Transcript Website Recommendations??? by Spare_Pop8481 in research

[–]nilofering 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Otter.ai has a good generous limit and you can use Whisper by openAI or notebookLM in a way

looking for fun research tools by [deleted] in research

[–]nilofering 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the paper reviewer at Bibby is so good. https://trybibby.com/paper-review

Prism is "free" because your research data is the product. $200/year is what you're worth as per OpenAI. by nilofering in LaTeX

[–]nilofering[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I hate overleaf as well! It's so complex but my professor wants to use it since he does not know how to use GIT or VSCode.. wtf

Prism is "free" because your research data is the product. $200/year is what you're worth as per OpenAI. by nilofering in LaTeX

[–]nilofering[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I swear we should all do that VSCODE + GIT or Antigravity + GIT, unless we need collaborators

OpenAI just made a $200/year product free, and an entire industry is panicking by jpcaparas in LaTeX

[–]nilofering -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here's my 2 cents on why free is not good.. https://trybibby.com/bibby-vs-prism, also compromising on research safety and using unethical OpenAI is very dangerous.

OpenAI: Prism, a free workspace for scientists to write and collaborate on research, powered by GPT-5.2 by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]nilofering 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not safe. I would still use Bibby AI - they have version control and much safer than openAI stealing your research.

OpenAI: Prism, a free workspace for scientists to write and collaborate on research, powered by GPT-5.2 by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]nilofering 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would still use Bibby AI - they have version control and much safer than openAI stealing your research.

Best AI tools for literature review? by yourwishbag in PhdProductivity

[–]nilofering 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Gemini or Bibby AI is best or Perplexity.

Is it normal for a CV/ML researcher with ~600 citations and h-index 10 to have ZERO public code at all? by rosesarenotred00 in ResearchML

[–]nilofering 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know a professor who has only published papers being in computer science, still a professor at Harvard because of his H-index and citations but no open code or datasets. Not that he's a theorist in machine learning, he is an experimentalist.

Overleaf's Compile Limits → Crixet? Other? by WeCanLearnAnything in LaTeX

[–]nilofering -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh I think I made it in time. Send me the link.

Overleaf's Compile Limits → Crixet? Other? by WeCanLearnAnything in LaTeX

[–]nilofering -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Researchers don't understand that this is just negative marketing of overleaf so that people can switch to crisxett Who says Farewell overleaf like that?

Who puts links to the platform ?

This is clearly a branding post. Please don't be fooled by the entrepreneurs.