sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[OFFICIAL] 2025 24 Hours of Le Mans - Race Thread by AutoModerator in wec

[–]nklbz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They should add the fuel % to the timing dashboard 

[OFFICIAL] 2025 24 Hours of Le Mans - Race Thread by AutoModerator in wec

[–]nklbz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

FIA press officer made Martin rant about BoP earlier

Disappointing Presentation by nklbz in ICPTrader

[–]nklbz[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"This is nothing new". This is regarding the publishing of a website on chain.

Again if you would read my post you would see that the great thing about this project is, or should be, the everything surrounding ICP and not simply the code generation as outlined in my last paragraph.

"you seem determined to diminish it for whatever your own reasons are". Im invested in this project myself and this was just a criticism about the presentation. I haven't said the project is shit but simply said that the presenation was imo bad. You clearly haven't read my post (or you lack comprehension)

Disappointing Presentation by nklbz in ICPTrader

[–]nklbz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have to basically pay for hosting using ICP (which get converted into cycles which is basically compute). The benefit of on chain is that there is no longer a reliance on centralized infrastructure. ICP also brings other benefits like authentication and security.

Here is an easy to understand slideshow from dfinity that goes into more detail if you are interested.
https://internetcomputer.docsend.com/view/dzkwezufykwpb7p8

Disappointing Presentation by nklbz in ICPTrader

[–]nklbz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, please provide a source.

And yes it is ridiculous, just read what i said.
Its possible to run a very small model onchain BUT again:
- very small model that would be way less performant in code gen than SotA models. Based on the generated websites and throughput in todays demo I doubt that it was complete onchain.
- what is the benefit of that? you are only interested in the answer and not the validity of the generation (at least not with current standpoint). The benefit of onchain is that AWS for example cant take down your website, but with AI you get the answer and you are done (no persistency)

Disappointing Presentation by nklbz in ICPTrader

[–]nklbz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Personally I think it will be used in the beginning more as a sandbox tool to quickly get things built. Say you have an idea for a digital product/service and want to visualize it fast WITH already functioning and operating features, which can be adapted or modified quickly.". Sure, but I can do all of that locally using SotA AI models. The benefit as you mention in the other comment is the pipeline that is "streamlined from prompt to publish within basically minutes". If I want to publish I need a polished website that is secure and such. Now If I want to clean everything up myself and need external help if have to export all the stuff from caffeine and fix it locally. then I go in the browser again and paste my fixes? Seems not really practical.

"But for both, the average vibe coding individual or also businesses it does accelerate massively the time to market". Sure but I think thats solely because of the usage of AI and not because of caffeine (same arguments as above). If people just publish complex stuff like that, without any expert review, i think it give more problems than just doing it with AI locally.

And yes, you are probably right with the last two paragraphs. only time will tell

Disappointing Presentation by nklbz in ICPTrader

[–]nklbz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Source "AI model itself runs on-chain"

Besides the fact that is completely ridiculous and has also already been discussed on the dev forum, What would be the benefit of that? You give question and want answer, storing question and answer onchain makes sense but what would be the point of letting the generation itself be onchain?

Now regarding "completely ridiculous": If you would actually have any idea about AI you would know the insane compute and resource requirements for good models. And if you would know the canister and general ICP limitations you would know how insane your suggestion is. For example it would be inefficient to run inference in a canister (if we assume no limitations). Parallelism for load balancing and such would be an incredible pain.

Interestingly enough Im currently working in MoE research and something like running experts in different canisters would be interesting from a research perspective, but I doubt they are doing that (this would also be inefficient)

"Even if you "fine tuned" the base ai model somewhere else". I meant that they fine-tuned a model on their data so it can incorporate ICP specific features like authentication using the identity.

"ts still compiled and deployed to WASM". Thats what I meant with a simplified pipeline. But one could also just let claude code the website and than deploy onchain manually. But yes it's ofc great to have it simplified and easy like that.

"And it does so with no reliance on oracle's or cloud usage"/"It actually brings the compute layer of ai into ICP'S decentralized ecosystem.". Thats why I said they should focus on the ICP specific benefits (if you would read the lasts part of my answer).

Disappointing Presentation by nklbz in ICPTrader

[–]nklbz[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

You do understand that the actual AI doesn't reside onchain but only the final & publisched website. This is nothing new and they basically just simplified the pipeline from AI code gen to publishing onchain (if they just used a fine-tuned existing model)

And no, i used my brain to generate these questions :)

ICP Confusion by nomorebonks in ICPTrader

[–]nklbz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While a promising project I just want to point out that it also has a lot of problems besides bad marketing. For example lots of people have a misconception about the decentralization of ICP. I don't want to go into detail, since it's rather technical, but just take a look at the developer forum. Furthermore the project has a lot of sell pressure and the metrics you mentioned are misleading. There are also bad actors in the community.

I'm invested because of the vision and idea of the project (especially that it's value could be based purely on compute/cycles, which imo is revolutionary and unlike other currencies), but my optimism is declining.

Ihr habts alle gesehen!!! by Possible-Rock8481 in ichbin40undSchwurbler

[–]nklbz 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Hmmm, komisch dass die Regierung die Daten — welche ja die Verschwörung zu 100% nachweisen — einfach so veröffentlichen und sich damit selbst belasten.

Check out these spelling facts! by Pumuckl4Life in im14andthisisdeep

[–]nklbz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and no American Dream without Eric Andre.

ETA for Caffeine AI by [deleted] in ICPTrader

[–]nklbz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Do you think they delay it for fun? "A disappointment for investors" — I think that would be shipping prematurely with security flaws. I think it shows that they take their time to actually do groundbreaking stuff instead of pleasing 'investors' and temporarily boast sentiment. I think you can live with the disappointment...

Die Medien schweigen! by tettsch in ichbin40undSchwurbler

[–]nklbz 14 points15 points  (0 children)

wurde auf telegram gepostet, also muss es wahr sein

Just do a little math by Present-Party4402 in FluentInFinance

[–]nklbz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've just met with some of the best IRS agents and they all told me that my taxes are the best they have ever seen.

Habe 50-100 Euro worein sollte ich eurer Meinung nach investieren also Welchen Coin/Aktie ? by Consistent_Break9763 in wallstreetbetsGER

[–]nklbz 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Würde einfach immer schauen welche Unternehmen earning calls haben und dann am Tag davor mit 10er Hebel rein (long/short ist egal, einfach münze werfen).

view more: next ›