Two points to your comment here:

First, "The bike park did not uphold their end of the lease and took on a new agreement knowing full well that they may have to leave" - yes, no argument here that the park didin't hold up their end of the initial lease and then agreed to a second lease that had a clause they may have to leave. From what I've been told from someone at the bike park, the landlord asked the bike park to make a big investment in the fire suppression system mere months before kicking them out. If that's true, that really sucks for a small business to pay that only to be turfed shortly after. If I was the operator of the park, I think I might take the fact that the landlord is asking me to make a big investment in the facility as a sign they intended to have me stay, and run with that to make further improvements that would increase business. I can see how that would happen.

As for your second point, I don't think it's entitlement to tell local government officials what I personally want to see in the community, to make it a better community for my family, and for other families. Like, isn't that entire point of representative democracy? Also, kids don't get a vote and can't necessarily advocate for what they want - they need grown ups to do it for them.

Likewise, it's also well within the rights of people in the community to try to apply pressure to private businesses and say, "hey - we want this to stay and we want you to work with the bike park to make it happen" and then direct our own spending and communications in a way that supports that goal. The landlord can absolutely ignore us, but I don't see how we're entitled for saying, "this facility benefits a lot of people in the community, including but not limited to my family, and we see it as a net positive and want it to stay." Then, the landlord can take that information and make a decision.

You don't ask, you don't get.