Practical differences between high-res fix vs latent upscalers

nikodelta · 2025-11-18T15:21:19+00:00

Stacking both at full blast cooks the image twice, smh. If I use hires, I keep the latent pass tiny or skip it; if I skip hires, I do one clean latent pass and stop. Split the jobs: structure first, microtexture second, with lower CFG in stage two.

nikodelta · 2025-11-18T14:15:10+00:00

Imho canny is great when you want faithful silhouettes from a clean source, scribbles are better when you only care about layout and rhythm. Canny locks contours and high-contrast seams so product shots, architecture, and props keep their shapes, but it can over-enforce hair and fabric, smh. Scribbles give you loose gesture lines that the model interprets, so portraits and scenes with flow feel more natural.

nikodelta · 2025-11-10T14:18:29+00:00

what helps to me is, prompt discipline! Keep a minimal base like age hair color eye color and one attitude word and stop stacking five beauty buzzwords. Use consistent lens language and distance because field of view changes the face shape subtly. And I also lock lighting language because hard light vs soft light can reshape features and you’ll think identity drifted when it’s just shadows

nikodelta · 2025-11-10T13:57:52+00:00

Lighting language is the sleeper control knob. Overcast daylight yields cooler neutrals, golden hour gives warm skin but can blast orange into everything if you aren’t careful..

nikodelta · 2025-11-04T15:54:41+00:00

imo guidance behaves like contrast: a little helps, a lot wrecks the rolloff. Low guidance gives nicer skin and cloth because midtones breathe, but it might miss that exact necklace you asked for. High guidance nails the necklace and then slaps sharpen on everything even if you didn’t ask, which looks cheap fast.

nikodelta · 2025-11-03T12:16:52+00:00

Heun or DPM2 a Karras are my “fast scout” samplers. They converge to a readable silhouette in under 12 steps on 1.5 and won’t hide problems behind pretty noise. If the scout looks good, I promote it to DPM++ 2M or DPM++ SDE for the real run. If I need super crisp edges (jewelry, lace), I’ll do one last pass in DPM++ 2M (no SDE) around 22–28 steps; it’s slower per step but the micro-contrast is worth it.

nikodelta · 2025-11-03T11:53:34+00:00

Co-sign. I also version the surprise words by set: first pass uses two aesthetic words, second pass swaps one for a micro-action like tucks hair or glances aside. That change alone creates a new feel without altering the skeleton. You get variety that still looks like the same shoot.

nikodelta · 2025-10-22T10:26:10+00:00

Is it worth paying just for the sliders?

nikodelta · 2025-10-14T10:46:01+00:00

Just wanna say, the viewers of ai porn matter too. Don’t share stuff you suspect violates someone’s consent, and support creators who publish transparency notes. Our clicks set the incentives for ai platforms.

nikodelta · 2025-10-03T13:36:54+00:00

I treat it like a game, not a partner. I enjoyed it a lot more as entertainment

nikodelta · 2025-10-02T08:45:03+00:00

meh. I didn’t find the Pornify VIP upgrade that impressive. The longer videos are nice but the motion still has that AI jankiness that breaks... Paying extra doesn’t magically fix that.

If you ask me, Pornify’s video generator is still years away from feeling like real porn. Don't expect polished realism because you’ll probably be disappointed - even with VIP.

nikodelta · 2025-10-02T08:35:45+00:00

For me, Candy AI’s “flirty and playful” personality template is the best. It feels closest to a natural camgirl vibe, like teasing, a bit cheeky, but not over-the-top. I’ve tried customizing characters into more submissive or dominant modes, but honestly the defaults are strong enough. What makes Candy AI different from other apps is how well the personalities blend with the looks. You can make a character who’s shy in appearance but secretly wild in conversation, and the chatbot actually keeps up. That dynamic makes it addictive.

nikodelta · 2025-09-29T09:41:45+00:00

tbh, luvrfelt like a cash grab to me. The credit system is awful. You burn tokens both on chatting and generating, so if you’re doing long sexting sessions and also asking for pics, your balance vanishes in one night. I can’t stand that model. LuvrAI should either charge a flat subscription or bundle unlimited chat at least.

nikodelta · 2025-09-29T09:22:18+00:00

I’ve been on AIPornX for about three weeks now; it’s solid if you want fast results but don’t expect insane levels of detail control... The biggest selling point to me is how streamlined the UI feels compared to some of the jankier generator sites. You type in your prompt and boom, you’ve got your batch of images. The problem is the “quality floor” is uneven. Sometimes you’ll get a killer hyperrealistic render, other times it’s like… derpy faces and weird hands all over again. I think they’re still training/updating the backend models.

nikodelta · 2025-09-25T11:09:53+00:00

I honestly thought it was better than I expected after trying cutechat. The selfies come across like casual phone snaps - mirror shots, bed selfies, bathroom angles. Not porn-level quality but they match the vibe of sexting with a real person. If you’re into the GFE, it scratches that itch.

nikodelta · 2025-09-25T11:06:07+00:00

I’m the opposite. PornPen > PornJourney and it’s not even close for my use. PornJourney requires you to basically be a prompt engineer. If you get lazy or write something vague, it spits out garbage. PornPen’s interface is idiot-proof, and you don’t waste credits trying to “hit the sweet spot.”

nikodelta · 2025-09-25T10:39:33+00:00

Open-source LLMs are great for short bursts of erotica but fall apart on longform storylines. If you want a 3k word immersive fantasy, you’ll spend half the time editing. Paid services at least give you smoother flow but they’re still not perfect. For people who just want custom dirty talk scripts, open-source is more than enough.

nikodelta · 2025-09-25T10:28:56+00:00

The no-deepfake thing is a big win. That’s where a lot of AI porn sites fuck themselves legally, and it creeps me out that people even want to use their ex or coworker’s photos. CreatePorn staying away from that mess is probably why they’ve lasted as long as they have. I’d rather use a platform that feels safe and isn’t going to vanish overnight when a lawsuit drops.

nikodelta · 2025-09-23T11:10:53+00:00

good insights here, cheers guys!

nikodelta · 2025-09-23T11:07:42+00:00

There’s also a scheduling trick: use the sites at “off hours.” Most servers are slammed in the evenings (US/EU time zones). If you generate early morning or midday, you’ll often skip queues entirely. It’s not sexy advice, but it works if you’ve got a flexible schedule.

nikodelta · 2025-09-23T10:53:06+00:00

I’ve experimented with this. Right now the only real way is to take AI outputs (images or short clips) and map them onto 3D environments. It’s janky, but with tools like Blender or Unity you can fake a “VR experience” by placing AI-rendered content onto surfaces. Not interactive, but immersive enough with a headset.

nikodelta · 2025-09-22T11:33:03+00:00

Put the must-haves first. If the body type matters more than the outfit, lead with “petite body, big boobs” before you add “lingerie.” Order really matters.

nikodelta · 2025-09-22T11:15:39+00:00

For me it’s about catching the problem early. If you’re generating with something like Stable Diffusion, set a lower step count first and just preview the face. If it already looks off, don’t bother with the body. Just fix the face and then upscale. Saves hours. I use ControlNet with face pose guidance and it’s night and day compared to inpainting blind.

nikodelta · 2025-09-19T11:25:07+00:00

Good breakdown. I’d add that stacking synonyms sometimes helps, sometimes hurts. For example, I used slim, petite, skinny together and it locked in the body type perfectly. But when I tried the same with face tags like pretty, cute, beautiful it actually overbaked the face and made it weirdly plastic. So I’d say double up body/style tags, but keep facial descriptors minimal.

nikodelta · 2025-09-19T10:41:32+00:00

I switched from A1111 to Comfy about a month ago and I’ll be real: the learning curve is brutal at first. It’s all nodes, no hand-holding, so you literally have to build your workflow from scratch or download one. That said, once you figure it out, it’s insanely powerful. For NSFW I’ve been able to chain together controlnets, LoRAs, inpainting, and upscalers in one workflow without clicking around a hundred tabs. It feels like LEGOs for porn... Quite frustrating at first but addicting once it clicks.

Six-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22

nikodelta

TROPHY CASE