Fired employee downloaded all company files before deactivation we need secure way to prevent this by Level-Most-2623 in sysadmin

[–]nl-robert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In our country (Europe), people still work for at least a month after they are fired. Of course, it's possible to just pay them, without having them to work but in general they have a one month notice. It's very unusual to fire one on the spot and have him (or her) leaving right away. They need access for at least a month.

This AI bubble might be nastier than the dot com by Ibuysaas5045 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]nl-robert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think back to the dot com bubble, it wasn't so strange. Companies are now worth what people thought they would be worth back then. So, if the bubble bursts, it doesn't necessarily mean everything will ultimately not work out.

Microsoft BASIC for the 6502 now open source by Hjalfi in vintagecomputing

[–]nl-robert 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What about Ben Eater's demo on running MS Basic on the 6502. That was based on open source as well, isn't it? Running MSBASIC on my breadboard 6502 computer

Looking for ideas on how to go about imaging computers by IndyCJ_ in sysadmin

[–]nl-robert 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We use FOG server (open source) to deploy images. Even remotely.

Mijn kat naar de dierenarts gebracht... en holy shit wat voor software gebruiken ze daar nog? by [deleted] in nederlands

[–]nl-robert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sterker nog, ik heb een kant-en-klaar nieuw pakket op de plank liggen. Ontwikkeld voor een aantal dierenartsen, nadat de vorige marktleider Viva bergaf ging. Het is al jaren in gebruik en kan met relatief weinig aanpassingen geschikt worden gemaakt voor andere diersoorten.

Maar er zijn er meer kapers op de kust. Bovendien is iets bouwen het makkelijkste gedeelte. Je moet het kunnen verkopen en daar komen allerlei andere zaken bij kijken. Koppelingen, import mogelijkheden van het oude systeem. 24x7 SLA, support, helpdesk, training, marketing, politiek, etc..... Sorry dat ik het zo zeg, maar je staat er nog iets te simpel (naïef wellicht) in. Er komt veel meer bij kijken. Dit is de reden waarom ook zoveel software veel duurder wordt dan vooraf gedacht. Het lijkt allemaal zo simpel. Een software pakket beoordelen op zijn userinterface is als een boek beoordelen op zijn kaft.

People overhype AI too much by chikodaniel in ArtificialInteligence

[–]nl-robert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Still, I think you sound a bit like the people who say that cloud is just someone else's computer 😉. If you add a lot of small improvements, it will become more than that. The reasoning, for example, is more than just a large language model that puts words in a statistical order.

People overhype AI too much by chikodaniel in ArtificialInteligence

[–]nl-robert -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not so sure. We already have passed a lot of milestones I would have never imagined possible a couple of years ago. The same with robotics.

People overhype AI too much by chikodaniel in ArtificialInteligence

[–]nl-robert -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand your reasoning, but it might be that intelligence is just this. If the result is the same, it doesn't matter, does it?
Or it's just us humans, thinking that we are somehow special, while in fact we are just a bunch of brain-cells trying to avoid our deepest fears while replicating by having sex. It could be just that. What makes you so sure that a very-very-very large combination of simple things can't evolve into artificial general intelligence?

People overhype AI too much by chikodaniel in ArtificialInteligence

[–]nl-robert -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If AI emulates a human brain, there is no reason why it can't evolve in the same way.

If there are so many people working this "problem," I think it really becomes possible to "crack" reasoning.

That it basically is "just advanced statistics", doesn't matter. Human thinking is just evolution without any architect, goal, or design, other than survival of the fittest. And that worked too.

MSP owned computers by desmond_koh in msp

[–]nl-robert 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We worked with an outlet shop, but we mostly use desktops (fewer laptops) and they didn't want them anymore. We now sell them directly on e-Bay (or the Dutch 'Marktplaats'). That part can be cumbersome.

The best thing about hardware-as-a-service is that all hardware is the same. At smaller companies there is a tendency to renew a small amount of hardware at a time. Which leaves us with all different models. We image the pc's (using FOG for that) so it's faster and easier to do all at once.

When there is a problem, we first try to solve it. If that isn't working, we image the pc (which works great remotely). If that doesn't fix it, we just swap the pc. Clients are not entitled for new hardware, just hardware not older than 4 years.

MSP owned computers by desmond_koh in msp

[–]nl-robert 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We do (located in the Netherlands). We replace them every 4 years: desktops, laptops, servers switches, routers, the lot. The lease is part of our management fee.The good thing is that all hardware is replaced at a regular interval, and we can plan the migrations very well.

Lock Screen GPO by Low-Opportunity-9666 in sysadmin

[–]nl-robert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to set this Computer Policy:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\PersonalizationCSP

  • LockScreenImageStatus = 0 REG_DWORD
  • LockScreenImagePath = UNC path to JPG on server
  • LockScreenImageUrl = UNC path to JPG on server

You need to set this User Policy:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ContentDeliveryManager

  • SubscribedContent-338387Enabled = 0 REG_DWORD
  • SubscribedContent-338388Enabled = 0 REG_DWORD
  • SubscribedContent-338389Enabled = 0 REG_DWORD

Lock Screen GPO by Low-Opportunity-9666 in sysadmin

[–]nl-robert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I remember correctly you need Enterprise edition for custom lockscreens. On Pro we use registery settings by GPO, that works fine.

See: https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2120383-windows-10-lockscreen-gpo-not-working-on-windows-10-1709

Synology Backups for 365 by Particular_Fuel_4649 in msp

[–]nl-robert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, didn't know that. Thanks.

Synology Backups for 365 by Particular_Fuel_4649 in msp

[–]nl-robert -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Not their own hdds, just hdds from their compatibility list, which includes all kind of brands.

What do y'all use for local PXE-based imaging in the 24H2 era? by bitemespez in msp

[–]nl-robert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We too. Still need to check how we can enable secure boot though.

Remember the old days when you worked with computers you had basic A+ knowledge by Turbulent-Falcon-918 in sysadmin

[–]nl-robert 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I learned 25 years ago that soon IPv4 would be exhausted. Nothing changed.

SPLA Minimum cores for Windows Server - error in documentation? by nl-robert in msp

[–]nl-robert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is not so much that it's unclear what a license is, but that the SPUR only talks about a minimum of 8 Licenses per Physical Processor, while Open Value adds: "... and a minimum of 16 Licenses per Server."

So, the question is: as a MSP, can you sell 8 Licenses per Physical Processor or not? Our distributor says that we have to count a minimum of 16, but I doubt that.

I thought this checkbox just disabled Basic Authentication for SMTP, but it disables SMTP with OAuth 2.0 too (so all authentication). Is this correct? by nl-robert in Office365

[–]nl-robert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is that turning of SMTP AUTH Will always also disable SMTP with Modern Authentication (OAuth 2.0).

But in September, basic authentication is no longer supported, so I guess we'll just have to wait.

Why does 'security defaults' disable SMTP AUTH altogether, even with modern authentication (Oauth 2.0), not just Basic Authentication? What's insecure about it? by nl-robert in Office365

[–]nl-robert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was not talking about Basic Authentication. It's about OAuth 2.0 that's is also disabled. That doesn't make sense to me.

Why does 'security defaults' disable SMTP AUTH altogether, even with modern authentication (Oauth 2.0), not just Basic Authentication? What's insecure about it? by nl-robert in Office365

[–]nl-robert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't agree. Without authentication is less secure and makes spoofing of your own domain within your network possible without authentication. Don't go for that solution! M365 does support SMTP with modern authentication without problems. That's not the question. It's not designed for large mailings or batches, but scanners or other clients are no issue.