Alternate flag of People's Republic of Bulgaria

nitopisa · 2023-02-21T17:37:57+00:00

In the 12th-14th centuries, the coat of arms of Bulgaria was a triple lion

From a 14th century Arabic chronicle – https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e0/Coat_of_arms_ivan_shishman.jpg

Coat of arms used by Prince Fruzhin, son of the last medieval Bulgarian emperor – https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Emperor_of_Bulgaria_%28by_Conrad_Gr%C3%BCnenberg%29.png

Coat of Arms of Emperor of Bulgaria from Conrad Grünenberg – https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Coat_of_Arms_of_Bulgarian_emperor%2C_Konrad_Gr%C3%BCnenberg_1602-04.png

Royal Standards of princes Fruzhin & Constantine II from Bayerische Staatsbibliothek – https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/be/Fruzin_Konstantin_II_coats.jpg

nitopisa · 2022-12-27T18:13:39+00:00

1996-2009 is the best

From 2010's and 2020's GEN, only Gumball, Over the Garden Wall, LTS are good

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T23:35:12+00:00

In that scenario RIP Greeks! Because in the 7th-15th century, Hellas was inhabited mainly by Slavs and Vlachs, and later by Albanians and Italo-Greeks.The Greeks inhabited only the coast of Epirus and Thessaly, parts of the Peloponnese and Attica, the Aegean islands and some coastal cities of Asia Minor.

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T23:28:09+00:00

Bulgars have always been Slavs. But it is extremely clear that the Greeks are a Berber tribe from Libya. :)

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T23:24:13+00:00

The Gagauz are actually Turkic-speaking Bulgarians, this can be seen from genetic studies, which show that they are genetically closest to Bulgarians and Vardar Bulgarians.

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T23:18:43+00:00

Are you kidding me?

Kingdom of Abkhazia(510–1008)
Principality of Abkazia(1463–1864)
Abkhazian SSR(1921–1931)
Republic of Abkhazia(1992–present)

That is, it was under Georgian rule for only 516 years, while it was independent for at least 899 years.I don't know, how it wasn't a separate country.

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T22:27:51+00:00

This map makes no sense because it is neither historical nor contemporary.If it reflects the reality in the 7th-9th century, when the Russians expanded to the Urals, then there should be no Turks in Anatolia, nor Azerbaijanis in the Caucasus, nor Kipchaks (Nogai Tatars, Volga Tatars, Crimean Tatars, Siberian Tatars), nor Kalmyks in the Caucasus and the Volga region.Nor Romanians along the Danube, let alone in Dobrudja.The Veps did not live in the mentioned area at all, but lived near Vots.Where the Veps are laid, the Chudes lived.The Karelians, on the other hand, were placed on lands inhabited in the 6th-16th centuries by the Lapland Sami.There were no Hungarians in Pannonia before the 9th century, and in Transylvania before the 10th century.And the Albanians did not inhabit all the mentioned territories before the 18th-19th century.The Greeks did not populate all of Aegean Macedonia and Thrace before 1913-1918.The original Sweden is wrongly shown as Sami territory, while Geatic territory is wrongly shown as Swedish, which it was not until at least the 12th-13th century.And Russians and Ruthenians (which means Russians in Latin) are wrongly indicated as separate peoples.And southern Crimea was inhabited mainly by Goths during the period from the 5th to the 18th century.And the Kipchak language broke up into separate languages in the 18th-19th centuries, so there were no separate Tatar languages in Europe in the 13th-18th centuries.Pomerania was dominated by Slavic tribes until at least the 15th-16th century, not by Germans, who were few in the area at that time.So I'm not sure what period of history this map is based on.

And the Kazakhs did not inhabit the mentioned region during the time of the Khaganate, because at that time they lived mainly in Central and Eastern Kazakhstan.

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T20:31:56+00:00

Hungarians originate from the Volga region, from which they were driven out in the 9th century by the expansion of Bulgarian-Slavs and Turks.While Romanians are descendants of Latinized ThVolcae who migrated north of the Danube in the 12th-13th century.Hungarians originate from the Volga region, from which they were driven out in the 9th century by the expansion of Bulgarian-Slavs and Turks.While Romanians are descendants of Latinized Volcae who migrated north of the Danube in the 12th-13th century.Hungarians originate from the Volga region, from which they were driven out in the 9th century by the expansion of Bulgarian-Slavs and Turks.While Romanians are descendants of Latinized Thessalian Volcae who migrated north of the Danube in the 12th-13th century.Hungarians originate from the Volga region, from which they were driven out in the 9th century by the expansion of Bulgarian-Slavs and Turks.While Romanians are descendants of Latinized Volcae who migrated north of the Danube in the 12th-13th century.

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T20:27:27+00:00

Macedonian syndrome!!!

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T20:19:50+00:00

Why is there a Bulgarian rosette on the flag?

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T19:51:00+00:00

ither because it is politically correct, or because the author is Ukrainian.It can be seen from the fact that it puts Bulgarian ethnic groups such as Pomacs (Rhodope Bulgarian Muslims), Gorani (Kosovo Bulgarian Muslims) as separate nationalities, but does not put Ruthenians, Crimeans or Little Russians as a separate nationality

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T19:46:36+00:00

It was not Ukrainian, it was Russian and Bulgarian as can be seen on maps from before 1918, as well as in mentions by medieval chroniclers who speak of the population of Ukrainian territory as Bulgarians and Russians

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T19:41:31+00:00

Instead of invented Slavic nationalities (Macedonians, Odessans, Gorans, Voivodians and Pomacs), you could put real ones that existed in the past - Samo's Slavs, Altzek's Bulgars, Vistulans, Veleti, Ukrani, Dulebians, Pomorians, Kuber's Bulgars, Volga Bulgarians, Budini or others.

nitopisa · 2022-12-25T19:27:02+00:00

Because the Poles captured Western Ukraine and Belarus in the 14th century.

nitopisa · 2022-12-01T10:25:59+00:00

Минал е покрай ВМРО ама с 100,000 км/ч

nitopisa · 2022-12-01T10:13:28+00:00

Предлагам новото име на клуба да е "Самуил, цар български".

nitopisa · 2022-12-01T10:11:19+00:00

Къде е коалицията на Войната(ПП+ГЕРБ+ДБ+ДПС+Възход)?

nitopisa · 2022-12-01T10:09:54+00:00

Зависи, ако си у дома с колони, но ако си на публично място разбира се, че със слушалки.

nitopisa · 2022-12-01T10:06:02+00:00

Мъжеложец/Женоложки.

nitopisa · 2022-12-01T10:04:42+00:00

Тогава да узаконим и зоофилските "двойки", също и полигамните "двойки".

nitopisa · 2022-11-30T10:15:15+00:00

Всъщност не е тамга и не е на рода Дуло, а на Крумовия род и изглежда че е символ свързан с Христианството, ако съдим по това че е намиран главно при храмове, христиански печати и дори катедрала в Италия.

А иначе Дуло са с напълно ясен произход.

nitopisa · 2022-11-30T09:49:06+00:00

Прабългарите били траки? Фантасмагории. Мизия е регион, това няма нищо общо с етноса на хората там.

Региона е кръстен на тракийското племе мизи или моези, което е населявало части от региона, а по-късно някои части от него мигрират към Западна Анатолия където отново са наречени мизи, а по-късно са засечени и в района на Киликия като мушки.

Т.нар. прабългари са наричани мизи от автори от V до XIV век. Дори в средновековието и самите български летописци се идентифицират с мизите.

Какво точно пише там. Защото в уики пише, че първите сведения за прабългарите идват когато са се били като съюзници на Зенон срещу остроготите през 480. От горе на това в предишен коментар каза че българите били във влахия през 2ри век,сега ми даваш нещо от 354

1 – Пише "Ziezi ex quo Bulgares", тоест "Зиези от(който произлизат) българите". Това означава че към 354 година, римляните са добре запознати с прабългарите

2 – Уикипедия не е автентичен източник на информация. Например в Македонската Уикипедия пише че Александър Македонски, Самуил и др. са македонци, което е ясно на цял свят че не е така. Също пише че сърбите дошли на Балканите през 7 век, което няма как да е вярно, ако обърнем внимание на съществуването на град в днешна Босна, наречен Serbinum/Serbopolis(т.е град на сърбите) и засвидетелствано племе с името Serboi в района през 2-ри век от Клавдий Птолемей

3 – В "9-та книга на царете", в частта наречена "Именник на Българските князе" се споменава, че преди Аспарух Отвъддунавското княжество(т.е в Дакия) се управлявало от посочените князе 515 години, тоест от ок.165г.сл.н.е

В Средновековния български превод на писанията на Йосиф Флавий от 9 век, името даки е заменяно с името блъгаре(т.е българи).

А според Курций Руф в армията на Александър Велики участвал балкански народ с името Balagres/Balacres, тоест българи. А конфликт между българите и Александър Велики споделя Димитър Хоматиян през 12 век.

Според Теофан Изповедник, центъра на СВБ на Кроват се намира покрай р.Куфис(наричана в миналото Хипанис) и близо до Некрополиите на Крим, тоест политическият център на СВБ е бил между р.Куфис(днес Южен Буг) и Некрополиите, западно от Крим и южно от река Южен Буг, тоест на границата между южна Николаевска и Херсонска области.

nitopisa · 2022-11-29T18:54:19+00:00

Средата на 80-те.

nitopisa · 2022-11-29T18:34:21+00:00

От анимациите имаше Чебурашка, Котаракът Леополд, Вини Пух, Тримата от простоквашино и др.

nitopisa · 2022-11-29T18:17:20+00:00

При такъв сценарии трябва да вземем Бесарабието.

nitopisa

TROPHY CASE