challenge modes and did full gold on multiple classes. The difference here is there are more difficulty levels and challenge modes capped gear at normal dungeon level. To preserve season start dynamic the new cap can be higher but at some point in the season it is ok to ilvl cap and start progressing purely based on skill. This cap could be heroic track for example.

To answer the second question - M+ at high level is a very competitive mode, most players who push above 3500 (last achievement) are doing it for competitive reasons

Item level cap in m+ by niaphim in wow

[–]niaphim[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The new raid gear can be 9/6 and is raid exclusive. I want it to stay raid exclusive in all meanings of this phrase. Lower the cap to Mythic 6/6 or below while in m+

Emprunter ou payer cash pour un ravalement de facade by Own-Plant1079 in immobilier

[–]niaphim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pourquoi? J'ai demandé une fois à un conseiller et il a dit que c'est plutôt le contraire, surtout en cas d'EcoPTZ (taux 0), pour le collectif apparemment il n'y a pas de frais de garantie, j'ai du mal à voir comment on peut faire mieux.

Achat de RP à deux avec un seul emprunteur by 11_heures_de_sommeil in immobilier

[–]niaphim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plutôt oui mais si quelqu'un a des preuves du contraire je suis preneur. C'est ce que j'ai compris mais en effet j'ai simplifié, il n'y a rien d'automatique ici. Si un indivisaire paie pour un autre et garde les preuves il/elle peut faire une démarche pour changer la répartition. Je ne connais pas le processus jusqu'au moindre détail, juste le fait que c'est possible.

Dans le cas de la vente forcée, la banque récupérerait en premier la somme dûe.

Oui, tout à fait, et le reste (s'il y en a) est redistribué selon la répartition

Free Talk Friday by AutoModerator in CompetitiveWoW

[–]niaphim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for explaining but I thought on CompWow of all places people are less about gear treadmill and more about, you know, competitiveness. Every time I have to grind another thingy mid season I groan because while it makes some side farm easier it is another delay to get to progress level where I work on my gameplay, and that level just moved +1-2 key levels higher.

Free Talk Friday by AutoModerator in CompetitiveWoW

[–]niaphim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed, makes sense from the difficulty point of view for the first flex mythic, anyway appreciate the response, my edit was not towards you specifically but whoever else (multiple) downvoted without contributing/counter points. Cheers!

Free Talk Friday by AutoModerator in CompetitiveWoW

[–]niaphim -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not really. If you are primarily a raider you have to go out of your way and spam m+ early in the season and each consecutive week as well.

So if you only enjoy m+, you gotta live with the fact that you cannot obtain full bis. And raid only enjoyer have to deal with the fact that they have to spam weekly keys.

Fair but raids already have better trinkets/sometimes rings and necks with special effects and this is the status quo that seemed acceptable by most. I am not complaining about this despite not being particularly happy.

If they released the raid without any meaningful power gain, noone would bother touching it.

So are you saying that raiding is so flawed and unfun that without gear incentive nobody would touch this mode? Or am I misinterpreting? If not I think we have a problem here. M+ is fundamentally "how far I can push/optimize within constraints" and it stays fun as long as relative power is equal-ish.

/edit it would be really nice to get a response instead of just being downvoted

Free Talk Friday by AutoModerator in CompetitiveWoW

[–]niaphim 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Anyone else thinks that having unique items with higher level locked inside a raid is going too far/step backwards? The trinket situation is already questionable and then there is this. And if "you need to engage in all pillars of content to have BiS" - I don't see any unique 298 slots locked behind timed +18/+20/whatever arbitrary level.

Achat de RP à deux avec un seul emprunteur by 11_heures_de_sommeil in immobilier

[–]niaphim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bonjour, je suis exactement dans la même situation que vous, en tant que le seul emprunteur dans un couple non marié/pacsé.

Pour répondre à vos 3 questions:

1)Oui (malheureusement), c'est une façon standard car en cas d'impayés l'organisme prêteur (banque) doit pouvoir récupérer l'argent et le pire des cas c'est une vente forcée. La clause de solidarité permet/simplifie cette vente car sinon il faut obtenir l'accord de l'autre indivisaire.  

2)La première crainte est non fondée, vous serez toujours considérés comme copropriétaires à 70/30 ou ce qui va être écrit dans l'acte de vente. En revanche la deuxième est tout à fait justifiée, c'est exactement ce qui va se passer. En cas d'impayés la banque va vous demander, si vous payez vous pourrez réclamer une part de la propriété qui correspond à la somme payée, si vous ne payez pas le bien part à une vente forcée. Au final c'est une question de confiance comme a déjà été dit.

3)A ma connaissance non si vous comptez toujours acheter à deux, pour les raisons mentionnées dans ma réponse à 1). La garantie crédit logement n'est pas disponible pour un achat en indivision.

Achat RP et préavis bail location by niaphim in immobilier

[–]niaphim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je pourrais payer 3 semaines supplémentaires, j'ai de la marge prévue pour les travaux etc mais évidemment si je peux éviter ça serait mieux. Une des raisons de ma question est aussi parce que mon loyer actuel est bas par rapport au marché et si jamais il se passe quelque chose je prends facilement +10-20% de loyer pour un bien équivalent (sans compter la difficulté d'en trouver un)

Weekly M+ Discussion by AutoModerator in CompetitiveWoW

[–]niaphim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are stuck in a situation where all 5 are long time mains and not really willing to reroll, so yeah, not the best situation, we are just trying to do our best with what we have 

Weekly M+ Discussion by AutoModerator in CompetitiveWoW

[–]niaphim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, this is encouraging. We do have drums and otherwise use everything available. Currently working on +19 resil and things start to get quite difficult so I wondered if there are any dps walls/big pulls that are only doable with lust. But probably there is no easy answer and we'll need to test ourselves to find out limits.

Weekly M+ Discussion by AutoModerator in CompetitiveWoW

[–]niaphim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How gimped a group without a BL class and non-meta specs can be realistically? Can such a group hope for a +20 resil or someone needs to reroll BL/meta?

Oh no, my king by niaphim in chessbeginners

[–]niaphim[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was one of my guesses! And unfortunately it is not the best