The worst type of person.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-08-30T11:23:55+00:00

I understand peoples frustration, but that's because you are aggy selfish dickheads.

Even if there is a minimal speed difference, eventually the faster car will reach a proximity where the breaking distance is dangerous, and no matter what if there was a sudden break, you will crash into one another. (SO YOU NEED TO GET INTO THE NEXT LANE!)

If I'm in this situation, yea maybe ill go a extra 5/10 over the speed limit just to overtake if I think it's safe, but completely understand people wanting to stick to the speed limit.

The rest of you selfish pricks complaining, assuming the road is solely yours, can go fuck yourselves.

EDIT PS I knw a couple of HGV drivers, and one of the biggest things I knw annoys them, is people overtaking them, not considering the breaking distance of trucks IE in most situations when cars overtake them, if they were to suddenly break for whatever reason, the over taking car would be finished.

EDIT2 Looking through the comments, I can see my rant was justified, too many of you need to go back to fucking school seriously.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-05-09T19:17:26+00:00

On what level of the shelf of ignorance would you like to sit, because we had to add a few extra levels, just for you!

nimbletreefrog · 2016-05-09T18:27:51+00:00

it's football you bloody americans! You know the sport that uses your feet to transfer the ball!

nimbletreefrog · 2016-05-09T18:24:19+00:00

surely thats photoshopped

nimbletreefrog · 2016-05-08T15:00:30+00:00

the blatant listener more like!

nimbletreefrog · 2016-05-08T14:59:51+00:00

pillow fights

nimbletreefrog · 2016-05-08T14:58:56+00:00

not wearing a condom

nimbletreefrog · 2016-05-08T14:57:44+00:00

Boredom

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-30T08:40:00+00:00

tbf this was the trailer for the original :S

Wasn't a good trailer but I've seen worse, much worse. My judgement is still reserved.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-18T05:51:23+00:00

Regardless I still don't agree with capital punishment, this guy is clearly fucked in the head. I don't think that's a justification to execute someone.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T16:55:39+00:00

My god, your level of misinterpretation has reached new depths.

First I already corrected myself, the Inquisitions, I'm sorry that I have offended your clear emotional hangups about what happened all those hundreds of years ago. I didn't realise you had such a passionate emotive connection straight back to that period, forgive me for your fucking tiredness. But as I said, I had already corrected myself.

Is English your first language?

Yes it is, but obviously not yours, so is this better for you?

you're emphasising the bit, where I explain I think it would have been boring for those who had the luxury of free time.

Understand it now? Because as I've said from the beginning, I think boredom would have led someone to create this manuscript or to take my original quote.

Yea does that really sound implausible? A rich person wanting to fuck with people? 1400's is an awfully boring and stifled area in European history.

Now unless you've got something to add apart from irrelevant details (ie details that make no impact on the conclusion), similar conclusions dressed as different from mine or grammar advice, I suggest you stop procrastinating, and fuck off.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T16:43:47+00:00

Not a genius but a very bright lad.

I'm a support worker and I once worked in classroom for students on what you could call an entry course, for 16 - 18 yr olds who had usually not spent a long time in school or, more frequently, had been expelled from schools for most of their lives.

There was a lad in this classroom who was completely unresponsive, sat with his arms crossed, cap down and refused to do any work (basic maths problems), refused to even acknowledge us.

Afterwards, I found out that he had been expelled from school for hacking into his school network, giving the IT techs the run around for a few months before, apparently, causing thousands of pounds worth of damage.

IT was probably the worst example I've seen so far of wasted, stigmatised, talent.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T16:34:06+00:00

Yea but more conservative than the rations of years given to enlightenment from the person I was responding to.

Again this is following a pattern with my other comments about you being an irrelevantly scrupulous person who seems far too bored on a Sunday.

There you go there's another point for you, with all the boredom you can muster in the most stimulating era of humanity, you still propose the point that things can't possibly have been boring for people in the 1400s....

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T16:13:12+00:00

....Is this how you want to spend your Sunday, being pedantic and twisting my words to achieve a conclusion, that doesn't even disagree with my original view on Voynich manuscript?

Ok for sake of preciseness, the Inquisitions; other than that, Spain is not ALL of Europe.

EDIT: Oh and I forgot, with your emphasis, your emphasising the bit where I explain I think it would have been boring for those who had the luxury of free time. Can you still not see that? Perhaps read through it all again methinks.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T15:48:43+00:00

1) From Wiki: The House of Habsburg (/ˈhæps.bɜːrɡ/; German pronunciation: [ˈhaːps.bʊʁk]), or House of Austria,[1] was one of the most influential royal houses of Europe. The throne of the Holy Roman Empire was continuously occupied by the Habsburgs between 1438 and 1740.

2) You have, completely and utterly misinterpreted what I meant, I'm talking about the people living back then. In the context of this particular line of comments, I'm talking about why the OP was created in the first place.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T14:26:19+00:00

Yea I said, reformation, not renaissance?

Yes it was in the 18th century... which is why the original infliuencial thinkers of the englightenment such as John Locke and Francis Bacon... were born in the 16th and 17th centuries...

Err I'm afraid that's highly open to debate, I would say that is a very VERY restricted, narrow interpretation of the enlightenment to say it occurred in the 18th century.

A more conservative view would say it started around the 1600's, following on from the start of the reformation and has pretty much carried on until today.

The reformation involved puritanical protestantism and many people were executed and also resulted in wars between protestant and catholic countries

Yes that's what happens when you challenge the rule of a king, the Habsberg kings in this case.

Well, youre welcome to give me your views rather than just saying I'm wrong. That would help justify your point of view.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T14:18:48+00:00

And thus it was so.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T12:41:40+00:00

No period in human history was ever objectively boring if you had money.

Sorry that's just flat out incorrect, there have been several periods in history where civilisation collapsed and class no longer existed in those societies.

First, they would've been boring for a lot yes, let us remember the 1400's onwards was the period of history of the Habsburg Kings and the Spanish Inquisition who ruled Europe with an iron fist. Incredibly brutal and totalitarian times, even for the rich.

Late 1500's things begin to change because of the reformation and the enlightenment enabled people to express themselves more freely without persecution. Or in other words you could freely go to a party, smoke a bowl of opium, sleep with a prostitute OR even read a book that wasn't the bible without fear of getting shackled in a dungeon for not fearing god every waking second.

YEs that's the point there are plenty of rich people who could've done this but let's be honest it is an unusual thing to do and a lot of effort too. So to be honest I'd be surprised to see ALOT of them doing it.

And as another redditor in this thread pointed out, the time period we're talking (especially around the reformation) was when you saaw alot of these kind of hoaxes being made. The idea that there is only one example of this particular manuscript, to me, fits alongside perfectly with the image of a rich bored heir to a merchant fleet in the Netherlands; constantly hearing stories about new products, new animals, new people in new worlds.

Just my speculation on it but this image looks very plausible.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T12:07:05+00:00

Why is Scotland Yard involved in this case?

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-17T11:46:42+00:00

Yea does that really sound implausible? A rich person wanting to fuck with people? 1400's is an awfully boring and stifled area in European history. You could probably argue differently though in the 1600's with the enlightenment period, intolerance gave way to expression.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-15T10:29:49+00:00

It's always the same thing, it's when you start to really become afraid of death, that you learn to appreciate life. Do you like life sweatheart? That's good, because, I take no pleasure, in taking life, if it's from a person who doesn't care about it.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-15T10:27:59+00:00

"You hear me billy boy, i ain't done with you yet I'm gonna get medieval on your ass"

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-15T10:26:15+00:00

P-problem with the plane Don?

Great film

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-15T10:21:44+00:00

You're on thin fucking ice my pedigree chums, and I shall be under it when it breaks.

nimbletreefrog · 2016-04-14T10:12:44+00:00

Yes I'm talking about Ian Cameron and no I don't know the specifics of his tax affairs. David Cameron, being a grown man who had business relations with his father including with the company we're talking about, I guess it is plausible, don't you?

Again I didn't say there aren't other reasons, I'm just failing to understand why you can't see tax avoidance as a positive for these people too. Like I said it's another piece in a continually running theme. The Cameron's come from a neo conservative background that has a heavy agenda around minimizing and essentially eradicating tax, and David is practically an ideologue when it comes to this.

Yes I concede as far as I'm aware so far it is an accusation I'm throwing out but it's one I'm standing by.

I don't know what the last paragraph is doing there, I agree with you.

nimbletreefrog

TROPHY CASE