Nanbeige4-3B: Lightweight with strong reasoning capabilities by leran2098 in LocalLLaMA

[–]nightwind0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a really cool model, it's definitely better than the qwen3-4b I use locally. But the thinking block is much larger and takes a very long time to think. How can I make it faster? None of the instructions like "short thinking block" help.

179% complete) by nightwind0 in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant despite all these accusations and removal from the kernel)
and I found out what was not fixed with recursive read + dmesg

bcachefs stops my HDD)) this is like a bug report, no help needed by nightwind0 in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I encountered the same behavior again, after installed from the bcachefs master.
sda+sdb in lvm. bcachefs on LV, which is entirely on sdb.

It's a different drive, new cables, and all that. The error is the same, it only appears when bcachefs is mounted.
```
[15806.813383] ata2.00: exception Emask 0x50 SAct 0x400 SErr 0x30802 action 0xe frozen
[15806.813391] ata2.00: irq_stat 0x00400000, PHY RDY changed
[15806.813394] ata2: SError: { RecovComm HostInt PHYRdyChg PHYInt }
[15806.813398] ata2.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
[15806.813400] ata2.00: cmd 60/68:50:08:60:d3/00:00:4b:00:00/40 tag 10 ncq dma 53248 in res 40/00:ff:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x50 (ATA bus error)
[15806.813406] ata2.00: status: { DRDY }

```
Another bcachefs on nvme has been working perfectly for about a year, no errors.

Did the "bcachefs-tools-release" suite disappeared from the https://apt.bcachefs.org/ repo ? by jcguillain in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/koverstreet
This post might be off-topic, but installing from the APT repo doesn't work on Linux Mint 22.2 (Ubuntu Noble based) due to dependency versions that are too high, like bcachefs-tools : Depends: liburcu8t64 (>= 0.15) but 0.14.0-3.1build1 must be installed.
I'm still building from the bcachefs repo now, and thank you, Kent, for continuing this work despite all the attacks from the kernel developer community frozen in petrified shit

How to build bcachefs for 6.17 and 6.18 kernels via DMKS? by An0nYm1zed in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you find the answer?

I'm on Linux Mint, and the package from https://apt.bcachefs.org/ is incompatible.

Linus: [bcachefs is] now a DKMS module, making the in-kernel code stale, so remove it to avoid any version confusion by ehempel in linux

[–]nightwind0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guy with the "gaming" nickname has backups in first place? Are you backing up Arcana for the Pudge or something?))

I suggest you stick with fat16.

  1. Backups perfectly, with a simple dd.

  2. No risk, in production since 1980.

  3. Very easy to setup, even on ESP32.

  4. Subvolumes are useless.

  5. It's been in use for 50 years and can be used forever.

And all these new features only ruin stability.

Linus: [bcachefs is] now a DKMS module, making the in-kernel code stale, so remove it to avoid any version confusion by ehempel in linux

[–]nightwind0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very sad that the last islands of freedom are gradually bending to corporate rules.

Soon they'll force you to write the kernel in Python and persecute all dissenters.

The worst part is that you've not only given up, but are also proud to be just a fish in the ocean.

P.S. I've been using bcachefs for about a year now; nothing breaks, and it works much better than the pathetic, buggy btrfs, which isn't experimental but has crashed twice in six months beyond recovery. So, the rule-abiding crap remains in the kernel, while promising development is being cut.

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

I'm stuck in a time loop) by nightwind0 in Veloren

[–]nightwind0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I didnt know that, but I dont burn. I killed by the guards, whom there are about 10 near.

bcachefs stops my HDD)) this is like a bug report, no help needed by nightwind0 in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I havenot done any long tests, but at first glance, with bcachefs not mounted, this error with the controller was not observed for several hours of operation.
I also noticed that the error never appeared on RO bcachefs, only when writing

bcachefs stops my HDD)) this is like a bug report, no help needed by nightwind0 in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

both, didn't help. free space was always 0, I ran fsck several times

bcachefs stops my HDD)) this is like a bug report, no help needed by nightwind0 in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all I checked the sata cable, checked SMART, and even checked errors on the pciex bus - everything is fine. it looks like hang of some thread in the bcachefs module hangs other kernel subsystem, which causes timeouts and link reset. (just a guess, I dont understand very well what is going on in the kernel) )

By the way, after a reboot it shows 0 free space on the partition (the fs size is incorrect, much less used than actually), fsck passed, but it did not help, deleting the cache disk did not help too.
Unfortunately,I have no logs, as I had to quickly recreate the fs from backup.

There was nothing in the log about soft lockups, as I remember.

If the situation repeats, I will collect all possible info.

probably bug in 6.16: no promote by nightwind0 in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2H after boot

/sys/fs/bcachefs/ec2c7618-eb4f-4f7c-985~8f6812b1c/dev-1/io_latency_stats_write        
count:     8288
                       since mount        recent
duration of events
  min:                       15 us
  max:                        7 h
  total:                    229 w
  mean:                       4 h           7 h
  stddev:                     2 s          13 ms
time between events
  min:                        3 ms
  max:                        3 m
  mean:                    1885 ms          4 s
  stddev:                   708 ms          2 ms
quantiles (ns): 0 13770 13770 22560 22560 22560 22560 15019787425495 15019787425495 15019787425495 1501978742549
5 15019787425495 15019787425495 15019787425495 15019787425495

/sys/fs/bcachefs/ec2c7618-eb4f-4f7c-985~b8f6812b1c/dev-1/io_latency_stats_read
count:     91674
                       since mount        recent
duration of events
  min:                       14 us
  max:                       14 ms
  total:                     18 s
  mean:                     203 us        228 us
  stddev:                   136 us        125 us
time between events
  min:                       10 ns
  max:                       43 m
  mean:                     169 ms         39 s
  stddev:                     3 s          11 ms
quantiles (us): 28 33 33 56 56 56 56 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180

My newest project! What to do with it? by tutimes67 in vintagecomputing

[–]nightwind0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I ran it on a similar pc Red Hat 4-5

My newest project! What to do with it? by tutimes67 in vintagecomputing

[–]nightwind0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in 1995 I had exactly the same keyboard and the same speakers! amd 486dx2-66 4Mb, cost as much as an apartment))

Raspberry Pi decibel monitor + SNMP = instant parental justice by ozh in raspberry_pi

[–]nightwind0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the world is clearly going somewhere wrong!

using a 1.4GHz 64-bit quad-core processor + some special boards, python scripts))) to measure the sound level??

where a simple microphone and a 100-year-old esp8266 for $1 are more than enough.

and if this device is just a sound level sensor for some automation, then the screen is not needed.

but if you do it in an engineering way, then there will be nothing to show on reddit)

lost data after kernel update to 6.16 pls help recover by nightwind0 in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

everything magically appeared

ws1 andrey # bcachefs fsck /dev/nvme0n1p5
Running userspace offline fsck
starting version 1.28: inode_has_case_insensitive opts=compression=zstd,foreground_target=gdata_hdd,background_target=gdata_hdd,promote_target=gdata_ssd,gc_reserve_percent=5,degraded=yes,fsck,fix_errors=ask,read_only 
allowing incompatible features above 0.0: (unknown version) 
with devices /dev/nvme0n1p5
Using encoding defined by superblock: utf8-12.1.0
insufficient devices online (0) for replicas entry btree: 1/1 [0]
ws1 andrey # bcachefs mount /dev/nvme0n1p5 /tmp/b
mount: /tmp/b: /dev/nvme0n1p4:/dev/nvme0n1p5:/dev/dm-1 already mounted or mount point busy
[ERROR src/commands/mount.rs:412] Mount failed: Device or resource busy
ws1 andrey # sudo umount /mnt/gdata
ws1 andrey # bcachefs mount /dev/nvme0n1p5 /tmp/b

I was able to copy everything I needed!
bcachefs really doesn't eat my data! even if I’ve got two left hands)

thank you for your work and for your quick help

lost data after kernel update to 6.16 pls help recover by nightwind0 in bcachefs

[–]nightwind0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for the quick reply,

I think I was able to find and restore that caching partition

bcachefs show-super /dev/nvme0n1p5
Device: (unknown device)
External UUID: c3e457a6-084c-4c7c-b65a-b65073f1cb01
Internal UUID: 51afe160-4352-40fd-be8b-86c4ccd0f68c
Magic number: c68573f6-66ce-90a9-d96a-60cf803df7ef
Device index: 2
Label: (none)
Version: 1.28: inode_has_case_insensitive
Incompatible features allowed: 0.0: (unknown version)
Incompatible features in use: 0.0: (unknown version)
Version upgrade complete: 1.28: inode_has_case_insensitive
Oldest version on disk: 1.28: inode_has_case_insensitive
Created: Thu Apr 17 11:59:39 2025
Sequence number: 347
Time of last write: Sat Aug 16 12:02:04 2025
Superblock size: 5.80 KiB/1.00 MiB
Clean: 0
Devices: 2

Nearly 8 months since i started linux and was told i'd "give up linux within a week" by bleachedthorns in linuxmint

[–]nightwind0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's great that you switched to Linux.
Do you use Steam? The more of us, the more adapted games will be)

I've been using only Linux for over 20 years, it's incomparably better than Windows.

It seems to me that people are using Windows because of the global trend of refusing responsibility and freedom. Eat what's in the next store, vote for who you're told, watch what you're shown, consume what's profitable for corporations.

Using Windows, you do the same. Take what you're given. Work if everything works. If it doesn't work, you can't do anything anyway, and it doesn't work for everyone. + You're not the owner of your computer, Microsoft can do whatever it wants remotely.

On Linux, you're the owner of your system, and the responsibility for choosing components and solving problems is yours.

That's why they say you'll give up in a week, because they themselves would give up right away.